4
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the hairbrush example of a fiber bundle from the Wikipedia article on fiber bundles.

If I am understanding this, in the hairbrush example E is the hairbrush, ie. all the bristles with the cylinder they are attached to, B is the cylinder attaching the bristles, F are the bristles, and $\pi$ maps a bristle to the point on the cylinder it is attached to. So is $E$ in this case equal to $B\times F$? Now pick a bristle $x$, and a small neighbourhood $U$ of $\pi(x)$. Then $\pi^{-1}(U)$ are all the bristles attached to the cylinder somewhere in $U$, and does this include $U$ itself?

I think the idea is that the hairbrush looks like a cylinder itself, but I am a bit confused.

  • 0
    Since this can be thought of as the normal bundle, this might be relevant. In this case $E$ is $B\times F$, but you need to know that there is a global trivialization.2012-09-14
  • 0
    $F$ is a single bristle, otherwise I see nothing wrong with your argument. Of course, in a topological setting, there would be an infinite number of infinitely thin bristles, one atached to every point of the cylinger. In addition, any single bristle is a vector space.2012-09-14
  • 0
    So how is $\pi^{-1}(U)\cong B\times F$. $B\times F$ is a cylinder isn't it? Whereas $ $\pi^{-1}(U)$ is just a bunch of bristles...2012-09-14
  • 0
    Because the base space is the surface of the cylinder the bristles are atatched to, and thus infinitely thin. The cylinder together with the bristles makes a thick cylinder, which is the whole space.2012-09-14
  • 0
    @Arthur The fibres of a fibre bundle do not need to be vector spaces. A vector bundle is a more specialized concept.2017-06-26

1 Answers 1