2
$\begingroup$

Consider the region bounded by $x + y = 0$ and $x = y^2 + 3y$.

a) With the washer method, set up an integral of the solid that is rotated about the line x = 4

b) with the shell method, set up an integral expression for the solid rotated about the line y = 1

Solution Provided

a)

$$V = \pi \int_{-4}^{0} (|y^2 +3y| +4)^2 - (4+y)^2 dy$$

www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Pi*Integrate[(4+%2B+|y^2+%2B3y|)^2+-++(4%2By)^2%2C{y%2C-4%2C0}]

The solution I thought would be

$$V = \pi \int_{-4}^{0} (4 - (y^2 +3y))^2 - (4+y)^2 dy$$

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Pi*Integrate[%284+-+%28y^2+%2B3y%29%29^2+-++%284%2By%29^2%2C{y%2C-4%2C0}]

Doesn't the absolute value sign in the integral will actually reflect the region to the fourth quadrant and hence make the +4 meangingless?? More importantly, why is my integral wrong?

Solution Provided

b) $$V = 2 \pi \int_{-4}^{0} (-y - (y^2 + 3y))(y+1) dy$$

I thought it should be $$V = 2 \pi \int_{-4}^{0} (-y - (y^2 + 3y))(1-y) dy$$

The region is below the x-axis, yet when they have y + 1, wouldn't that give me negative radius?

  • 0
    That's odd, I did it on WolframAlpha and it gave me different answers. Also the solution provided for part b) gave me negative volume.2012-02-14
  • 1
    I don't understand what makes you think that "the +4" would become meaningless... now, for $y$ on $[-3,0]$, the two integrals in (a) are identical (since on that interval, $y^2+3y\lt 0$, so $|y^2+3y|=-(y^2+3y)$, hence $4-(y^2+3y) = 4+|y^2+3y|$. But the absolute value seems to be incorrect on the interval $[-4,-3]$. When you say this was "provided", who provided it?2012-02-14
  • 0
    I made a mistake in my original comment, so I deleted it.2012-02-14
  • 0
    The workbook made by our professor...and I am pretty darn sure that cylindrical one is wrong.2012-02-14
  • 0
    So, there's a chance the workbook is incorrect... Perhaps your professor thought he could simplify the first expression by using the absolute value, and did not take into account that $y^2+3y$ is not negative on the entire interval, only for $y\in [-3,0]$. I seem to be gettin the same thing as you for the second one as well.2012-02-14
  • 0
    Do you agree with my integral though? For part a)2012-02-14
  • 0
    I get the same things as you. Because I kind of like integrating with respect to $x$, I interchanged $x$ and $y$, wrote down the integrals. It is all very clear. Even better would be to also change $x$ to $-x$ after interchanging $x$ and $y$. A lot fewer minus signs, can't go wrong. Your instructor has minus sign problems. I don't like negative numbers either. They are so --- *negative*.2012-02-14
  • 0
    @Unh: Yes; that's why I wrote "as well".2012-02-14
  • 0
    Sorry i thought you meant only the cylindrtical shell one. Thanks !2012-02-14
  • 0
    @Unh: I meant that I agree with your integrals in *both*.2012-02-14
  • 0
    It's okay, thank you for your help2012-02-14

1 Answers 1