Think the point in this exercise is to remember the definition of the Euclidian division.
Namely, you should remember that, given polynomials $p, q \neq 0$ there always exist polynomials $c, r$ such that
$$
p = qc + r \qquad \text{with} \quad r = 0 \quad \text{or}\quad \mathrm{deg}(r) < \mathrm{deg}(q) \ .
$$
Moreover, the quotient $c$ and the remainder $r$ are unique verifying this equation with this condition.
Right?
So, let's try to prove that $T(h + h') = T(h) + T(h')$, for instance. By definition of $T$, we have:
\begin{eqnarray*}
fh &= gc_h + T(h) &\qquad \text{with} \quad T(h) = 0 \quad \text{or}\quad \mathrm{deg}(T(h)) < \mathrm{deg}(g) \\
fh' &= gc_{h'} + T(h') &\qquad \text{with} \quad T(h') = 0 \quad \text{or}\quad \mathrm{deg}(T(h')) < \mathrm{deg}(g)
\end{eqnarray*}
Now, let's add up both equations:
$$
f(h+h') = g (c_h + c_{h'}) + T(h) + T(h') \ .
$$
This looks familiar, doesn't it?
Indeed, with we think for a moment, we conclude that we also have
$$
T(h) + T(h') = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad \mathrm{deg}(T(h) + T(h')) < \mathrm{deg}(g) \ ,
$$
haven't we? But these are exactly the conditions that, by definition, the reminder $T(h+h')$ verifies:
$$
f(h+h') = g c_{h+h'} + T(h + h') \qquad \text{with} \quad T(h +h') = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad \mathrm{deg}(T(h) + T(h')) < \mathrm{deg}(g) \ .
$$
But, remember that this equation and condition defined both the quotient and the remainder uniquely. Hence we must have
$$
T(h+h') = T(h) + T(h') \ .
$$
(And also $c_{h+h'} = c_h + c_{h'}$, but they didn't ask us to prove that.)
Ok, so now try to prove
$$
T(\lambda h) = \lambda T(h)
$$
and you're done.