I have a basic question about doubly transitive subgroups of $S_n$.
Let $G$ be a doubly transitive subgroup of $S_n$ such that $G$ contains a simple transposition. Why does it follow that $G=S_n$?
This fact is freely used in the article "Galois groups of enumerative problems" by Joe Harris, but without any reference. So I assume that it is a relatively straightforward fact, but a proof is evading me.
Let me recall few definitions for the sake of context. If a group $G$ acts on a set $X$, the action of $G$ on $X$ is called transitive if for every $x, y\in X$, there exists $g\in G$ such that $g\cdot x=y$. The action is called doubly transitive if for any two pairs $(x, y)$ and $(x', y')$ with $x\neq y$ and $x'\neq y'$, there is a $g\in G$ such that $g\cdot x = x'$ and $g\cdot y=y'$. In other words, we can use an element of $G$ to move any distinct pair to any distinct pair. Some authors use the terminology 2-transitive for this concept.
So, when we say a doubly transitive subgroup of $S_n$, we are thinking of the natural action of the subgroup on $n$ letters (or symbols, etc.), say $X=\{1, 2, ..., n\}$. This is an action "inherited" from $S_n$. Finally, a simple transposition just means a permutation on $X$ that switches $i$ and $j$ ($i\neq j$) but fixes everything else.