One of the methods mentioned in A Course of Pure Mathematics for proving irrationality of $\sqrt{2}$ is the following:
Suppose, if possible, that $\frac{p}{q}$ is a positive fraction, in its lowest terms, such that $\left(\frac{p}{q}\right)^{2} = 2$ or $p^{2} = 2q^{2}$. It is easy to see that this involves $(2q - p)^{2} = 2(p - q)^{2}$; and so $\frac{2q - p}{p - q}$ is another fraction having the same property. But clearly $q < p < 2q$, and so $p - q < q$. Hence there is another fraction equal to $\frac{p}{q}$ and having a smaller denominator, which contradicts the assumption that $\frac{p}{q}$ is in its lowest terms.
This Method is similar to this one mentioned in Wikipedia, named "Proof by infinite descent, not involving factoring".
My question is,can this method be used for proving irrationality of $\sqrt[\leftroot{-2}\uproot{2}3]{2} $?