2
$\begingroup$

Bell number B(n) is defined as the number of ways of splitting n into any number of parts, also defined as the sum of previous $n$ Stirling numbers of second kind.

Wikpedia page gives the following python code to print bell polynomials,here is the link which returns the $n^{th}$ Bell number.(this can also be found on the wikipedia page if scrolled down)

but when I use the Dobinski formula , and write the following code(in python),

import math ITERATIONS = 1000 def bell_number(N): return (1/math.e) * sum([(k**N)/(math.factorial(k)) for k in range(ITERATIONS)]) 

I get a different answer

for instance,

$5^{th}$ bell number according to the code provided by wikipedia is $52$ but what the other code returns is $50.767362881659039$

Can you throw some light on this matter, as to why am I getting different answer (possibly incorrect) using Dobinski formula ?

P.S. Is this question inappropriate for this site, if yes then where else must I ask this?

  • 1
    You're adding up a lot of very small terms. If you aren't using arbitrary-precision arithmetic they'll evaluate to zero sooner or later.2012-05-28
  • 0
    what arbitrary-precision must I use? (and what is arbitrary-precision?)2012-05-28
  • 0
    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrary-precision_arithmetic .2012-05-28
  • 0
    So its like the answer i am getting is affected by my computers processing speed.2012-05-28
  • 0
    It has nothing to do with speed; the issue is memory. By default, a programming language typically assigns a fixed amount of memory to represent a given number. If you try to represent a number with more precision than that, the computer will just ignore whatever doesn't fit into the digits it represents (if it's too small) or return an error (if it's too big). Ask Python to print out the individual terms in your series rather than their sum to see what I mean.2012-05-28
  • 0
    When I write the code to print individual terms the compiler returns the following error "-bash: line 1: 10050 Killed python vm_main.py " and it returns a very similar error when I increase ITERATIONS to 10000.2012-05-28
  • 0
    Yes, that's why you need arbitrary precision (or else stop using the Dobinski formula).2012-05-28
  • 0
    Got it, thanks for the awesome explanation and your precious time. :-)2012-05-28

1 Answers 1

4

The problem is that Python is taking the floor of the terms in the sum. I'm not a Python expert, but I think you need to tell Python somehow to use floats rather than integers in the sum.

Addendum: To follow up on the discussion in the comments, this modified version of your code should work:

def fact(n):     r=1.0     while n > 0:         r = r * n         n = n - 1     return(r)  import math ITERATIONS = 1000 def bell_number(N):     return (1/math.e) * sum([(float(k)**N)/fact(k) for k in range(ITERATIONS)]) 

For small $N$, ITERATIONS = 1000 is unnecessary. You can truncate the sum once the percentage change due to the most recent term drops below the threshold of machine precision. Moreover, it is machine precision, rather than the need to truncate the sum, that will be the limiting factor in obtaining exact integer values beyond about $N=20$, unless you go to multiple- or arbitrary-precision arithmetic.

  • 0
    If it took floored values , then why would it return a decimal answer?2012-05-28
  • 1
    When you divide by e, the number gets converted to decimal. It's integer up to that point.2012-05-28
  • 0
    Try this: 1/(math.e) * sum([float(k)**5/fact(k) for k in range(30)])2012-05-28
  • 0
    O.ops ,so thats how it is2012-05-28
  • 0
    I tried it your way, but it the compiler returns an error "OverflowError: long int too large to convert to float"2012-05-28
  • 0
    The sum converges fairly quickly, so 1000 terms is overkill for small $N$. In my example, I used only 30 terms. If you really want to go to 1000 terms you can write your own factorial function that returns a float rather than integer. Anyway, after a few dozen terms depending on the value of $N$, the error will be dominated by numerical round-off rather than by truncation of the sum. I don't know Python well, so you should probably seek expert advice on how to handle conversion of large integers to multiple precision floats.2012-05-28