3
$\begingroup$

This eqn came toward the end of a much bigger problem, and I'm a bit rusty with these differential equations.. But maybe I got it right (probably not .. )

Anyway..

$$\ddot{Z}(t)=A+Bcos(\omega t)$$

to the best of my knowledge this is a Second Order inhomogenous non-linear ordinary differential equation (quite a mouthful) and can be solved as follows

Soln to homogenous part: $$\ddot{Z}=0 \ \ \ => \ \ \ Z=Ct+D$$

Then the soln to the particular case I wasn't quite as sure but this is what I tried:

let $Z = pt^2 + qcos(\omega t)$ where p, q are arbitrary

then $$\dot Z = 2pt - q\omega sin(\omega t)$$

$$\ddot Z = 2p - q(\omega)^2 cos(\omega t)$$

and thus:

$$2p - q(\omega)^2 cos(\omega t) = A+Bcos(\omega t)$$

$=>$

$$p=A/2 ; q = \frac{-B}{(\omega)^2}$$

which would give us our soln:

$$Z =Ct + D + (A/2)t^2 - \frac{B}{(\omega)^2}cos(\omega t)$$

Is this right ?! and if so, is this the most efficient method of solving this ODE?

.....

If this is right, I have an intial condition that : $$ t=0, => \dot Z = 0 $$

which solves to $C=0$ and

$$Z = D + (A/2)t^2 - \frac{B}{(\omega)^2}cos(\omega t)$$ Which is obviously not unique, and I was wondering about the significance of the undetermined parameter D. Does it just mean that the set of functions that satisfy $\ddot{Z}=A+Bcos(\omega t)$ and $ t=0, => \dot Z = 0 $ are all equivalent with only a translation up the Z axis.

Thanks a lot $:))$

  • 4
    That's right, but it's easier to just integrate the whole equation twice with respect to $t$.2012-09-23
  • 0
    @HansLundmark Thanks.. looks like I took the long route but at least I didn't do anything silly/wrong ..2012-09-23

1 Answers 1

2

It looks correct what you have written. So you have $$ \ddot{Z}(t)=A+B\cos(\omega t) $$ So $$ \dot{Z}(t)=At+B\frac{1}{\omega}\sin(\omega t) + C $$ So $$ Z(t)=\frac{A}{2}t^2-B\frac{1}{\omega^2}\cos(\omega t) + Ct + D $$ You get each step by finding the anti-derivative (i.e. integrating). If $\dot{Z}(0) = 0$, then indeed $C=0$.

  • 0
    thanks a lot.. I always seem to miss the obvious path but at least I know my intuition was right !2012-09-23
  • 0
    @Ronald: no problem. Glad to help.2012-09-23