2
$\begingroup$

If $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime to each other then each factor of $a^2 + b^2$ is the sum of two squares.

I have tried but couldn't able to find anything that leads to the conclusion.

EDIT : I want to mention that I have read two propositions of Euler from wikipedia.

(1) If a number is the sum of two squares and if it is divisible by a prime which is also a sum of two squares then the quotient thus obtained is also a sum of two squares.

With the help of this proposition the second proposition of Euler is proved which asserts that

(2)If a number is the sum of two squares which is divisible by a prime which is not the sum of two squares then there exists a factor of the quotient thus obtained which is not the sum of two squares.

With the help of (2) it has been proved that

(3) If $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime to each other then each factor of $a^2 + b^2$ is the sum of two squares.

Finally with the help of (3) Fermat's theorem of two squares has been proved.

My problem is I fail to grasp the entire proof of (3) from wikipedia.Can anybody please help me understanding it?

Thank you in advance.

1 Answers 1

0

There are a few steps, given the way this is asked. the beginning is that $a^2 + b^2$ is not divisible by $4$ or by any prime $q \equiv 3 \pmod 4,$ as such would force a common factor of $a,b;$ in the first case, $2,$ in the second $q.$ Quadratic reciprocity.

  • 0
    And then, the kind of factors of $a^2+b^2$ that remain, according to Fermat's theorem (a complete description of the set $\{ x^2+y^2\}$) finishes the proof, is that right?2017-01-12
  • 0
    @WillJagy please be more explicit.Because I am a new to this topic.2017-01-12