7
$\begingroup$

I was looking around the internet for a simple(r) proof of the Gamma Reflection Formula. I found this: Detailed explanation of the Γ reflection formula understandable by an AP Calculus student, and did not understand the last integration: $$\displaystyle\int\limits_0^\infty\frac{v^{z-1}}{v+1} dv$$

Can anyone help me? Explanations understandable by an AP Calculus student would be great!

2 Answers 2

5

Splitting the integral as $\int_0^\infty \frac{v^{z-1}}{1+v}\,dv=\int_0^1\frac{v^{z-1}}{1+v}\,dv+\int_1^\infty \frac{v^{z-1}}{1+v}\,dv$, and enforcing the substation $v\to 1/v$ in the integral that extends from $1$ to $\infty$, expanding $\frac1{1+v}$ as $\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^nv^n$, and interchanging the order of the series and the integral, we can write

$$\begin{align} \int_0^\infty \frac{v^{z-1}}{1+v}\,dv&=\int_0^1\frac{v^{z-1}}{1+v}\,dv+\int_1^\infty \frac{v^{z-1}}{1+v}\,dv\\\\ &=\int_0^1\frac{v^{z-1}+v^{-z}}{1+v}\,dv\\\\ &=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n \int_0^1 (v^{n+z-1}+v^{n-z})\,dv\\\\ &=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n\left(\frac{1}{n+z}+\frac{1}{n+1-z}\right) \tag 1\\\\ &=\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)} \end{align}$$

where I showed in the appendix of THIS ANSWER using real analysis methods only that $(1)$ is the partial fraction expansion of $\pi \csc(\pi z)$.

  • 0
    Can you elaborate on your steps? I still don't understand how you got from the 0 to 1 + 1 to infinity integral to the 0 to 1 integral.2017-02-27
  • 0
    @D.R. MV uses the substitution $v\to\frac{1}{v}$ in the second integral. In other words, make the substitution $v=\frac{1}{u}$. Then $$\int_1^\infty \frac{v^{z-1}}{1+v}\,dv = \int_1^0\frac{u^{1-z}}{1+1/u}\,\left(\frac{-du}{u^2}\right) = \int_0^1\frac{u^{-z}}{u+1}\,du.$$ Now rename $u\to v$.2017-02-27
  • 0
    @D.R. More importantly, combining the two integrals with the limits of $v\in(0,1)$ permits the next line: a geometric series $\frac{1}{1+v} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-v)^n$. Cool stuff.2017-02-27
  • 0
    @D.R. Enforcing the substitution $v\to 1/v$ so that $dv\to -\frac1{v^2}\,dv$ and the limits transform from $0$ to $1$ to $\infty$ to $1$. The negative sign on the transformed differential can be absorbed by flipping the new integration limits so they go from $0$ to $1$.2017-02-27
  • 0
    Ok. Now how do you get to the summations from the integrals?2017-02-28
  • 1
    @D.R. Note that $\frac{1}{1+v}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n v^n$ for $|v|<1$. We need to ensure that the interchange of operations (i.e., the series and the integral) is justified. We can do so by using the Dominated Convergence Theorem. Then, we can write $$\int_0^1 (v^{z-1}+v^{-z})\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^nv^n\,dv=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n \int_0^1 (v^{z-1}+v^{-z})v^n\,dv$$2017-02-28
  • 0
    (1) has the (n-z) in the denominator, but your Fourier series appendix had (z-n) in the denominator. Am I missing something?2017-03-09
  • 0
    @D.R. Let $z=(1-a)/2$ in $(4)$ herein to recover the relationship in the referenced appendix. Or let $a=1-2z$ to go from the expression in the appendix to $(4)$ herein. And recall that $\cos(\pi/2-x)=\sin(x)$ and $\sin(\pi/2-x)=\cos(x)$. -Mark2017-03-09
  • 0
    In your appendix, you said $\pi \csc(\pi y)=\frac1y +\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^n\left(\frac{1}{y -n}+\frac{1}{y +n}\right)$, which isn't $\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n\left(\frac{1}{n+z}+\frac{1}{n+1-z}\right)$2017-03-09
  • 0
    @D.R. What is the relationship between $y$ and $z$/ Why do you think these are not equivalent? I assure that they are indeed equal.2017-03-09
  • 0
    Yes, I agree they are equal, but I don't understand why the first one is $y-n$ while the second one is $n-z$.2017-03-09
  • 0
    To arrive at $(A3)$ in the [referenced appendix here](http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1913325/real-analysis-methods-to-evaluate-int-0-infty-fracxa1x2-dx-a1/1913576#1913576), we made use of two separate substitutions in $(A2)$ and combined those results. Once we have $$\frac{\pi}{2}\sec\left(\frac{\pi a}{2}\right)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n\left(\frac{1}{a-(-2n-1)}-\frac{1}{a+(-2n-1)}\right)$$ we can arrive at $$\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n\left(\frac{1}{n+z}+\frac{1}{n+1-z}\right)$$ by making the substitution $a=1-2z$.2017-03-09
  • 0
    Why do we have to make all those substitutions though? Your appendix already had an expression for $\pi csc(\pi z)$, so can't we just cleverly manipulate it to get $\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n \left( \frac{1}{n+z}+\frac{1}{n-z+1}\right)$?2017-03-10
  • 0
    @D.R. What are "all those substitutions?" But I see your issue now. The series in the referenced appendix begins at $n=1$ and has a term $1/y$ added to the series. We can absorb that term and write the series as in $(1)$, which begins from $n=0$. Try writing out the first few terms of each representation and convince yourself that they are equivalent.2017-03-10
2

$\newcommand{\bbx}[1]{\,\bbox[8px,border:1px groove navy]{\displaystyle{#1}}\,} \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\,{#1}\,\right\rbrace} \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\,{#1}\,\right\rbrack} \newcommand{\dd}{\mathrm{d}} \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}} \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,\mathrm{e}^{#1}\,} \newcommand{\ic}{\mathrm{i}} \newcommand{\mc}[1]{\mathcal{#1}} \newcommand{\mrm}[1]{\mathrm{#1}} \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\,{#1}\,\right)} \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\,{#2}\,}\,} \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{\mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{\mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\,{#1}\,\right\vert}$

With $\ds{\pars{~\Re\pars{z - 1} > - 1\ \mbox{and}\ \Re\pars{z - 1} < 0~} \implies \bbx{\ds{0 < \Re\pars{z} < 1}}}$:

\begin{align} \int_{0}^{\infty}{v^{z - 1} \over v + 1}\,\dd v & \,\,\,\stackrel{t\ =\ 1/\pars{v + 1}}{=}\,\,\, \int_{1}^{0}t\,\pars{{1 \over t} - 1}^{z - 1}\pars{-\,{1 \over t^{2}}}\dd t = \int_{0}^{1}t^{-z}\,\pars{1 - t}^{z - 1}\,\dd t \\[5mm] & = {\Gamma\pars{-z + 1}\Gamma\pars{z} \over \Gamma\pars{1}} = \bbx{\ds{\pi \over \sin\pars{\pi z}}} \end{align}