2
$\begingroup$

It's possible that I'm missing a constant. Is there any way to directly prove this without invoking the Fourier Inversion theorem?

  • 0
    The result is missing a factor of $1/(2\pi)$. Using distributions, note that $\int_{\mathbb{R}}e^{-i\xi x}\,d\xi=2\pi \delta(x)$.2017-02-27
  • 0
    Alternatively, one could write $u(0) = \int_{R^2} u(x) e^{-2\pi i x \cdot \xi} dx d\xi,$ if you do not wish to have the $2 \pi'$s out in front.2017-02-27
  • 0
    Why is that first statement true?2017-02-27
  • 2
    Any proof of this identity will be equivalent to proving the full Fourier inversion theorem (with very small modifications). I would focus on proving this theorem instead and get this particular results as a freebee.2017-02-27

0 Answers 0