This is a long-winded way of proving the theorem. I restate the original statement as
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity, then $M$ is maximal $\iff R/M$ is a quotient ring containing only 2 ideals, itself $R/M$ and the zero ring $\{ M \}$.
I am proving this without the use of
That $R/M$ is a field
The correspondence theorem or any thing to do with the isomorphisms.
I do not want to use those facts.
$(\Leftarrow)$ Now assume $M$ is maximal relative to $R$ where $R$ is a commutative ring with unity. We need to show $R/M$ contains only two trivial ideals, the zero ring $\{0 \} = \{ M \}$ and itself $R/M$. Consider the principal ideal generated by the element $\{a + M\}$ with $a\not\in M$. That is, $J = R/M\{a + M\} = \{ra + M\}$ Now the ideal $ra + M \supset M$, but $M$ is maximal, so $ra + M = R$. This means $J$ cannot exist. So there cannot be any ideal in between the containment.
$(\Rightarrow)$ Now assume the quotient ring $R/M$ contains two ideals: $\{ M \}$ and $R/M$ itself, and if there is an ideal $K$ of $R$ such that $$M \subset K \subset R,$$ then there is an $k \in K$ where $k \not\in M$. Now for this choice of $k$ and using the ideal definition on $R/M$ itself, notice $$(k + M)R/M = (k + M) \{ a + M \}_{a \in R} = \{ka + M\}_{a \in R} \subset \{a + M \}_{a \in R} = R/M.$$
In fact this containment is equality because we are considering the ideal property on the $\textit{whole}$ ring, so $\{ka + M \} = \{a + M\}$. This means $ka - a \in M \subset K$. Hence if for $k' \in K$, we have $-a = k' - ka \in K$. Then $K = R$ and in fact $M$ is maximal.