1
$\begingroup$

The Gamma function satisfies:

$$\Gamma(z + 1) = z\Gamma(z)$$ $$\Gamma(z)\Gamma(1 - z) = \frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)}$$ $$\prod_{k = 0}^{n-1}\Gamma\left(a+\frac{k}{n}\right) = (2\pi)^{(n-1)/2}n^{-na + 1/2}\Gamma(na)$$

The Rohrlich conjecture states:

Any multiplicative dependence relation of the form $$\pi^{b/2}\prod_{a \in \mathbb{Q}}\Gamma(a)^{m_a} \in \bar{\mathbb{Q}}$$ is a consequence of the relations above.

Do we know special cases where this is valid? For instance, given rationals $a$ and $b$, do we know when $\dfrac{1}{\pi}\dfrac{\Gamma(a)\Gamma(b)}{\Gamma(a + b)}$ is algebraic? And for three rationals?

  • 0
    So far as I know, it is unknown whether, say, $\Gamma(1/5)$ is algebraic.2017-02-20
  • 1
    Wikipedia agrees with me, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particular_values_of_the_Gamma_function#General_rational_arguments so I suspect very, very little is known about your question.2017-02-21
  • 0
    Hossein likes this post. Regards!2017-03-03
  • 0
    Lang strengthened it from monomial to polynomial relations.2017-07-24

1 Answers 1

-1

At least two of gamma(1/5), gamma(2/5) and pi are algebraically independent. ..

  • 0
    This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient [reputation](https://math.stackexchange.com/help/whats-reputation) you will be able to [comment on any post](https://math.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/comment); instead, [provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/214173/why-do-i-need-50-reputation-to-comment-what-can-i-do-instead). - [From Review](/review/low-quality-posts/839379)2017-07-10