The following result is due to W. Burnside:
Theorem. Let $G$ be a subgroup of $\textrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$. If $G$ has finite exponent, then $G$ is finite.
The proof relies on the following:
Lemma. Let $A\in\mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{C})$ such that for all $k\in\{1,\ldots,n\}$, $\textrm{tr}(A^k)=0$, then $A$ is nilpotent.
It is not hard to see that the theorem still holds over fields of characteristic zero. Indeed, to establish the lemma it suffices to consider a splitting field of the characteristic polynomial of $A$. However, the theorem fails to be true over infinite field of prime characteristic; consider the following subgroup of $\textrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{F}_p(t))$: $$G:=\left\{\begin{pmatrix}1&f\\0&1\end{pmatrix};f\in\mathbb{F}_p(t)\right\}.$$ Notice that $G$ is infinite albeit having exponent $p$. My conjecture is that the following refinement is true:
Conjecture. Let $k$ be an infinite field of prime characteristic $p$ and let $G$ be a subgroup of $\textrm{GL}_n(k)$. If the exponent of $G$ is finite and prime with $p$, then $G$ is finite.
I already proved the conjecture for $n
Any enlightenment and/or references will be greatly appreciated!