4
$\begingroup$

Does anyone know of a good book that explains Spanier-Whitehead duality (other than Adams)?

Thanks

Jon

  • 0
    what do you want to know about it?2011-10-22
  • 0
    Well, basically just an introduction to it, which is in Adams I guess (although I feel that it's not as clear as I'd like), but also some explanation of it categorically (i.e. isn't there some notion of it in just a htpy cat. of a model cat or something?)2011-10-24
  • 1
    margolis mentions it in his discussion of the spanier-whitehead category. it seems pretty categorical.2011-10-26

2 Answers 2

5

Well, one classic source is some exercises in Spanier's book on algebraic topology (alas, I don't have my copy at hand so I can't give a more precise reference, but it is towards the end).

There is also a chapter on it in

MR0273608 (42 #8486) Cohen, Joel M. Stable homotopy. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 165 Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York 1970 v+194 pp.

However, I have to admit that I find Adams's book very clear and beautiful. Is there a reason you don't like it?

  • 0
    In my edition of Spanier it's Exercise F in chapter 8 on obstruction theory. It is listed in the index.2011-10-22
  • 0
    Thanks for this Adam. I haven't spent a great deal of time with Adams' explanation, but I just didn't feel comfortable with it, perhaps I just need to spend some more time with it. Also, I'd like to find it framed in a purely categorical sense, if possible.2011-10-24
  • 0
    Another issue with Adams' definition is that he uses this "join" operation, I believe, is what he means when he writes $S^n\ast S^m$ and I don't really have any intuition about this thing.2011-10-31
  • 2
    The join is something basic and easy, so I would advise you to think about it a bit. It's just a generalization of taking the cone of a space...2011-10-31
  • 0
    @JBeardz: This is very delayed, but if you are looking for a categorical viewpoint, Spanier-Whitehead duality is a special case of duality in symmetric monoidal categories (though likely you figured this out).2012-01-05
4

You might find the following interesting: http://www.math.purdue.edu/~gottlieb/Bibliography/53.pdf

even though it is not quite what you asked for.

  • 0
    +1, nice paper! It certainly does explain Spanier-Whitehead duality categorically. I liked the comment on page 18: the "geometrical" part can be summarized in the statement of Alexander duality, whereas Spanier-Whitehead duality in general (i.e. not only for complements of finite complexes inside spheres) is purely categorical. The latter is clearly explained in the nLab article for S-W duality.2017-01-05