I am trying to answer to this question: What can be said about adjunctions between groups (regarded as one-object categories)?
Here is what I have arrived at till now, but I can't conclude in some way. I mean, it seams to me that one last step is missing.
Let's consider $G_1$ and $G_2$ groups and let's view them as one-object categories $\mathcal{G}_1$ and $\mathcal{G}_2$, whose only objects are $G_1$ and $G_2$ respectively.\ Let's then take $F:\mathcal{G}_1\longrightarrow\mathcal{G}_2$, $H:\mathcal{G}_2\longrightarrow\mathcal{G}_1$ functors and suppose $F\dashv H$. This is equivalent to state that the map $\eta_{G_1}:G_1\longrightarrow HF(G_1)$ is initial in $(G_1\Rightarrow H)$ (it suffices to state it for this only map $\eta_{G_1}$ since $G_1$ is the only object of $\mathcal{G}_1$). However, being $\mathcal{G}_1$ and $\mathcal{G}_2$ one-object categories, we already know how the functors $F$ and $H$ are defined on objects, namely $F(G_1)=G_2$ and $H(G_2)=G_1$. So the map $\eta_{G_1}$ is nothing but a function from $G_1$ to itself.\ Let's now look at the comma category $(G_1\Rightarrow H)$. Its objects are the maps of the form $g_1:G_1\longrightarrow H(G_2)$, so they are simply the functions from $G_1$ to itself. A map between $g_1$ and $g_1'$ in $(G_1\Rightarrow H)$ is a function $g_2:G_2\longrightarrow G_2$ such that $g_1'=H(g_2)\circ g_1$, so we can write it as ``$g_1\rightarrow H(g_2)$''.\ Now, we want to impose that $\eta_{G_1}$ is an initial object in $(G_1\Rightarrow H)$. So let $g_1$ be an arbitrary object in $Ob(\mathcal{G}_1)$, and we force the map $g_2\in (G_1\Rightarrow H)(\eta_{G_1},g_1)$ to be unique. Thus we must have $g_2$ to be the unique map such that $g_1=H(g_2)\circ \eta_{G_1}$.
So now, what can we say really interesting about this $g_2$???
Thanks in advance for any help!