I encountered this in a paper, and I don't know what it actually means.
Let $K$ be a finite extension of $\mathbf Q_p$, $B$ a central simple algebra of degree $2$ over $K$, and consider the Lie algebra $\mathrm{sl}_1(B)$.
(I realise Lie algebras are usually written using \mathfrak but the paper uses \mathrm so I'm following suit.)
Now if $B$ were a field then I would simply interpret $\mathrm{sl}_1(B)$ as $\{0\}$, as that would be the only element of $B$ with trace $0$, but clearly that's not what the author means.