Let's start with a change of variables: let $ u = \frac{x}{n} $. Then $$ nu = n\ln{(1+u)}-\ln{(1+u)} = (n-1)\ln{(1+u)} $$ so $ \ln{(1+u)} = \frac{n-1}{n}u $. Exponentiating, $$ 1+u= e^{\frac{n-1}{n}u} $$ Again change variables to $ v = u + 1 $; then $$ v = e^{\frac{n-1}{n}(v-1)} $$ i.e. $$ e^{\frac{n-1}{n}}v = e^{\frac{n-1}{n}v} $$
Now, if $ n = 1 $, then $ v = 1 $, $ u = 0 $, and so $ x = 0 $.
So let's assume $ n \neq 1 $. Moving things from side to side and multiplying by $ \frac{1-n}{n} $, $$ \left(\frac{1-n}{n}\right)ve^{\frac{1-n}{n}v} = \left(\frac{1-n}{n}\right)e^{\frac{1-n}{n}} $$ One final change of variables is left: let $ w = \left(\frac{1-n}{n}\right)v $. Then $$ we^w = \left(\frac{1-n}{n}\right)e^{\frac{1-n}{n}} = \left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)e^{\frac{1}{n}-1} $$ Clearly, $ w = \frac{1}{n} - 1 $. Now let's return to our original problem. Combining all our changes of variables, $$ x = nu = n(v-1) = \frac{n^2}{1-n}w = \frac{n^2}{1-n}\left(\frac{1}{n} - 1\right) = \frac{n^2}{n-1}\cdot\frac{1-n}{n} = -n $$
EDIT:
You are right, technically, this doesn't solve your problem; setting $ x = -n $ yields $ \log{(0)} $ in the original equation. One could argue that instead, it suffices to solve the continuous extension, which is what we did. But we can do better. For n > 1, we have two solutions. To get the other one, just use the other branch of the Lambert W function: $$ x = nu = n(v-1) = \frac{n^2}{1-n}w = \frac{n^2}{1-n}W_{-1}\left(\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)e^{\frac{1}{n}-1}\right) $$
You said $ W $ is way above your level, so in a second, I'll have some asymptotics to think about. But ultimately this is not something that can be put in closed form.
EDIT 2:
As $ n \to 1^+ $, $ w \to -\infty $, so $ x \to \infty $.
As $ n \to \infty $, we can see $ w \to -\frac{1}{e} $, so $ x \to \infty $ again.
So your solution should be roughly "U-shaped." Most symbolic calculators offer the $ W $ (on Mathematica, $W_{-1} $ is ProductLog[-1, #]&), so you ought to be able to plot the result. Mathematica puts a minimum at $n=2.75$ with $x=6.4$; the plot seems to indicate that such is the only minimum. I don't think looking at series along the boundaries of your domain is useful either; you just get nasty messes at best. (I had to pull out the NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions just to get started.)