1
$\begingroup$

The first three vectors in the following statement are linearly independent. I put this statement into Wolfram Alpha and it tells the 4 vector set is linearly independent

linear independence of {(1,2,0,2), (1,1,1,0), (2,0,1,3),(1,1,1,1)}

However when I used them as columns of a matrix and row reduced it I found they were linearly dependent.

I then used a completely random number for the 4th vector -

linear independence of {(1,2,0,2), (1,1,1,0), (2,0,1,3),(1,20,156,133)}

and it tells me this is linearly independent too. So is Wolfram Alpha wrong?

  • 1
    A "completely random" fourth vector added to a set of three linearly independent vectors would almost always form a linearly independent set - so I'm not surprised by WA's result.2012-04-20
  • 1
    Inputting `MatrixRank[{{1, 2, 0, 2}, {1, 1, 1, 0}, {2, 0, 1, 3}, {1, 1, 1, 1}}]` into Alpha confirms that the four vectors are independent. Can you show what you did in your row reduction?2012-04-20
  • 0
    @J.M. I have found a mistake I made during row reduction. Hmmm, I think I've been confusing linear independence with orthogonality. Is it correct to say that if a vector is orthogonal to other vectors the set is linearly independent, however if a vectors is linearly independent it doesn't necessarily mean that it's orthogonal to the other vectors?2012-04-20
  • 0
    Try using RowReduce[{{1, 2, 0, 2}, {1, 1, 1, 0}, {2, 0, 1, 3}, {1, 1, 1, 1}}]2012-04-20
  • 1
    @Jim_CS Yes, orthogonality is a stronger condition than linear independence. (orthogonal implies linear independence but converse is false)2012-04-20

0 Answers 0