The only possible answer to this question is that $\Phi = i^{\ast\ast}: W^{\ast\ast} \to V^{\ast\ast}$ where $i: W \to V$ is the inclusion (note that $\Phi$ is not just any embedding—it is forced upon us). We only have to check that it has the desired properties.
So, let us check that $i^{\ast\ast}$ is an isometric embedding, that is, we want to check that for
$w^{\ast\ast} \in W^{\ast\ast}$ we have
$$\tag{1}
\sup_{\|w^\ast\|_{W^\ast} \leq 1}{
\left|
\langle w^{\ast\ast}, w^\ast\rangle_{W^{\ast\ast},W^\ast}
\right|
} =
\|w^{\ast\ast}\|_{W^{\ast\ast}}
\stackrel{\color{red}{(!!)}}{=}
\|i^{\ast\ast}w^{\ast\ast}\|_{V^{\ast\ast}} =
\sup_{\|v^{\ast}\|_{V^{\ast}} \leq 1}{
\left|
\langle i^{\ast\ast}w^{\ast\ast},v^{\ast}\rangle_{V^{\ast\ast},V^{\ast}}
\right|
}. \quad
$$
Notice that $\|i\| =1$ implies that $\|i^\ast\| = 1$ and thus $\|i^{\ast\ast}\| = 1$, whence
$$\tag{2}
\|i^{\ast\ast}w^{\ast\ast}\|_{V^{\ast\ast}}
\leq \|i^{\ast\ast}\|\,\|w^{\ast\ast}\|_{W^{\ast\ast}}
= \|w^{\ast\ast}\|_{W^{\ast\ast}}.
$$
To prove the other inequality $\|w^{\ast\ast}\|_{W^{\ast\ast}} \leq \|i^{\ast\ast}w^{\ast\ast}\|_{V^{\ast\ast}}$, let $v^\ast \in V^\ast$ and compute
$$\tag{3}
\langle i^{\ast\ast}w^{\ast\ast}, v^\ast \rangle_{V^{\ast\ast},V^{\ast}} =
\langle w^{\ast\ast}, i^{\ast}v^{\ast}\rangle_{W^{\ast\ast},W^\ast} =
\langle w^{\ast\ast}, v^\ast|_{W}\rangle_{W^{\ast\ast}, W^{\ast}}
$$
since $(i^\ast v^{\ast})(w) = v^\ast(i(w)) = v^\ast|_{W}(w)$ for all $w \in W$. For every $\varepsilon \gt 0$ we can find $w^{\ast} \in W^{\ast}$ with $\|w^{\ast}\|_{W^\ast} = 1$ such that $\left|\langle w^{\ast\ast}, w^{\ast} \rangle\right|_{W^{\ast\ast},W^\ast} \geq \|w^{\ast\ast}\|_{W^{\ast\ast}} - \varepsilon$. By Hahn-Banach we can extend $w^{\ast} \in W^\ast$ to a linear functional $v^\ast \in V^\ast$ of norm $1$. Combining the right hand side of $(1)$ with $(3)$ and our choice of $w^\ast$, we get
$$\tag{4}
\|i^{\ast\ast}w^{\ast\ast}\|_{V^{\ast\ast}} \geq \|w^{\ast\ast}\|_{W^{\ast\ast}} - \varepsilon,
$$
and, as $\varepsilon \gt 0$ was arbitrary, $(4)$ together with $(2)$ establishes the desired equality $\color{red}{(!!)}$ of $(1)$.
I think this is enough for the moment and I suggest that you think about the desired orthogonality relation yourself for a while. If you get stuck, please ask, I can elaborate but I'd prefer not to do it right now.