Can anyone help me get this Laplace transform, $$ L[(f''(x))^n] $$ where $f'(0)=0$ and $f''(0)=0$ and $n$ is power of $$f''(x)$$?
Laplace transform of $[f''[x]]^n$
-
1Whether or not relevant, it is interesting to note the following (not too well-known) result: the Laplace transform of the product $f_1 (t) f_2 (t)$ is equal to the convolution of $F_1 (s)$ and $F_2 (s)$. See http://www.atp.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/rt1/syscontrol/node145.html#sec:AConvolutionInFrequencyDomain – 2011-04-13
2 Answers
Hint: use integration by parts.
See here for a full solution.
-
0already tried that – 2011-04-13
-
0@user9551 It is all you need, really. I'll put the solution in the answer then. – 2011-04-13
-
0i do not find solution of this particular form there ,n is for power & not for order of diff. function. – 2011-04-13
-
0@user9551 Really? Apply the formula there to the second derivative, use the boundary condition you have, and then take the $n$-th power of both sides. – 2011-04-13
-
0really sorry but i don't get you ,can you please explain ,i'll be really thankful – 2011-04-13
-
0He means the n-fold convolution (on a vertical line in the complex plane). – 2011-04-13
I don't think there is a simple enough closed form (i.e. the case $f''(x)^{10}$ would be a sucession of integrals involving products and sums of the powers of all derivatives from $10$ to $0$ (the original function).
Integrating by parts gives:
$$\mathcal{L}\left\{ {f{{\left( t \right)}^n}} \right\} = \frac{{f{{\left( 0 \right)}^n}}}{s} + \frac{n}{s}\int\limits_0^\infty {{e^{ - st}}f{{\left( t \right)}^{n - 1}}f'\left( t \right)dt} $$
But then you'd need a new formula for
$$\mathcal{L}\left\{ {f{{\left( t \right)}^{n - 1}}f'\left( t \right)} \right\}\left( s \right)$$
Which would be, if I'm not mistaken
$$L\left\{ {f{{\left( t \right)}^{n - 1}}f'\left( t \right)} \right\}\left( s \right) = \frac{1}{s}f{\left( 0 \right)^{n - 1}}f'\left( 0 \right) + \frac{{n - 1}}{s}L\left\{ {f{{\left( t \right)}^{n - 2}}f'{{\left( t \right)}^2}} \right\}\left( s \right) + \frac{1}{s}L\left\{ {f{{\left( t \right)}^{n - 1}}f''\left( t \right)} \right\}\left( s \right)$$
And now you'd need one for the two new arguments. The recursion would be rather chaotic.
EDITED: Didn't read question properly.