Assume that $A\sim A\cup \{ A\}$, does that imply that $P(P(A))\sim P(P(A))\times P(P(A))$ without using the axiom of choice?
$A\sim A\cup \{ A\}$ implies $P(P(A))\sim P(P(A))\times P(P(A))$?
-2
$\begingroup$
elementary-set-theory
cardinals
axiom-of-choice
1 Answers
1
This is a matter of cardinal arithmetic. Let $a$ denote $|A|$.
Then $2^{2^a}\times 2^{2^a}=2^{2^a+2^a}$. So it is enough to prove that $2^a+2^a=2^a$. But $2^a+2^a=2^{a+1}$. Finally, using the assumption, the conclusion follows.
-
0Could it be done without cardinal arithmetic and using functions and well known fact about cardinality? – 2017-02-17
-
0Just "unroll" the cardinal arithmetic to produce bijections. – 2017-02-17
-
0Thank you so much for your time, but can you show me the proof explicitly in order to have it if I give up, because I am completely stuck. – 2017-02-17
-
0Open any book, and work the proofs about cardinal arithmetic. They are often constructive. From one bijection to the next. And just work this sort of argument here. – 2017-02-17
-
0But the first property works only if they are disjoint – 2017-02-17
-
0I only have proof when they are disjoint. Can you give me more information about where I can see proof when they are not disjoint? – 2017-02-17