1
$\begingroup$

Let $(u_n)_{n\in \mathbb N^*}$ a non-zero natural number sequence, with : $$\forall n \in \mathbb N^*, |u_{n+1}-u_n|\leq \frac{u_{n}u_{n+1}}{(n+1)^2}$$

Is it true that : $u_{n}$ is bounded, if and only if, $\exists n\in \mathbb N^*,u_n=n$ ?

Source : les dattes à Dattier

  • 0
    what does $\mathbb{N}^*$ stand for2017-01-24
  • 1
    the non-zero natural number set.2017-01-24
  • 0
    The sequence defined by $u_n=n$ does not fit your condition. Neither is it bounded.2017-01-25
  • 0
    $|n+1-n|=1$ and $\frac{n(n+1)}{(n+1)^2}<1$2017-01-25
  • 0
    That's it, then: $|u_{n+1}-u_n|=1>\frac{u_{n}u_{n+1}}{(n+1)^2}$. Like I said, this sequence does not fit your condition.2017-01-26
  • 0
    This sequence is not affected by this result. This is not a counterexample2017-01-26
  • 0
    My trajectory is to give the integers a metric that makes the set compact, and apply a fixed point theorem.2017-02-08
  • 1
    WTF: Why the spree editions naming some results after yourself? A system flag was raised because to the site SW this was vandalism. If it was meant to be a joke, it is IMHO in a bit poor taste :-/2017-04-05
  • 0
    These results are my finds, so where's the problem?@Jyrki Lahtonen2017-04-05

1 Answers 1

2

Let $(u_n : n\geq 1)$ be a sequence of positive integers such that

$$ \forall n \geq 1, \qquad |u_{n+1} - u_n| \leq \frac{u_n u_{n+1}}{(n+1)^2}. \tag{*}$$

Notice that this condition implies

$$ \forall n \geq 1, \qquad \left| \frac{1}{u_n} - \frac{1}{u_{n+1}} \right| < \frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{n+1}. \tag{$\diamond$}$$

It turns out that $(\diamond)$ is the key property.

Lemma. $(u_n)$ is unbounded if and only if $u_n > n$ for all $n$.

Before proving this lemma, let us check how this implies OP's claim. If $u_n = n$ for some $n$, then $(u_n)$ is bounded by the lemma above.

Conversely, let $(u_n)$ be bounded. By the lemma, we can find the smallest $n$ for which $u_n \leq n$ holds. We claim that $u_n = n$.

If $n = 1$, then we are done since $1 \leq u_n \leq n = 1$. If $n > 1$, then we have $u_{n-1} \geq n \geq u_n$. If it happens that $u_n < n$, then $u_n \leq n-1$. Thus by $(\diamond)$,

$$ \frac{1}{n-1} - \frac{1}{u_{n-1}} \leq \frac{1}{u_n} - \frac{1}{u_{n-1}} < \frac{1}{n-1} - \frac{1}{n}. $$

This implies that $u_{n-1} < n$, which contradicts $u_{n-1} \geq n$. Therefore $u_n = n$.


Proof of Lemma. One direction is trivial, so we assume that $(u_n)$ is unbounded and prove that $u_n > n$. By the assumption, there exists a subsequence $(u_{n_j})$ such that $u_{n_j} \to \infty$. Then by $(\diamond)$,

$$ \frac{1}{u_n} = \lim_{j\to\infty} \left| \frac{1}{u_n} - \frac{1}{u_{n_j}} \right| \leq \sum_{k=n}^{\infty}\left| \frac{1}{u_k} - \frac{1}{u_{k+1}} \right| < \sum_{k=n}^{\infty} \left( \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{n+1}\right) = \frac{1}{n} $$

and hence $u_n > n$.