Let for each integer $n\geq 1$ the sum of divisors function $\sigma(n)$, defined as $\sum_{d\mid n}d$.
Then an integer is said to be perfect, or a perfect number, if $\sigma(n)=2n$.
For example, $n=6$ is perfect since $\sum_{d\mid 6}d=1+2+3+6=2\cdot 6$.
As a motivation of the following claim, I've included two statements in an appendix.
Claim 3. If $n$ is an odd perfect number, then the following condition $$2 \left( \sum_{m=1}^{\sigma(2n)-1}m \right) \left( \sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{1}{ \left( \sigma(2n) \right)^k } \right)= \left( \sigma(2n)\right)^2 \tag{1}$$ holds.
Question. Prove, or refute finding a counterexample, that if an integer $N>1$ satisifies $(1)$ then is an odd perfect number. Many thanks.
Appendix:
This is a genetic motivation of what were my previous claims related with previous one. You can write an easy proof as iff statements:
Claim 1. An integer $n>1$ is perfect if and only if satisfies $$2 \left( 1+2+3+\ldots+(n-1) \right)\sum_{k=0} ^\infty n^{-k}=\frac{n\sigma(n)}{2}.$$
And finally, (the same again)
Claim 2. Let $n>1$ an integer. Then $n$ is a perfect number if and only if $$\frac{1}{n} \left( \sum_{m=1}^{\sigma(n)-1}m \right)\sum_{k=0} ^\infty \left( \sigma(n) \right) ^{-k}=\sigma(n).$$
Remark. I've written these claims with LHS as slightly differents, to avoid misinterpretation. But the corresponding RHS were written intentionally in an attempt to get some interpretation (that I didn't get).