I was wondering whether anyone can shed proper light on this issue. I read both and it seems like they are somewhat similar, yet I can't quite see it.
How is Cantor's diagonal argument related to Russell's paradox in naive set theory?
9
$\begingroup$
elementary-set-theory
-
0I don't think the (fake-proofs) tag is appropriate here, so I've removed it. – 2012-10-28
-
1I was trying to find the tag paradoxes, but couldn't find it and for whatever reason fake-proofs had paradoxes within parentheses, so I went for that – 2012-10-28
-
0Well no harm done either way. – 2012-10-28