Am I setting myself up for a fundamental misconception if I consider antidifferentiation denoted by $ \int $ sign as the operation that is the inverse of the differential of a function denoted by $ d $ and that also returns an arbitrary constant $ C $? To make things clear suppose I have a function $F$ where $\frac{d}{dx}F(x)=f(x)$ for all x in some interval. Then it follows $dF(x)=f(x)dx$ now if I have $\int (dF(x))=F(x)+C$ from my definition of antiderivative operation denoted by $\int$ then it also means $\int f(x)dx=F(x)+C$. What do you guys think?
Conventions for antiderivatives notation.
0
$\begingroup$
integration
-
0No, it is indeed an inverse operation. – 2012-05-26
-
0Oh thanks, I guess it's just the notation. For some time, I've wondered how could mathematicians come up with such brilliant notations. I just came around asking; maybe I got it all wrong in my head. – 2012-05-26
-
0@Ilya, I thought the antiderivative was the inverse of the derivative, not the differential... I even posted a question precisely on this. Could you help please? http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1035286/relationship-between-primitive-and-differential?noredirect=1#comment2112879_1035286 – 2014-11-24