9
$\begingroup$

While trying to prove $\int_0^{\infty } \frac{\log (x)}{e^x+1} \, dx = -\frac{1}{2} \log ^2(2)$ How to show? in an alternative way, I came to this solution:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty}(-1)^{k+1}\frac{\log (k+1)+\gamma }{(k+1)}.$$

As both solutions have to be the same, the following equality should be valid:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty}(-1)^{k+1}\frac{\log (k+1)+\gamma }{(k+1)}=- \frac{1}{2}{{\log }^2(2)}. $$

Can anyone give me some advice on how to prove this equality.

p.s. You can be sure that the equality is correct, as I checked it numerically.

  • 1
    So, obviously the hard part is $\displaystyle \sum_k \frac{(-1)^k\log(k)}{k!}$. I think a possible route would be to see if you can find $\displaystyle \sum_k \frac{(-1)^kk^x}{k!}$ for a general $x$ (it's easy for integral $x$) and then you can differentiate both sides and let $x=0$. I have to run, but that should work, assuming that sum isn't actually too crazy for non-integral $x$.2012-01-20
  • 2
    Are you sure you wrote this right? I get $\sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^{k+1} \frac{\log(k+1)+\gamma}{(k+1)!} = -.1548995048$ and $-\frac{1}{2} \log^2(2) = -.2402265070$ approximately2012-01-20
  • 2
    The ! should be removed from the denominator: $\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{k+1} \frac{\log(k+1)+\gamma}{k+1}=-\frac{1}{2}(\log 2)^2.$ This is obtained from the integral by expanding $(1+e^x)^{-1}=e^{-x}-e^{-2x}+{\dots}$ and integrating term-by-term.2012-01-20
  • 0
    This is really annoying. I removed the !. I am very ver sorry for this error.2012-01-21

2 Answers 2

8

Note that $$ \begin{align} \sum_{k=1}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\log(k)+\gamma}{k} &=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(2\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\log(2k)+\gamma}{2k}-\sum_{k=1}^{2n}\frac{\log(k)+\gamma}{k}\right)\\ &=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\log(2)+\log(k)+\gamma}{k}-\sum_{k=1}^{2n}\frac{\log(k)+\gamma}{k}\right)\tag{1} \end{align} $$ Using the Euler-Maclaurin Sum Formula, we get that $$ \sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{k}=\log(n)+\gamma+\frac{1}{2n}-\frac{1}{12n^2}+O\left(\frac{1}{n^4}\right)\tag{2} $$ and that $$ \sum_{k=1}^n\frac{\log(k)}{k}=\frac12\log(n)^2+C+\frac{\log(n)}{2n}-\frac{\log(n)-1}{12n^2}+O\left(\frac{\log(n)}{n^4}\right)\tag{3} $$ Applying $(2)$ and $(3)$ to $(1)$, leaving out the terms which vanish, we get $$ \begin{align} &\sum_{k=1}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\log(k)+\gamma}{k}\\ &=\small{\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\log(2)(\log(n){+}\gamma)+\left(\frac12\log(n)^2+C+\gamma(\log(n){+}\gamma)\right)-\left(\frac12\log(2n)^2+C+\gamma(\log(2n){+}\gamma)\right)\right)}\\ &=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\log(2)(\log(n)+\gamma)-\log(2)\log(n)-\frac12\log(2)^2-\gamma\log(2)\right)\\ &=-\frac12\log(2)^2\tag{4} \end{align} $$

  • 0
    What is C in (3)?2012-01-21
  • 1
    @wnvl: I don't know if it has a closed form or simple name, but it doesn't matter since it gets canceled.2012-01-21
  • 1
    @wnvl: The error in $(3)$ turns out to be less than $\dfrac{log(n)}{120n^4}$, so we can compute $C = -0.07281584548367672486$ to $20$ places by setting $n=100000$.2012-01-21
  • 1
    @wnvl: I ran that constant through the [Inverse Symbolic Calculator](http://isc.carma.newcastle.edu.au/index), and it could not find a match. That leads me to think that the constant may not have a closed form or simple name.2012-01-21
6

This can be solved similarly to the original problem. The Dirichlet eta function is defined by $$ \eta(s):=\sum_{n\ge 1} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^s}. $$ The given sum can be rewritten as $$ \sum_{n\ge 1} (-1)^n \frac{\log n}{n}+\sum_{n\ge 1} (-1)^n \frac{\gamma}{n}= \eta'(1)-\gamma \log 2.\qquad (*)$$ We have $$ \eta(s)=\sum_{n\ge 1} \frac{1}{n^s}-2\sum_{n\ge 1} \frac{1}{(2n)^s}=(1-2^{1-s})\zeta(s) $$ so, using the expansions $$\zeta(s)=\frac{1}{s-1}+\gamma+O(s-1),$$ $$ 2^{1-s}=e^{(1-s)\log 2}=1-(s-1)\log 2+\frac{1}{2}(\log 2)^2 (s-1)^2+O((s-1)^3), $$ we get $\eta'(1)=\gamma \log 2 -\frac{1}{2}(\log 2)^2$, so (*) equals $-\frac{1}{2}(\log 2)^2$.

  • 0
    In fact, I use the result from [my answer](http://math.stackexchange.com/a/100975/) to derive the expansion for $\zeta(s)$ you cite above. See [*Riemann zeta near 1*](http://www.whim.org/nebula/math/zetanear1.html)2012-01-28
  • 0
    Great answer but something's off by a sign and I can't figure out what. The term $-\frac{1}{2}(\log 2)^2$ comes from the term $\left ( \zeta'=-\frac{1}{(s-1)^2}\right )* \color{red}{-}(2^{1-s}_{\text{third term}})=\color{red}{+}\frac{1}{(s-1)^2}*\frac{1}{2}(\log 2)^2 (s-1)^2=\frac{1}{2}(\log 2)^2$2017-06-05