6
$\begingroup$

Write the equation of the perpendicular bisector of the line segment between the points $(1,-2)$ and $( -1,-2)$.

What I have worked out so far:

The first part is $m = \dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$

$$m = \frac{-2-(-2)}{-1-1} = \frac{0}{-2}$$

$$m_{perpendicular} = \frac{2}{0}$$

Is $\frac{2}{0}$ correct? (But I can't divide by zero??) Where do I go from here?

  • 0
    See here: https://www.quora.com/How-do-I-find-the-equation-of-the-perpendicular-bisector-of-AB-where-A-and-B-are-the-points-3-6-and-3-4-respectively2017-01-01
  • 0
    0/(-2) does not equal 2/0, 0/(-2) = 0. In any case 2/0 is mathematical nonsense2017-01-01
  • 6
    Equals does not mean "and then the next thing is".2017-01-01

9 Answers 9

6

While solving problems on coordinate geometry, it often helps to draw the diagram. If you draw the diagram, you'll notice that the perpendicular bisector of the given line is the y-axis, i.e. $x = 0$.

For a rigorous solution, see the following:

We use the section formula to find out the mid-point of the line segment joining $(1, -2)$ and $(-1, -2)$. Thus the midpoint is $\left ( \frac{1 + (-1)}{2}, \frac{-2 + (-2)}{2} \right ) = (0, -2)$. Now this line segment has a slope of $\tan 0 = 0$. So it's perpendicular bisector must have a slope of $\tan 90°$ meaning it is vertical. So, write the equation of the line as:

$$ (x - 0) = (\cot 90°)(y - (-2)) \\ \implies x = 0 $$

Done.

  • 1
    Better avoid the equality between $\tan {90^\circ}$ and 'undefined'.2017-01-02
  • 0
    Yea, got rid of it.2017-01-02
2

the line through the points $P_1(1,-2)$ and $P_2(-1,-2)$ has the equation $y=-2$ and the perpendicular bisector of these two points is the $y$-axes.

  • 3
    This post gives no explanation of how the answer was arrived at. $-1$.2017-01-01
  • 0
    @msh210, pretty much par for the course for this one.2017-01-02
  • 3
    @upvoters You seem to think this answers the question. Please explain.2017-01-02
2

I'll approach this as a more general problem, using techniques that are probably beyond what this question was expecting the solution to use. Consider this an answer for future reference.


Problem:

Given $A=(x_A,y_A)$ and $B=(x_B,y_B),$ find an equation of the perpendicular bisector of the segment $AB.$

Solution:

Define vectors $\newcommand{\a}{\mathbf a}\a$ and $\newcommand{\b}{\mathbf b}\b$ equal to the displacements of $A$ and $B$ from the origin: $$ \a = \begin{pmatrix} x_A \\ y_A \end{pmatrix}, \qquad \b = \begin{pmatrix} x_B \\ y_B \end{pmatrix}. $$ Now let $\newcommand{\v}{\mathbf v}\v = \b - \a.$ Then the equation $$ \v \cdot \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} = c, \tag1 $$ where $\v\cdot\mathbf u$ is the inner product (vector "dot" product) of $\v$ and $\mathbf u$, is the equation of a line perpendicular to $\v,$ and therefore perpendicular to the segment $AB.$ The constant $c$ determines which member of that family of lines the equation describes.

We want a line perpendicular to $AB$ that passes through the midpoint of the segment $AB,$ that is, the point $\newcommand{\xC}{\frac{x_A+x_B}{2}}\newcommand{\yC}{\frac{y_A+y_B}{2}} \left(\xC, \yC\right).$ In order for this point to be on the line described by Equation $1,$ it must be true that $$ \v \cdot \begin{pmatrix}\xC \\ \yC\end{pmatrix} = c. $$ We can use this fact to substitute for $c$ in Equation $1,$ with the result $$ \v \cdot \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} = \v \cdot \begin{pmatrix}\xC \\ \yC\end{pmatrix}. $$ This is a perfectly valid equation of the perpendicular bisector of segment $AB.$ In a question such as posed here, however, no doubt a "simpler" form of the equation is desired.

Such a form can be obtained using the fact that $$ \v = \begin{pmatrix} x_B - x_A \\ y_B - y_A \end{pmatrix}. $$

Making this substitution for $\v,$ multiplying term-by-term to evaluate the inner product, and simplifying algebraically, we have \begin{align} \begin{pmatrix} x_B - x_A \\ y_B - y_A \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} &= \begin{pmatrix} x_B - x_A \\ y_B - y_A \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix}\xC \\ \yC\end{pmatrix},\\ (x_B - x_A)x + (y_B - y_A)y &= (x_B - x_A)\left(\xC\right) + (y_B - y_A)\left(\yC\right),\\ (x_B - x_A)x + (y_B - y_A)y &= \frac12(x_B^2 - x_A^2 + y_B^2 - y_A^2). \end{align} For any given points $A$ and $B$ we can then substitute the given values of $x_A,$ $y_A,$ $x_B,$ and $y_B$ into the equation to obtain the equation of a line in the simple format $px + qy = k$ for constants $p,$ $q,$ and $k.$ The advantage of this approach over most others is that it has no special cases to watch out for (such as when the segment $AB$ is horizontal or vertical); it works exactly the same for every pair of points $A$ and $B,$ requiring only that they be distinct points. But if you must have the equation in a different format (such as, "$y=mx+b$ unless the line is vertical, in which case write $x=k$"), it is easy to convert the equation above into the desired format.

