10
$\begingroup$

Just a quick question to verify whether I'm right.

Claim: The fundamental group of the complement of $n$ lines through the origin in $\mathbb{R}^3$ is $F_n$, the free group on $n$ generators.

Proof: remove a line from $\mathbb{R}^3$. We may deformation retract the remaining space onto a cylinder radius $\epsilon$ about the line, and thence to a circle $S^1$. There is no trouble repeating this process with a second distinct line, except that then we will be a wedge union $S^1 \vee S^1$. Continue inductively, and recall that the wedge union of $n$ circles has the stated fundamental group.

I'm only just starting to really get my head around this stuff, so any feedback would be really useful!

Thanks!

  • 1
    Sounds right : )2012-04-08
  • 1
    This is basically right, though writing down all the details could be messy.2012-04-08
  • 0
    Thanks! I agree the details could be messy, but now at least I know I have the right idea.2012-04-08
  • 1
    Do you mean "minus $n$ lines" like in the title, or "minus $n$ lines through the origin"? There is a significant difference: if the $n$ lines are disjoint then the fundamental group is $F_{n}$ (seen by deformation retracting onto ($\mathbb{R}^2$ minus $n$ points)), but if $n\geq 2$ and they all intersect at the same point then the fundamental group is $F_{2n-1}$ (as shown by user8268)2012-04-08
  • 0
    @you, and in general the fundamental group will depend on the intersection pattern (but I don't see if it will *only* depend on it; probably not—and this should be known, by people who work on subspace arrangements)2012-04-08
  • 3
    You say «There is no trouble repeating this process with a second distinct line». What process? WHat you explain in the case of one line cannot be done when there are two of them!2012-04-08
  • 0
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez, I just mean to say that the title of the thread seems to be misleading, as it doesn't match the question in the main post, and I think there needs to be some clarification as to which question should be answered here.2012-04-08

1 Answers 1

14

There is a deformation retraction of ($\mathbb{R}^3$ minus $n$ lines through the origin) to (the unit sphere with $2n$ points removed). The $2n$ points are the intersections of the lines with the sphere, the deformation retraction is along the rays from the origin.

As a result, the fundamental group is actually $F_{2n-1}$, not $F_n$.

  • 1
    How do you show that the unit sphere with 2$n$ points removed has fundamental group $F_{2n-1}$? Thanks!2012-04-10
  • 1
    Have you heard of stereographic projection? It is a homeomorphism from the complement of a point on $S^n$ to $\mathbb{R}^n$. Relevant link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection2012-04-12
  • 4
    I was asking this question myself too ; I guess the right way to do it is to use one of the $2n$ points as a "north pole" for the stereographic projection, which leaves us with $\mathbb R^2$ with $2n-1$ points removed. Using van Kampen's theorem, we get $F_{2n-1}$. :)2013-09-01