How does Schur's lemma prove Claim 9 of
this article? The claim is that for pure states $\eta$ on some Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$, $$\int_{\eta}\eta^{\otimes n} d\eta$$ is a multiple of identity on the symmetric subspace (permutation invariant subspace) of $\mathcal{H^{\otimes n}}$. Because the integral is a quantum state this multiple is the maximally mixed state on $Sym^{(n)}(\mathcal{H})$. Schur's lemma as far as I know states that if a non-zero matrix commutes with all the matrices in an irreducible representation of a group, then it is a multiple of identity. \
This claim (claim 9 of the above mentioned article) seems to be well known as there are variations of it all over the literature. I appreciate your input.