It seems as though "nice" spaces don't have torsion in their homology groups. What is the underlying characteristic of these nice spaces; that they can be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$? So what are some examples of spaces which can be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$, but have torsion in their homology groups?
Torsion in homology groups of a topological space
11
$\begingroup$
algebraic-topology
-
0If by "spaces" you mean "compact surfaces"... – 2012-06-08
-
6Are you implying the real projective plane is somewhat unnice?! :) – 2012-06-08
-
4If you want to restrict your attention to subsets of $\mathbb R^3$, http://mathoverflow.net/questions/4478/torsion-in-homology-or-fundamental-group-of-subsets-of-euclidean-3-space is quite relevant. In particular, for sensible subsets there is no torsion. – 2012-06-08
-
9Dear user, Just as a pedagogical comment: the apparent phenomenon of homology of "nice" spaces being torsion free is just a reflection of the fact that the first examples one sees are low-dimensional, or very simple spaces such as spheres. It's worth noting that already compact three manifolds will very often have torsion in their $H_1$. Regards, – 2012-06-08
-
2If $G$ is any group, then there is a $2$-dimensional cell complex $X$ with $\pi_1(X) \cong G$; and then $H_1(X)$ is isomorphic to $G$ made abelian. So, as Mariano asks, are these spaces not nice? – 2012-06-08
-
0@RonnieBrown : does a 2-dimensional cell complex corresponding to $G=\Bbb Z/2\Bbb Z$ embed in $\Bbb R^2$ or $\Bbb R^3$? – 2016-08-17