The question is:
Maximize $x_1 − 2x_2 − 3x_3 − x_4$ subject to the constraints $x_j ≥ 0$ for all $j$ and
\begin{align} x_1 − x_2 − 2x_3 − x_4 \le& 4 \\ 2x_1 + x_3 − 4x_4 \le& 2 \\ −2x_1 + x_2 + x_4 \le& 1. \end{align}
Adding slack variables I get:
\begin{align} x_1 − x_2 − 2x_3 − x_4 + s_1 + 0s_2 + 0s_3 =& 4 \\ 2x_1 + 0x_2 + x_3 − 4x_4 + 0s_1 +s_2 + 0s_3 =& 2 \\ −2x_1 + x_2 + 0x_3 + x_4 + 0s_1 + 0s_2 + s_3 =& 1. \end{align}
Doing out my table I get:
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline BASES&x_1&x_2&x_3&x_4&s_1&s_2&s_3&RHS \\ \hline &1&-2&-3&-1&0&0&0&0\\ \hline s_1&1&-1&-2&-1&1&0&0&4\\ \hline s_2&2&0&1&-4&0&1&0&2\\ \hline s_3&-2&1&0&1&0&0&1&1\\ \hline \end{array}
I choose to swap bases $x_1$ and $s_2$ since $x_1$ takes on the greatest coefficient in the objective function and $s_2$ basis row takes on the smallest non-negative ratio between RHS and and $x_1$. I get:
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline BASES&x_1&x_2&x_3&x_4&s_1&s_2&s_3&RHS \\ \hline &0&2&\frac{7}{2}&-1&0&\frac{1}{2}&0&1\\ \hline s_1&0&1&\frac{5}{2}&-1&-1&\frac{1}{2}&0&-3\\ \hline x_1&1&0&\frac{1}{2}&-2&0&\frac{1}{2}&0&1\\ \hline s_3&0&1&1&-3&0&1&1&3\\ \hline \end{array}
Now $x_3$ holds the greatest coefficient and $x_1$ the smallest ratio since $1/\frac{1}{2} = 2 < 3$
Swapping those we get
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline BASES&x_1&x_2&x_3&x_4&s_1&s_2&s_3&RHS \\ \hline &7&-2&0&-13&0&3&0&6\\ \hline s_1&5&-1&0&-9&1&2&0&13\\ \hline x_3&2&0&1&-4&0&1&0&2\\ \hline s_3&-2&1&0&1&0&0&1&1\\ \hline \end{array}
Now we choose to swap $x_1$ in for the basis of $x_3$ since $x_1=7$ holds the largest value and $\frac{2}{2} = 1$ holds the smallest ratio.
From here we just keep swapping $x_1$ and $x_3$ indefinitely and the coefficients of the objective function never reach all-negative values.
Yet this seems to have a solution on linear programming calculators, so I must be doing something wrong. Does anyone know what?