2
$\begingroup$

I learned electrodynamics. According to the vector potential determination, $$ \mathbf B = [\nabla \times \mathbf A ], $$ Coulomb gauge, $$ \nabla \mathbf A = 0, $$ and one of Maxwell's equations, $$ [\nabla \times \mathbf B ] = \frac{1}{c}4\pi \mathbf j, $$

I can assume, that

$$ [\nabla \times \mathbf B ] = \nabla (\nabla \mathbf A) - \Delta \mathbf A = -\Delta \mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \mathbf j. $$ How to prove that the one of the solutions of this equation is solution like newtonian potential, $$ \mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}\int \limits_{V} \frac{\mathbf j (r) d^{3}\mathbf r}{|\mathbf r - \mathbf r_{0}|}? $$

  • 1
    The usual procedure is to find the solution of $\Delta A(r) = \delta(r)$ (the green function of the equation) and to make a convolution with the inhomogeneous part. In this case it seems that the green function in $1/|r|$.2012-06-13
  • 0
    I don't know about the Green function, because I don't study math on this level. Can you explain if it won't be hard?2012-06-13
  • 0
    It is based on Fourier transform, do you know it?2012-06-13
  • 0
    Yes, I know it.2012-06-14

1 Answers 1

2

Skipping the part about the Green's function, you should apply Fourier transformation on your equation

$$-\Delta \mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \mathbf j.$$

to change it into

$$k^2 \tilde{\mathbf{A}} = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \tilde{\mathbf{j}}$$

or

$$\tilde{\mathbf{A}} = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \tilde{\mathbf{j}}\cdot\frac{1}{k^2}$$

The left hand side is a product, so the inverse Fourier transform will be a convolution. The inverse Fourier transform of $1/k^2$ is $1/|r|$ in 3D, as you can see in formula 502. Therefore one gets

$$\mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}\int \limits_{V} \frac{\mathbf j (r) d^{3}\mathbf r}{|\mathbf r - \mathbf r_{0}|} \; .$$

  • 0
    From a mathematician's viewpoint, a cleaner approach would be to insert $\mathbf{A}$ into the equations and check. Fourier analysis requires assumptions that might be heavier than those for being a pointwise solution.2012-06-18
  • 0
    Sure, but I used Fourier analysis precisely because the OP knows it.2012-06-18
  • 0
    I understand. But also direct differentiation might be a good exercise.2012-06-18