In the particular instance given in the question, $x_A=1,$ $y_A=-2,$ $x_B=-1,$ and $y_B=-2,$ and the equation of the line simplifies to $$ -2x + 0y = 0, $$ or even more simply, $$ x = 0. $$

2

Notice that the line passing through $(-1,-2)$ and $(1,-2)$ is parallel to x-axis. So, the perpendicular bisector is parallel to y-axis.$\implies x=c$

And it passes through $(0,-2)$[midpoint]

Hence the perpendicular bisector equation is $x=0$

1

Since you know coordinates of two points of the line $(-1,-2), (1,-2)$, assume that equation the line is of the form $y=mx+c$.

Now putting $(x,y)=(1,-2),(-1,-2)$, will give you the value of $m$ as $m=\frac{-2-(-2)}{2}=0$

Let, $m'$ be the slope of perpendicular bisector, then $m\times m'=-1$ or $m'=$ not defined.

Finding the coordinates of mid points of the line as $x=\frac{1-1}{2}=0$ and $y=\frac{-2-2}{2}=-2$ or $(x,y)=(0,-2)$.

Now, you have slope for the perpendicular and also coordinates of one of its points.

So, $\frac{y-y_1}{x-x_1}=m'\implies \frac{y+2}{x-0}=$ not defined $\implies x=0$.

So, equation of perpendicular bisector is $x=0$ or the perpendicular bisector of the given line is $y-$axis.

Here is graph of your problem:

  • 0
    In the question as written, he does not have the slope for the vertical.2017-01-01
  • 0
    The problem is that the answer asserts something that is not true.2017-01-01
  • 1
    @DanielR.Collins, done now??2017-01-01
  • 1
    I'd say that "not defined" is not a value you can use in an equation.2017-01-01
  • 0
    should I use tan90 instead?2017-01-01
  • 1
    No, that's also undefined in real numbers. Personally, I don't think that talking about slope here is helpful at all. The perpendicular line has no slope.2017-01-01
1

The perpendicular bisector of $A$ and $B$ consists of all points an equal squared-distance away from $A$ and $B$, so:

$$ (x-1)^2 + {(y+2)^2} = (x+1)^2 + {(y+2)^2}$$

$$ \iff x = 0$$

  • 0
    Although I like this approach, it seems to me that there is a lot of algebra omitted between the initial equation and the solution.2017-01-02
  • 0
    That’s not really true: canceling out $(y+2)^2$, it expands to $x^2-2x+1 = x^2+2x+1$, at which point the solution $x=0$ is quite clear (mentally canceling out $x^2+1$).2017-01-02
0

To find the required equation follow procedure mentioned below.

1. Find Mid-Point of the given two points. ;

2. Mid-Point is (0,-2). Given line is parallel to the x-axis therefore, any line perpendicular to it will be of the form x = k where k is constant. Because value of abscissa must be constant for a line to be parallel to y-axis and hence, perpendicular to x-axis.

3. In this case k = 0

Therefore, x = 0 is the required equation.

  • 0
    @DanielR.Collins I am getting what you said. Please Clarify.2017-01-01
  • 0
    @DanielR.Collins corrected it.2017-01-01
0

Your approach to link to slope is incorrect.

Equal distance property is to be used.

$$ \sqrt{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2} = \sqrt{(x+1)^2 + (y+2)^2} $$

Simplifying you get $x=0$- or $y-$ axis.

To verify it, note that between the two points only $x$ coordinate sign has changed. So the locus is halfway in between, that is, the $y-$ axis.

0

A couple of important details:

  1. A line does not have a perpendicular bisector, because a line has no midpoint. Presumably you actually want to find the perpendcular bisector of the segment that has endpoints at $(1,-2)$ and $(-1, -2)$. In what follows, I assume that is what the question actually means.
  2. You seem to be using the fact that the slopes of perpendicular lines are "opposite reciprocals". A lot of students (and even a lot of teachers!) forget this is only true for lines that are neither vertical nor horizontal. If a line is vertical, then any line perpendicular to it is horizontal, and vice versa.

So now let's figure out what the segment going from $(1,-2)$ to $(-1,-2)$ actually looks like. The two points have the same $y$-coordinate, which means the segment is horizontal; see below. enter image description here

You can probably tell directly from the graph that the midpoint is at $(0,-2)$, but if that isn't obvious (or you want something more computational to be convinced) you can use the midpoint formula.

So now you want a vertical line that goes through $(0,-2)$. What line is that? It's the line made up of all points whose $x$-coordinate is $0$. In other words, the equation of the perpendicular bisector is $x=0$ -- which is actually the $y$-axis itself.