well, In Brian C Halls Book, I am not getting the definition of Matrix Lie group, as he says : A matrix Lie Group is any subgroup $G$ of $GL_n(\mathbb{C})$ with the following property: If $A_m$ is any sequence of matrix in $G$ and and $A_m$ converges to $A$ then either $A\in G$ or $A$ is not invertible. well, That may happen true, but after that page he gave an example of a subgroupof $GL_n(\mathbb{C})$ which is not closed hence not a matrix lie group! could any one tell me clearly what is the definition?
confused in the term "closed" in closed subgroup
1
$\begingroup$
lie-groups
-
1I don't understand what the question is. Hall defined a matrix Lie group and then gave an example of something that was not a matrix Lie group. – 2012-10-08
-
0The first example he gave , he demanded that the limit of the sequence of matrix should be in the group but in the definition he did not claimed that isn't it? I understand clearly!' – 2012-10-08
-
1@Flute: Can you rewrite that comment in English, please? – 2012-10-08
-
0well, just tell me do I need my subgroup closed (topologically) to be a matrix lie group or not? – 2012-10-08
1 Answers
4
The essence of that definition is that the subgroup be closed as a subset of the topological space $GL_n(\Bbb C)$. It will usually not be closed as a subset of the space of all matrices (although it might in some cases be) because $GL_n(\Bbb C)$ itself is not. This is why the exception made is for sequences converging to a non-invertible matrix: within the space $GL_n(\Bbb C)$ such sequences are not convergent at all, so need not be considered for the question of closure.
-
0$GL_n(\mathbb{R})$ is not a matrix Lie Group then right? – 2012-10-08
-
0@Flute: well no, to the contrary, it _is_ a matrix Lie group. Consider a sequence of real invertible matrices that converge to an invertible matrix $A$ (converging to a singular matrix being uninteresting). Then $A$ is also a real (invertible) matrix, as you can easily see, so $GL_n(\Bbb R)$ is a closed subgroup of $GL_n(\Bbb C)$. – 2012-10-08
-
0well, $GL_n(\mathbb{R})$ is not a closed subgroup rather it is dense! – 2012-10-08
-
2@Flute: You are totally confused. How would you approximate a complex (non-real) invertible matrix with real matrices? It cannot be done, so the real matrices are not dense in $GL_n(\Bbb C)$. (Of course $GL_n(\Bbb R)$ is dense in _something_, in itself for instance, but I cannot suppose you meant that.) – 2012-10-08
-
0I finally have understood dear sir, It will be a matrix Lie group if either it is inside $GL_n(\mathbb{C}$ or outside of $GL_n(\mathbb{C}$ – 2012-10-10