0
$\begingroup$

Alright, I posted this earlier and didn't really provide any context or format it correctly, so I figured I would fix all of that up. I'm a little confused on the idea of a limit point, so I was hoping to get some clarification. Our definition of a limit point is as follows:

We say that a point $p$ is a limit point of X if every neighborhood of $p$ contains infinitely many elements of X.

Equivalently, we say that $p$ is a limit point of X if every neighborhood of $p$ contains at least one point of X which is different from $p$.

I'm confused about where to go from here using our definition of a limit point.

  • 0
    I suppose you wanted to say $0<|p-y|<\varepsilon$ in the title.2017-02-13
  • 0
    Our homework says x, not $p$.2017-02-13
  • 0
    But you didn't define $x$.2017-02-13
  • 0
    Yeah...neither did my homework...not sure what that is about.2017-02-13
  • 0
    I suppose $x$ should be replaced with $p$, as it's the only way it make sense.2017-02-13
  • 0
    I guess I'll email my professor.2017-02-13
  • 0
    How did your professor defined neighborhood of $p$?2017-02-13
  • 0
    My professor said it was a typo and should've been $p$. We define an open neighborhood as "Let x be in R. An open interval which contains x is called a neighborhood of x." Also, I'm trying to format correctly and i have no clue what i'm doing. I tried doing the "an element of" sign, but it just shows up as \in.2017-02-13
  • 0
    I posted an answer. Just ask if you don't understand.2017-02-13
  • 0
    I understood it completely. Thank you!2017-02-13
  • 0
    I didn't realize I had the reputation to do so yet. Thanks.2017-02-14
  • 0
    Yeah I completely understand. Thanks!2017-02-14

2 Answers 2

1

Suppose $p$ is a limit point. We want to prove that for all $\varepsilon>0$, there exists $y$ such that $|y-p|<\varepsilon$. Let us take $\varepsilon>0$. As $(p-\varepsilon, p+\varepsilon)$ is a neighbourhood of $p$, there exists $y\in A$ that satifies $y\in (p-\varepsilon, p+\varepsilon)$. That is: $$y\in(p-\varepsilon, p+\varepsilon) \iff p-\varepsilon < y < p +\varepsilon \iff -\varepsilon < y-p < \varepsilon \iff |y-p|<\varepsilon$$

so $y\in A$ and $|y-p|<\varepsilon$.

Now, suppose that for all $\varepsilon>0$, there exists a point $y\in A$ such that $|p-y|<\varepsilon$ (that means $y\in(p-\varepsilon, p+\varepsilon)$.) We want to prove that $p$ is a limit point for $A$: that is, every neighbourhood of $p$ contains a point of $A$. Let $V$ be a neighbourhood of $p$, it must contain an interval of the form $(p-\varepsilon, p+\varepsilon)$ for a certain $\varepsilon$. So there is an $y\in A$ that satisfies $y\in(p-\varepsilon, p+\varepsilon)$, because of our hypothesis. We conclude noting that $(p-\varepsilon, p+\varepsilon)\subset V$, so that element $y\in A$ also satisfies $y\in V$.

  • 0
    Okay. I'm confused about this. It's an "if and only if" statement so i'm proving both ways. I just don't get which way you're proving. I don't see where limit points come into your proof at all.2017-02-13
  • 0
    Okay, I'm adding more details. I'm actually proving both.2017-02-13
  • 0
    Thank you. I'm really trying to understand what you're proving. The idea of limit points is confusing me.2017-02-13
  • 0
    No problem, I only wrote the general lines for it. Please ask anything you don't understand.2017-02-13
  • 0
    Okay. How do you go from $y\in $A to $|y-p|$ < e? Actually, just kidding. I think I understand that. You know its in the neighborhood so you're just rearranging the inequality and then taking absolute value. I got that. Let me keep reading.2017-02-13
  • 0
    I got it. I think I understand that part. Unfortunately, this question has 3 more parts so I'll try to do those as well. Thanks a lot.2017-02-13
  • 0
    You're welcome.2017-02-13
  • 0
    Let us [continue this discussion in chat](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/53591/discussion-between-johnie4usc-and-flytothesurface).2017-02-14
1

$\Rightarrow$ Assume that $p\in\Bbb R$ is a limit point of $A$. Let $\epsilon>0$. Then $(p-\epsilon,p+\epsilon)$ is a neighborhood of $p$. Thus, $(p-\epsilon,p+\epsilon)$ contains a point of $A$ different from $p$. This means that there exists $y\in A$ such that $y\neq p$ and $y\in (p-\epsilon,p+\epsilon)$. Now, $$\begin{align} y\in(p-\epsilon,p+\epsilon)&\iff p-\epsilon

$\Leftarrow$ Let $p\in\Bbb R$. Assume that for every $\epsilon>0$ there exists $y\in A$ such that $0<|y-p|<\epsilon$. Let $I$ be a neighborhood of $p$. Then $I$ is an open interval that contains $p$. Write $I=(a,b)$. Take $$\epsilon=\min\{p-a,b-p\}.$$ Then $\epsilon>0$ and $(p-\epsilon,p+\epsilon)\subset I$. Using the hypothesis,there exists $y\in A$ such that $0<|y-p|<\epsilon$. This means that $y\neq p$ and $y\in(p-\epsilon,p+\epsilon)$. Clearly, $I$ contains $y$ and $y$ is different from $p$. Thus, $p$ is a limit point of $A$.