I am reading Kobayashi book entitled Differential Geometry of Complex Vector bundles.
He introduced the concept of hermitian metric on a complex vector bundle $E \to M$, with $M$ not necessarily a complex manifold, being the tensor field such that at every point it defines a complex hermitian inner product.
So, if locally there exists a local frame $s = (s_1,\ldots,s_r)$ (Assuming rank $r$) and being $h$ such tensor field, I can easily compute the matrix associated to $h$ as:
$$h_{ij} := h(s_i,s_j).$$
In particular, the same procedure applies to holomorphic vector bundles, where the local frame has the property of being a holomorphic function between the basis manifold and the bundle, where the basis manifold and the total space are complex manifolds.
Considering $M$ being a complex $n-$dimensional manifold, the tangent bundle $TM$ to $M$ can be seen as a holomorphic vector bundle. In fact, if we consider $TM_{\mathbb{C}} := TM\otimes_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbb{C}$ then it splits as $$TM_{\mathbb{C}} = TM'\oplus TM'',$$ where the spaces on the decomposition are the eigenspaces associated to the extension to $TM_{\mathbb{C}}$ of the standard complex structure on $M$.
In local coordinates $(z^ 1,\ldots,z^ n)$ the space $TM'$ can be seen as the space generated by $\{\frac{\partial}{\partial z^ k}\}_{k =1}^ n.$ In particular, $TM$ possess the structure of a $n-$vector bundle once $TM \cong T'M.$
Here is where I get stuck. The author claims:
Let $TM$ as above with a hermitian metric $h$. Then, locally we can write the components of $h$ as: $$h_{i\overline{j}} := h(\frac{\partial}{\partial z^ i}, \frac{\partial}{\partial \overline{z}^ j}).$$
It is known that a complex manifold with a Riemannian metric $g$ orthogonal with the respect to the standard complex structure $J$ is called an hermitian manifold with hermitian metric $g$. The metric $g$ can be extended to $T_\mathbb{C}M$ and its only non-null components are precisely $h_{i\overline{j}}$ defined above.
So my question is: Why if we consider $TM$ as holomorphic vector bundle the expression for these two metrics coincide? Why are the mixed terms the only non-null terms even if we consider $TM$ as an holomorphic vector bundle? It should not appear any mixed index on the metric.. What am I missing?