I am struggling with a simple example for explaining the cutting plane method for integer optimization problems. The cuts are Gomory cuts. For understanding the method, I read the introduction of Integer Programming, in which the Gomory cut is defined as: $$ \sum_{j=1}^n (a_j - \lfloor a_j \rfloor ) x_j \geq a_0 - \lfloor a_0 \rfloor $$ where $x_j$ are nonnegative integer variables which satisfy: $$ \sum_{j=1}^n a_j x_j = a_0. $$ In my case, all $a_j$s are integer, but $a_0$ is not (that is why I need the Gomory cut). Unfortunately, as all $a_j$s are integer, the Gomory cut leads me to $0 \geq a_0$, which does not make any sense. How is the Gomory cut derived in this case?
For reference, my original problem reads as: $$ \min_{\boldsymbol x \in \mathbb{N}_0} -2x_1 - x_2\\ \text{s.t.}\ x_1 \leq 6.5\\ x_2 \leq 4\\ x_1 + x_2 \leq 9.5 $$ I started by solving the relaxed linear problem and introduced the slackvariables $x_3, x_4, x_5$ to bring it to standard form and solve it via the simplex algorithm. The constraints look as follows: $$ x_1 + x_3 = 6.5\\ x_2-x_3+x_5 = 3\\ x_3 + x_4 - x_5 = 1 $$ As $x_1^* = 6.5$, $x_2^* = 3$ and $x_4^* = 1$, the solution of the relaxed problem does not satisfy the original one, so I wanted to apply the Gomory cut. The obvious choice would be $x_3 \geq 0.5$ which leads to $x_1 \leq 6$, but I do not see how to derive it from the Gomory cut definition.