Number of non-negative solutions of an equation with restrictions

Question

Q: Find the number of non-negative solutions of the equation $$r_1+r_2+r_3+\ldots +r_{2n+1}=R$$ when $0 \le r_i \le \min(N,R)$ and $0\le R\le (2n+1)N$.

My Attempt: I tried the stars and bars method but it did not work properly. If the upper-bound for $r_i$ was not there, then the answer would have been $\binom{2n+1+R-1}{R}=\binom{2n+R}{R}$.

But how do I deal with this problem in the given situation?

EDIT: For the problem, you can simply consider $R$ as fixed and I wish to calculate the number of non-negative solutions to the given equation only.

Answer 1

Let $$A_k = \{(r_1,\cdots ,r_{2n+1}):\sum _{i\in[2n+1]} r_i=k,0\leq r_i \leq min \{N,k\}\},$$ So you want $$\sum _{k = 0}^{(2n+1)N}|A_k|,$$ notice that it does not matter the restriction $r_i\leq min \{N,k\}$ because $r_i\leq k$ so you just have to worry about $r_i\leq N.$
You will have to use inclusion exclusion in the following way:
Let $C_k = \{(r_1,\cdots ,r_{2n+1}):\sum _{i\in[2n+1]} r_i=k,r_i\geq 0\}$(all the possibilities) and $B_{k,j}=\{(r_1,\cdots , r_{2n+1}):r_{j}>N,\sum r_i=k\},$(the ones you do not want) so that you have $$A_k=C_k\setminus \bigcup _{j=1}^{2n+1} B_{k,j},$$ then by inclusion-exclusion principle you have $$|A_k|=|C_k|-\sum _{l = 1}^{2n+1}(-1)^{l-1}\sum _{a_1 So $$k=\sum _{i=1}^{2n+1}r_i=(N+1)l+\sum _{i=1}^{2n+1}r^*_i,$$ hence $k-(N+1)l=\sum _{i=1}^{2n+1}r^*_i$ so use stars and bars again and you will get it.

By using also Hockey stick identity, answer should look like : $$\sum _{l=0}^{2n+1}(-1)^l\binom{2n+1}{l}\binom{(N+1)(2n+1-l)}{2n+1}.$$
EDIT: An intermediate step in between the answer for fixed $R$ and the answer for every $R$ is $$\sum _{k = 0}^{(2n+1)N}\underbrace{\sum _{l=0}^{2n+1}(-1)^l\binom{2n+1}{l}\binom{k-(N+1)l+2n}{2n}}_{\text{This would be the answer for fixed $R$}}$$

Answer 2

So we have $$ \left\{ \begin{gathered} 0 \leqslant R \leqslant \left( {2n + 1} \right)N \hfill \\ 0 \leqslant r_{\,i} \leqslant \min (N,R) \hfill \\ r_{\,1} + r_{\,2} + \cdots + r_{\,2n + 1} = R \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right. $$ understanding (from the context) that the $r_i$ are integers.
The formulation that you give for the bounds is quite peculiar, since from it we get $$ r_{\,\text{avg}} = \frac{R} {{2n + 1}} \leqslant N\quad \quad M = \min (N,R) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} N & {\left| {\;\frac{R} {{2n + 1}} \leqslant N \leqslant R} \right.} \\ R & {\left| {\;R \leqslant N} \right.} \\ \end{array} } \right. $$ Now, if the variables are upper limited to $M=N$, then the average will definitely be not greater than $N$, while if $M=R$, then the upper bound is implied by the sum.

In any case, your question turns down to finding (apart the change in denominating the parameters) $$N_{\,b} (s,r,m) = \text{No}\text{. of solutions to}\;\left\{ \begin{gathered} 0 \leqslant \text{integer }x_{\,j} \leqslant r \hfill \\ x_{\,1} + x_{\,2} + \cdots + x_{\,m} = s \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$ where $N_{\,b} (s,r,m)$ is given by the closed summation

$$ N_b (s,r,m)\quad \left| {\;0 \leqslant \text{integers }s,m,r} \right.\quad = \sum\limits_{\left( {0\, \leqslant } \right)\,\,k\,\,\left( { \leqslant \,\frac{s} {r}\, \leqslant \,m} \right)} {\left( { - 1} \right)^k \left( \begin{gathered} m \hfill \\ k \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right)\left( \begin{gathered} s + m - 1 - k\left( {r + 1} \right) \\ s - k\left( {r + 1} \right) \\ \end{gathered} \right)} $$

as explained in this post and in in this other one.