0
$\begingroup$

Is it true that central vertices (adjacent central vertices) of a graph always lie in every diametral path? Few graphs satisfy this property. But no idea how to prove it? Can anyone provide some hint/help to prove/disprove it?

  • 1
    Not every central vertex lie on every diametral path. Consider $C_4$.2017-02-09
  • 0
    Oh yes.... thank you very much.2017-02-09
  • 0
    @Smylic edited my question.... can you help now please.2017-02-09
  • 1
    More strong statement: it is false that every central vertex lie on at least one central path. Consider $G = (\{\,1, 2, 3, 4, 5\,\}, \{\,\{\,1, 2\,\}, \{\,2, 3\,\}, \{\,3, 4\,\}, \{\,2, 5\,\}, \{\,3, 5\,\}\,\})$. Also one pair of adjacent central vertices belongs to the only diametal path, but two other pairs doesn't.2017-02-09
  • 0
    Thanks for the clarification.2017-02-09

1 Answers 1

1

The claim "central vertices of a graph always lie in every diametral path" is not entirely clear, but I can't come up with an interpretation that is true.

If you mean

If $v$ is a central vertex, then every diametral path contains $v$.

then that is certainly not true in general. There are plenty of counterexamples where every vertex is central but no vertex is on every diameter: Cycle graphs, complete graphs, the graph of every regular polyhedron ...

It is not even true that

Every diametral path contains at least one central vertex.

which has this counterexample:

 A---B
 |\ /|
 | C |
 |/ \|
 D---E

where C is the only central vertex, but the path A-B-E is a diameter.

  • 0
    ...Thanks a lot for answer. It is clear to me now.2017-02-09