1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to write down the set of all ordered pairs $(n,m)$ such that $n=2k+1:k\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}$ and $m=2l+1:l\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}$. How would that be written in set notation?

3 Answers 3

2

I would use $$\left\{(n,m)\in \mathbb{Z}^2 \mid \exists k, l \in \mathbb{Z}^+:n=2k+1,m=2l+1\right\}$$

  • 0
    @BMehta should the $\exists$ be replaced with $\forall$ if I want all ordered pairs $(n,m)$?2017-02-23
  • 1
    @AaronHendrickson No, "all" is implicit in the set notation: $\{ x \mid P(x) \}$ denotes the set of *all* $x$ such that $P(x)$ holds. In this particular case, you want the set of all $(n,m)$ for which there *exist* $k$ and $l$ with the desired property.2017-02-23
1

One way is: $$ \{ (2k+1, 2l+1) \mid k, l \in \mathbb{Z}^+ \} $$

0

one another way is: $$ \{x|\exists y, z\in \Bbb{Z}: x=(y,z) \wedge \exists k, l \in \Bbb{Z}^+: y=2k+1 \wedge z=2l+1\}$$