2
$\begingroup$

Is there a simple algebraic proof?

Thanks!

  • 0
    Well, if you compose a glide reflection with itself, what you get is a translation - which is an isometry. It's not hard to see this on euclidean spaces; even easier in the plane. But to do this with an algebraic proof? Try do proof this using only geometric arguments; if you have a glide reflection then it has a line in which it reflects; this line must divide the plane in two components, in such a way that when you apply the reflection again, the original geometric object which is being reflected is in the original "side" of the plane, but translated.2012-12-12
  • 0
    yeah i checked geometrically, i am trying to solve it algebraically as well by using the fact that Mk composed with Tab = Tab composed with Mk where AB is parallel to the line of reflection k. Tab is a translation and Mk is a reflection across line k AND Mk composed with Tab is glide reflection.2012-12-12

1 Answers 1

1

Let the glide reflection be $T$. Without loss of generality the reflection part of $T$ is reflection in the $y$-axis. Assume that the translation part is by the vector $(a,b)$.

The reflection takes $(x,y)$ to $(-x,y)$. The translation part now takes us to $(-x+a,y+b)$. So $T$ takes $(x,y)$ to $(-x+a,y+b)$.

Do it again. The reflection part takes $(-x+a,y+b)$ to $(x-a,y+b)$, and the translation part takes this to $(x,y+2b)$. So $T^2$ is translation parallel to the $y$-axis by $2b$.

  • 0
    this is more or less correct if I understand your idea correctly(unless you missed the word 'GLIDE REFLECTION') but I need to prove that composition of glide reflection with itself is a translation NOT that two reflections make a translation (that is indeed a very basic result)2012-12-12
  • 0
    I was being sloppy, had vectors in mind but did not saay so. Have rewritten. A glide reflection is a reflection followed by a translation. The algebra above is that if $T$ is a glide reflection, then $T^2$ is a translation parallel to the axis of reflection.2012-12-12
  • 0
    great i see now, thanks!2012-12-12