If we look at the data for $100$ grams of sugar, that is to say
$$\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
\text{Volume} & \text {ABV} \\
1600 & 2.751 \\
1500 & 3.275 \\
1400 & 3.144 \\
1200 & 3.668 \\
1000 & 4.585 \\
800 & 5.764 \\
600 & 7.860 \\
400 & 12.052 \\
200 & 24.366
\end{array}
\right)$$
it seems that a model such as $$\text{ABV}=\frac a {V^b}$$ could do a quite good job. You can linearize the model $$\log(\text{ABV})=c+d\log(V)$$ to get estimates of the parameters (standard linear regression) and then use nonlinear regression using as estimates $a=e^c$ anb $b=-d$.
This would give
$$\begin{array}{clclclclc}
\text{} & \text{Estimate} & \text{Standard Error} & \text{Confidence Interval} \\
a & 5874. & 282 & \{5185,6563\} \\
b & 1.0349 & 0.0084 & \{1.0555,1.0143\} \\
\end{array}$$
Edit
All the above has been done using basic linear and nonlinear regression methods. If you want to combine both effects (what I did not do because a lack of data points, what I should do is to repeat the same process for different amounts of sugar and look how vary the parameters.
You could even simplify the problem assuming (if confirmed) that $b \approx 1$. Taking into your observation, may be model could just be $$\text{ABV}=\frac {\alpha \times \text{sugar}} {V}$$ Using the whole set of data points given in the post, it seems that $\alpha\approx 48.5$ leads to something acceptable.
This would give using the whole set of data points
$$\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
\text{Volume} & \text {Sugar} & \text {ABV}& \text {predicted}\\
1500 & 500 & 16.375 & 16.173 \\
1500 & 400 & 13.1 & 12.938 \\
1500 & 300 & 9.825 & 9.704\\
1500 & 200 & 6.55 & 6.469\\
1500 & 100 & 3.275 & 3.235 \\
1500 & 50 & 1.375 & 1.617\\
1500 & 0 & 0. & 0.\\
1600 & 100 & 2.751 & 3.032\\
1400 & 100 & 3.144 & 3.466\\
1200 & 100 & 3.668 & 4.043\\
1000 & 100 & 4.585 & 4.852\\
800 & 100 & 5.764 & 6.065\\
600 & 100 & 7.86 & 8.087\\
400 & 100 & 12.052 & 12.130\\
200 & 100 & 24.366 & 24.260
\end{array}
\right)$$