2
$\begingroup$

In the book Complex Geometry - Huybrechts. The author says that the $k-$th wedge product of the holomorphic cotangent bundle $T^\ast X$ is the set of holomorphic $k-$forms. I know that an holomorphic $k-$ form is a section of the wedge product-bundle(WPB). Why the author calls a point of WPB "holomorphic form"?

  • 0
    That's not what the book says (at least not my edition). Definition 2.2.14 says "*The bundle of holomorphic $p$-forms is $\Omega_X^p:= \bigwedge^p\Omega_X$ [...]*"2017-01-21
  • 0
    Yes, but $\Omega_X$ is just the dual bundle of $TX$.2017-01-22
  • 0
    The point of my comment is that Huybrechts didn't write "the set of holomorphic k-forms".2017-01-22
  • 0
    Yes, but I think that "bundle" or "set" is the same in this contest.2017-01-22
  • 1
    I think that that is not correct. By "bundle of X" he means "bundle whose sections are X": Huybrechts often uses bundles and their spaces of sections interchangeably.2017-01-22

0 Answers 0