0
$\begingroup$

Thank you for looking in to my question.

I have 8 reactors in duplicate, I am measuring voltage (my result), call it "V", as well as a number of parameters (e.g. pH) call it "P" which may affect the result.

What is a proper method for statistically showing the correlation between "V" and "P" ?

I was thinking that the coefficient of variation, could be a valid way of showing a correlation between a deviation in parameters, and a deviation in results..

I could then use this to try and disprove that my results are significant ?

Other suggestions to statistical analysis are most welcome

thank you for your time

  • 0
    I think you mean "coefficient of correlation," not "coefficient of variation." The latter is for a single variable. Please read Answer below, and edit your Question as appropriate.2017-02-18

1 Answers 1

0

I guess you want quantify the association between variables $V$ and $P.$ By eight 'reactors', I suppose you mean you have eight values of $V$ and eight matching values of $P.$

First, I would make a plot of the eight $V_i$ against their corresponding $P_i.$ If the relationship is 'mainly' linear, then you should use the coefficient of correlation $r$ to assess the association. (See the link.) By "linear" I don't mean the points all need to lie exactly on a straight line; I mean that a straight line should 'fit' the data better than some kind of simple curve. The coefficient of correlation $r$ measures linear association. If $r > 0,$ then $V$ increases as $P$ increases. If $r < 0$ then $V,$ decreases as $P$ increases. If $r \approx 0,$ then there is no linear association. Always, $-1 \le r \le 1,$ where $r = \pm 1$ indicates perfect fit of the points to a line. There is a statistical test to check whether the data are consistent with $r = 0.$

If the relationship is steadily increasing or decreasing, but not mainly linear, then Spearman's rank correlation may be more useful. (See the link.)

Here is a plot to illustrate these ideas. In the nearly linear plot at left $r = .995.$ In the curved plot at right the coefficient of correlation $r = .964,$ but Spearman's rank coefficient $r_s = 1.$

enter image description here

Regression methods might allow you to find the best equation for expressing $V$ in terms of $R$ (or $R$ in terms of $V$), or to predict the value of one variable given the value of the other.

These are only vague statements for orientation. Without seeing your data and knowing what your objective is, it is very difficult to give specific advice. If you have data, please post them with $V$ on one line, separated by commas, and corresponding values of $R$ (same order) on another line, separated by commas. Also say what you mean by a 'significant' finding. Then maybe I or someone else on this site can give your further guidance.