2
$\begingroup$

I would like to compute the generators of the first cohomology group of this simplicial complex:

Graph

with coefficients in the Klein group $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$. I have no idea how to do that since I can't express the matrix corresponding to the boundary maps, like I would do if the coefficients were in $\mathbb{Z}$. How can I perform this calculation ?

  • 0
    Are there any 2-simplices glued into the gaps, or is this just a graph?2012-11-26
  • 0
    This is just a graph, only vertices and edges...2012-11-26

1 Answers 1

2

We have a simplicial cochain complex on no generators in dimensions greater than $1$, $6$ $0$-dimensional generators $e_i$, and $7$ $1$-dimensional generators $[e_i, e_j]$. Name the degree-$4$ vertex $e_4,$ the three to its left $e_1,e_2,e_3$, the two to its right $e_5,e_6$.

The next thing to observe is that every element of the Klein $4$-group $V$ is its own inverse, so that just as in computing $\mathbb{Z}_2$-coefficients we can rewrite the coboundary formulae like so: $\delta(\varphi)([e_i,e_j])=\varphi(e_i)-\varphi(e_j)=\varphi(e_i)+\varphi(e_j)$. In short, the orientation of the $1$-cells will have no impact.

Now in computing $H^1$ of our complex, we've only got to compute the image of $\delta$. From the definition of $\delta$ we get for fixed $g\in V$ the cochain that is $g$ on $[e_i,e_j]$ and $[e_j,e_k]$ and vanishing elsewhere is a coboundary when $i=1,j=2,k=4$, $i=1,j=3,k=4,$ $i=1,j=2,k=3, i=4,j=5,k=6,$ or $i=4,j=6,k=5$. Furthermore by applying $\delta$ to the cochain that is $g$ at all four left-hand vertices, we see the cochain that's $g$ just on $[e_4,e_5]$ and $[e_4,e_6]$ is a coboundary; similarly for $[e_2,e_4]$ with $[e_3,e_4]$.

Contrary to my earlier revisions, there are no coboundaries with support on a single 1-simplex, and this is actually easy to see: $\delta(e_i)$ is supported on either two or four 1-simplices, and if $e_i,e_j$ are the two vertices of an edge, $\delta(e_i+e_j)$ is also supported on two 1-simplices, so that every coboundary is supported on an even number of edges.

So we'll generate the cohomology by some subset of the 1-simplices. It's not hard to see that all the 1-simplices in the quadrilateral and in the triangle are cohomologous by applying the pairs of 1-simplices we've already seen are coboundaries. So we need at most two generators. In fact we do need both: the argument above about parity of support of coboundaries applies to each cycle separately as well as to the whole graph. I mean to say that e.g. $[e_1,e_2]$ can only be cohomologous to cochains supported on 1 or 3 of the edges of the quadrilateral, so in particular not to any cochain supported only on the triangle.

So, we have $H^1=V\oplus V$, with generators the equivalence classes of $[e_5,e_6]$ and of $[e_1,e_2]$.

  • 0
    Is the first $\phi$ in your third paragraph supposed to be $0$ on all the other elements $[e_i,e_j]$? If so, what happens on $[e_3,e_4]$?2012-11-26
  • 0
    Thanks for the check, Jason. I've fixed it.2012-11-26
  • 0
    I'm afraid I'm still confused. We have $\delta(\phi(e_1) + \phi(e_2) + \phi(e_3) + \phi(e_4) + \phi(e_5))$ gives $g$ when applied to both $[e_4,e_6]$ and $[e_5,e_6]$), right? (I'll try to work out exactly what the right combination is, now that I have some time.)2012-11-26
  • 0
    Yes, I think what's really the case is that we can get all and only pairs of edges as coboundaries, which makes so much sense. Thanks again for taking more care than I did.2012-11-26
  • 0
    I like it now ;-). Thanks for carrying out all the details!2012-11-26
  • 0
    Thanks ! I'm just confused by the formula you wrote in your second paragraph. Isn't $\delta$ supposed to take generators $e_i$ up to $[e_i,e_j]$ and not the other way around ?2012-11-28
  • 0
    Jean, $\varphi$ is a 0-cochain, so $\delta(\varphi)$ is a 1-cochain, i.e. acts on $[e_i,e_j]$. $e_i,[e_i,e_j]$ are *chains*, which $\delta$ doesn't touch directly at all.2012-11-29
  • 0
    My bad ! This is clear now. Thank you for your answer.2012-11-29