Let $ G=${$a_1,a_2,..a_n$}, show $(a_1.....a_n)^2=e$ where e is the identity element, G is an abelian group of order n.
I dont want the solution , i just want a tip to get me started
Let $ G=${$a_1,a_2,..a_n$}, show $(a_1.....a_n)^2=e$ where e is the identity element, G is an abelian group of order n.
I dont want the solution , i just want a tip to get me started
Hint: Consider these three sets:
$H = \{g| g \in G\}$ and $J = \{g^{-1}| g \in G\}$ and $G = \{a_1, .... ,a_n\}$.
Do the sets have any elements in common? Are there any elements in one set that are not in the other?
Hint:
Rearrange as $(a_1\ldots a_n)(a_1\ldots a_n)$. Now, for each element $a_i$ in the first grouping, there should be a unique element in the second grouping which cancels it. Rearrange to put them next to eachother.
Since $G$ is abelian, you may arrange the factors in any order without changing the product $(a_1\cdots a_n)^2$.
Now split $G$ into two parts :
the elements that are equal to their own inverse
the other elements
EDIT :
As mentioned in one of the comments below, there is no need to separate the elements of $G$ into two classes !
It is sufficient to observe that the map $i:G\to G,x\mapsto x^{-1}$ is a bijection (since $i\circ i=id_G$).
Hence, each factor in the product $a_1\cdots a_n$ is the inverse of exactly one factor in the same product so that, since multiplication is commutative, $(a_1\cdots a_n)^2=e$.
REMARK - 1
We may reach $e$ without squaring, in some finite abelian groups.
For example in $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$ :
$$(0,0)+(1,0)+(0,1)+(1,1)=(0,0)$$
But with some other groups, squaring becomes necessary ...
For example in $\mathbb{Z}_4$ :
$$0+1+2+3=2\neq0$$
REMARK - 2
Without the assumption of commutativity, the product of all elements is not well defined since order counts !
But given some suitable order $a_1,\cdots,a_n$ in some suitable finite non abelian group of order $n$, there are examples where $(a_1\cdots a_n)^2\neq e$.
I tried first with $\mathfrak{S}_3$, but it doesn't work because whatever order we consider for the six permutations of $\{1,2,3\}$, the signature of the product will be $-1$, hence that product will be some transposition : $(12)$, $(13)$ or $(23)$, whose square is the identity !
Let's try with another non-abelian finite group ... say $\mathfrak{S}_4$
If we denote by $[1324]$ the permutation $s$ defined by :
$$s(1)=1\quad s(2)=3\quad s(3)=2\quad s(4)=4$$
and similar notations for the $23$ other permutations, we get (after a tedious computation) the following counterexample :
$$p=[1234] \circ [1324] \circ [1243] \circ [1342] \circ [1423] \circ [1432]$$ $$\circ [2134] \circ [2143] \circ [2314] \circ [2341] \circ [2413] \circ [2431]$$ $$\circ [3124] \circ [3142] \circ [3214] \circ [3241] \circ [3412] \circ [3421] $$ $$\circ [4123] \circ [4132] \circ [4213] \circ [4231] \circ [4312] \circ [4321] $$
(note that the 24 permutations are enumerated in lexicographic order except that the second and third have been exchanged)
It can be checked (fingers crossed) that :
$$p\circ p=[3124]\neq[1234]$$
REMARK-3
Suppose $G$ abelian and let $A$ be the subset of all elements of $x\in G$ such that $x^{-1}\neq x$.
The product of all elements in $A$ is $e$, because the bijection $G\to G,x\mapsto x^{-1}$ induces a bijection from $A$ to itself.
Now, if we remove the assumption of commutativity, this product (which is defined only after having chosen an explicit order) has no reason to be equal to $e$.
Here is an example, again in $\mathfrak{S}_4$ (same notations as in remark 2) :
$$[1342]\circ[1423]\circ[2314]\circ[2341]\circ[2413]\circ[2431]\circ[3124]$$ $$\circ[3142]\circ[3241]\circ[3421]\circ[4123]\circ[4132]\circ[4213]\circ[4312]$$ $$=[4321]\neq[1234]$$
hint: for each $a_i\in G$ there is an $a^{-1}_i, \ $ which must be one of the $a_j;\ 1\le j\le n.$
Now, write $(a_1.....a_n)^2=(a_1.....a_n)(a_1.....a_n),\ $ open parentheses, and use the fact that $G$ is abelian.