3
$\begingroup$

If $f(t)$ is a deterministic function of $t$ and $B_{n}$ is a brownian motion and:

$Z =\int^t_0 f(s)dB(s)$

How does one take the partial derivatives wrt to $t$ and $B_n$ on an integral like this?

I know $dZ = f(t)dB(t)$

Is this just?...

$\frac{\partial z}{\partial t} = f(t)$

and

$\frac{\partial z}{\partial B} = f(t)dB(t)$

Looking to apply the Ito formula on a bigger problem but stuck on this. Thanks.

1 Answers 1

1

I think Z(t) can not be differentiated with respect to time. All you can do is use Ito's lemma as you have already correctly done. Why I say the partial derivative does not exist is Brownian motion is not smooth and the paths of Brownian motion are almost surely non differentiable hence Z too is non differentiable.

http://www2.math.uu.se/~takis/L/BMseminar/BMnotes03_continuity.pdf

If you post the complete problem I might be able to help more.

regards.

  • 0
    You're right I think. I was trying to work out a characteristic function for this and if you set dt to zero it computes. Thanks. FYI ${\partial z \over \partial B} = f(t)$ I believe...2012-11-27
  • 0
    Hi, You can't write partial derivatives with respect to BM. Only differentials are defined in BM, meaning it makes sense to talk about dZ=f(t)dB but does not make sense to talk about dZ/dB (or partials). Because derivative is a limit. It's for the same reason that BM is not differentiable as if you could write dZ/dB then we know dB/dZ=1/(dz/dB) which is not defined. It is important to differentiate between derivative and differential in stochastic calculus.2012-11-27
  • 0
    Do you know if/why my answer is incorrect (if yours is correct)? I know that it's false to say that "you can't write partial derivatives w.r.t. BM". For example apply Ito's lemma to the function $f(t,x)$, where $x$ is $B(t)$ (in fact this is one of the most standard routines in stochastic finance). Applying Ito's lemma you will end up having to evaluate $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(t,x)$.2012-12-04