20
$\begingroup$

I am 36 years old, and have forgotten a lot of math from high school, of which I only took up to Algebra 2. However I am teaching myself mathematics and am now, completely fascinated with the logic and beauty of it, but pitiably I am only now beginning to end Algebra 1. I've a long way to go yet, and have the Saxon method at home (Alg.1, Alg.2, Advanced Mathematics (trig and precalc), and Saxon Calculus). So far I like it, as it is what I am accustomed to, having used it in high school.

But my question is if a calc text like Spivak or Apostol would be better than the Saxon Calc. I have found that Saxon is not mentioned in the same circles as Apostol or Spivak.

  • 5
    I wouldn't recommend just sticking with Calculus! Learn some proofs and basic number theory, set theory, topology, convex geometry, etc. There are many interesting topics that are accessible to learn without even knowing Calculus. As far as your question is concerned I would recommend Spivak or Adams-Essex2012-04-05
  • 12
    The quality of Spivak's book is best appreciated by someone who has already done calculus at a more mechanical level.2012-04-05
  • 0
    I agree with the other two - Spivak is the way to go.2012-04-05
  • 0
    Serge Lang wrote a good book.2012-04-05
  • 1
    What do you guys think about Stewart's Calculus?2012-04-05
  • 3
    @Jashin_212 : I think it has a ton of exercises with complete,detailed solutions and that's its' one saving grace that makes it useful to instructors. To students-not so much since it gives a very weak presentation of calculus' basic theory. It's really a book about undergraduate problem solving rather then a calculus book-it's almost like the subject matter is irrelevant to the exercises.2012-04-08

8 Answers 8