1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that there is a group $G$ and an odd prime $p$. Let $M$ be a $\mathbb{F}_p[G]$ module.

Is it true that $M$ cannot be irreducible but just indecomposible?

Thank you

  • 0
    I have just reread your question and I think it would be useful for you to clarify it: «is it true that $M$ cannot be irreducible but just indecomposable?» is quite obscure...2012-10-22
  • 0
    The statement is that there is no $\mathbb{F}_p[G]$ module $M$, that is irreducible. $M$ can only be indecomposible, but never irreducible.2012-10-22
  • 0
    I still do not understand what you mean. Since there always exist simple modules (for example the trivial one) the only meaning I can imagine for what you write makes it a false statement.2012-10-22
  • 0
    I have here a (very old) article which claims, that in $\mathbb{F}_p$ there are no irreducible representations (this means no irred. $\mathbb{F}_p[G]$ modules), except the trivial, of a finite group $G$ (like the cyclic one you meantioned), but just indecomposible. I'd like to know if this article is correct.2012-10-22
  • 0
    What *is* true is that if $G$ is a $p$-group there is only one irreducible module (up to isomorphism, of course), the trivial one. if $G$ is *not* a $p$-group this is false.2012-10-22
  • 0
    Ok, thanks. Then I try to find more actual literature for group representations over $\mathbb{F}_p$2012-10-22
  • 1
    I doubt the paper is wrong, independently of its age... The result I mentioned has been known for ages. You may be misunderstanding something o missing an hypothesis —telling us what paper it is that you are talking about would probably not hurt! In any case, please fix the question so that it asks what you intended to ask.2012-10-22

2 Answers 2