Is there an appropriate place on the internet where amature math enthusiest can publish proofs of either new results or old results? I'm not refering to proofs that a professional mathematician would be interested in but results that perhaps some undergraduate student somewhere in this world could find to be helpful? If there's a suitable place where they get critiqued that would be even better. Keep in mind that I'm not explicitly refering to proofs that are necessarily entirely based on my own research. In fact, I'm primarily refering to already proven theorems from calculus and real analysis that I've added my own touch to so to speak. I assume that this site is not an appropriate place to publish such things, right?
A question regarding an amateur publishing proofs of already known theorems
4
$\begingroup$
soft-question
-
2spelled amateur – 2017-01-02
-
0Thank you for correcting me. – 2017-01-02
-
1IMO mathematical reflections is a good place where you can publish for undergraduate or high school students. – 2017-01-02
-
1@Xammm I will look it up, thank you. – 2017-01-02
-
2Not sure if everyone will agree with this, but: if your proof is correct and is a little simpler or more clear than the typical proofs, you can post it here as an answer to a question that asks how the theorem is proved. I think many of the proofs people post on math.stackexchange are already like this --- a more or less standard proof, but with the author's own touch that makes it a little more clear than what you'd find in most textbooks. One of the nice things about stackexchange is it gives us a forum to share these insights that are not publishable but are still valuable. – 2017-01-02
-
4Questions about policy for Math.SE are appropriate material for [Meta.Math.SE](http://meta.math.stackexchange.com). A personal blog might suit your intentions, as might the wiki sites like Proofwiki that give collective efforts. – 2017-01-02
-
1Another place to publish it online would be, well, your own blog. I'm actually doing this myself.I don't get very many readers, but it's not zero, and my topic is rather esoteric. – 2017-01-02