Minimize the following sum
$$\sum_{j=1}^n\frac{1}{x_j+1} $$ with constraints: for every $j, x_j\geq 0$ and $\sum_{j=1}^n x_j = 2m, m\in\mathbb{N}$
Intuitively, it makes sense to pick $x_j\equiv 2m/n$, for we we have to keep the denominator as large as possible for every summand. How do we justify this, though?
I could view the sum as $f(x_1, x_2, \ldots , x_n) = \sum_{j=1}^n\frac{1}{x_j+1}$ and now I need to determine a stationary point of this function i.e a point $(x_1', x_2',\ldots ,x_n')=:P$ with $\frac{\partial }{\partial x_j}f(x_j')\equiv 0$
..but $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_j} \equiv -\frac{1}{(x_j+1)^2}$ which isn't zero for any $x_j'$.
Eventually I would like to apply the theorem which says if the Hessian is positive definite at a stationary point, then at that point, the function has a local minimum.