5
$\begingroup$

$$(x+x^{\ln x})^{10}=2^{10}$$ I tried to take the logarithm of both sides. To apply 10th root, but didn't get too far. Please help!

Edit: I have the following result which tells me that it has only one solution. $$x^{\ln x}=2-x$$ we take logarithm on both sides$$\ln^2{x}=\ln{(2-x)}$$ $\ln^2{x}$ is strictly increasing function (for $x>0$) and this function $\ln(2-x)$ is strictly decreasing (because is a composition of a strictly increasing one with a decreasing one). So we have only one solution $x=1$. What is wrong here?

  • 1
    $x=1$ is a solution.2017-01-24
  • 0
    It has another solution besides $1$ as well..2017-01-24
  • 0
    You got as far as $|x+x^{\ln x}| = 2$, right? And $x$ must be positive, otherwise $\ln x$ is undefined; so $x+x^{\ln x} = 2$.2017-01-24
  • 0
    There is another solution, slightly greater than $1/2$.2017-01-24
  • 0
    @TonyK Yess. That far I went2017-01-24

1 Answers 1

12

After taking the 10th root on both sides, we obtain: $$|x+x^{\ln{x}}|=2$$ Note that since $x \in \mathbb{R}^+$, we can deduce that: $$x+x^{\ln{x}}=2$$ Now, this equation has a solution which is obvious, at $x=1$. However, there is another solution to this equation.

I do not think there is a closed form solution in terms of elementary functions for $x$. Therefore, we must use a numerical method. I will use the Newton-Raphson Method.

The process is as follows:

$$x_{n+1}=x_n-\frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}$$

We choose an initial starting point $x_0=0.2$, a reasonable estimate of the solution.

We use the functions:

$f(x)=x+x^{\ln x}-2$

And find its derivative:

$f'(x)=2\ln{x} \cdot x^{\ln{x}-1}+1$

To obtain the iteration:

$$x_{n+1}=x_n-\frac{x_n+{x_n}^{\ln{x_n}}-2}{2\ln{x_n} \cdot {x_n}^{\ln{x_n}-1}+1}$$

Doing this gives the solution:

\begin{array}{c|c}n&x_n\\\hline0&0.2\\1&0.253997\\2&0.322907\\3&0.402142\\4&0.476180\\5&0.523933\\6&0.539434\\7&0.540775\\8&0.540784\\9&0.540784\end{array}

As the iterations $n \to \infty$, $x_n \to x$, the solution to the equation. Therefore:

$$x \approx 0.54078414712$$

You can implement this method to a spreadsheet, or by a more sophisticated software such as MATLAB.

  • 0
    Personally, I like to show the process of the iteration, but good answer anyways :D2017-01-24
  • 0
    @SimplyBeautifulArt I am actually adding this process to my answer now.2017-01-24
  • 0
    Oh. :D (and just for the record, I like tables like this: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2112441/calculating-error-in-a-series/2112453#2112453)2017-01-24
  • 1
    Nice job. +2 :D2017-01-24
  • 0
    @projectilemotion with the method you used, how do you know which solution your sequence aproximates? I presume this method could be used to aproximate also $x=1$. What starting point do you get?2017-01-25
  • 0
    For $x=1$, you can select a starting point $x_0\geq 1$ and you will obtain a solution which converges to $x=1$. For example, with $x_0=1.5$ it takes $n=5$ iterations to get $x$ correct to 10 decimal places.2017-01-25
  • 0
    Ok. So I should take a starting point as close as I can to the solution. Are there any requirements for the function? (i.e. monotony?) And how did you know in the first place that the function has two solutions. I edited the question with a proof that seems to me correct which shows that it has just one solution.2017-01-25
  • 0
    @projectilemotion I've graphed these two functions $\ln (x^{\ln x})$ and $(\ln x)^2$ and they seem completely the same on $(0,\infty)$2017-01-27
  • 0
    @projectilemotion Yes, the functions you've graphed are indeed different. But mine are. https://www.desmos.com/calculator. My claim is that $\ln (x^{\ln x})=\ln x \ln x = (\ln x)^2$ isn't this the property of the logarithm?2017-01-27
  • 0
    I apologize, I forgot about the other $\ln $.2017-01-28
  • 0
    I think I see the mistake in your proof. $\ln^2(x)$ is strictly increasing at $x\geq \color{red}{1}$, since $\ln(x)<0$ for $x\in (0,1)$ and $\ln(x)\geq 0$ for $x\in [1,\infty)$.2017-01-28