I have always found using shell method better and easier to grasp. But are there or would there be any situations where only disk method could be used.
Shell method vs Disk Method
-
0"equation's volume"? – 2017-01-13
-
0that was misleading. edited – 2017-01-13
-
0Theoretically, both are always usable, but which is easier is always the question. – 2017-01-13
-
0Depends whether it is in some sense "nicer" to integrate along the $x$- (resp. $y$-) axis when you ate given the function in terms of $y$ (resp. $x$). – 2017-01-13
-
0Got it! thanks. – 2017-01-13
1 Answers
Let $R$ be a plane region bounded above and below by function graphs, and to the left and right by vertical lines, and let $S$ be the solid swept out by revolving $R$ about the horizontal axis.
In principle, if the volume of $S$ can be calculated using disks/washers, it can be calculated using shells. In practice, expressing a "disks" volume such as $$ \pi \int_{0}^{\infty} \bigl[e^{-x}(2 + \sin x)\bigr]^{2}\, dx $$ using shells involves breaking the solid $S$ into pieces (perhaps infinitely many) because the "profile" $y = f(x)$ need not be the graph of an invertible function.
It's a good exercise to show that "shells and disks are equivalent" in the sense that if one integral can be evaluated in closed form (i.e., is elementary), so can the other. A special case is if $R$ is defined by $0 \leq y \leq f(x)$ and $0 \leq x \leq b$. The "shell" and "disk" integrals for the volume of $S$ are, respectively, $$ 2\pi\int_{0}^{f(b)} y (b - f^{-1}(y))\, dy,\qquad \pi\int_{0}^{b} f(x)^{2}\, dx. $$ Making the substitution $y = f(x)$ in the "shells" integral and integrating by parts gives the "disks" integral: \begin{align*} 2\pi\int_{0}^{f(b)} y (b - f^{-1}(y))\, dy &= 2\pi\int_{0}^{b} f(x) (b - x) f'(x)\, dx \\ &= \pi\int_{0}^{b} (b - x) (f^{2})'(x)\, dx \\ &= \pi(b - x)f(x)^{2} \Big|_{x=0}^{b} + \pi\int_{0}^{b} f^{2}(x)\, dx \\ &= \pi\int_{0}^{b} f^{2}(x)\, dx. \end{align*}
-
0Wow, I had never thought it that way. Thanks a lot! – 2017-01-13