3
$\begingroup$

I want to know whether $\lim_{(x,y)\to (0,0)}\dfrac{x^2y^2}{x^3+y^3}$ exists or not. I tried to approximate to (0,0) from different "paths" and the result was always 0. For example,

$f(x,mx^2) = \dfrac{m^2x^3}{1+m^3x^3}$

But that doesn't show that the limit is 0.

  • 1
    The paths in my answer show that for any $\alpha$, there is a path so that $\lim\limits_{(x,y)\to(0,0)}\frac{x^2y^2}{x^3+y^3}=\alpha$. Thus, the limit doesn't exist.2012-10-26
  • 0
    See also: [Nonexistence of the limit $\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow (0,0)} \frac{x^2y^2}{x^3+y^3}$](http://math.stackexchange.com/q/538770)2017-02-15

3 Answers 3

10

Hint: There is real trouble if $x$ is the negative of $y$. If you don't want to take the easy way out and note that the function is not defined when $x=-y\ne 0$, let $(x,y)$ approach $(0,0)$ along the parametric path $x=t+t^2$, $y=-t+t^2$. If you want more dramatic behaviour, use the path $(t+t^3, -t+t^3)$.

  • 0
    The limite, for this path, is 1/6. But how did you come up with this? I mean, intuitively...2012-10-25
  • 6
    @Thiago The idea is to be very close to $y=-x$. This suggest $x=t, y=-t$, but since the function is not defined there, you need to add something very small... If $t$ is small, then $t^2$ is much smaller ;)2012-10-25
  • 0
    @Thiago You can try to understand this by drawing pictures for possible $(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^{2}$. If there is a limit, then for any small neighborhood $D_{\epsilon}$ around $x^{2}y^{2}/(x^{3}+y^{3})$, you should be able to find some neighborhood $D_{\delta}$ around $(0,0)$ where every $(x, y) \mapsto x^{2}y^{2}/(x^{3} + y^{3}) \in D_{\epsilon}$. But even in that $D_{\delta}$, we have so many path to "screw" this quantity up.2012-10-25
  • 0
    @Thiago: N.S. has explained the motivation. The $t^2$ was (i) to be a tiny bit away from $y=-x$, but only a tiny bit; (ii) so $t^2$ is a natural shift to try, I tried and it worked; (iii) also, for fun, I wanted the limit along the path to be finite.2012-10-25
  • 0
    For me, this started make sense when I first read Walter Rudin's Principle of Mathematical Analysis (Baby Rudin). Understanding general metric space was a lot more clear for me, but I don't know if that's the case for you too.2012-10-25
  • 2
    @Thiago: More. The idea is that if we perturb $(t,-t)$ a little, then the "lead term" in $x^3+y^3$ will disappear, while the lead term in $x^2y^2$ won't. This will give us a good deal of control over the behaviour of the limit. Like you, I was changing to a one variable problem. Could have used $(t,-t+t^2)$, but have a liking for whatever symmetry might be around. Stuff like cancellation of lead terms happens a lot in one variable limits, particularly if we use series methods.2012-10-25
3

Hint

Choose any $\alpha\ne0$. As $t\to-1$, consider the path $$ (x,y)=\alpha(t^3+1)\left(\frac1{t^2},\frac1{t}\right)\to(0,0) $$ For $\alpha=0$ use $$ (x,y)=(t^3+1,0)\to(0,0) $$ More Hint

For all $t\ne-1$, $\dfrac{x^2y^2}{x^3+y^3}=\alpha$.

1

Hint: Use $\sqrt[3]{\frac{x^3+y^3}2}\ge \sqrt{xy}$.

  • 0
    Only when $x,y \geq 0$.2012-10-25