Can anyone give me the gist of the difference of the treatment of Stokes' Theorem in Spivak versus baby Rudin (chapter 4 in spivak, chapter 10 in rudin)? I need to do some problems from Rudin but first I need to learn the material so I'm sort of pressed on time. I would prefer to read Spivak if it doesn't make a difference when doing the problems since he seems to use multilinear algebra which I think makes things clearer whereas Rudin's treatment seems a bit ad-hoc. Thanks.
Differential Forms in Spivak vs Rudin
9
$\begingroup$
soft-question
differential-forms
-
0I have the same problem too. – 2012-12-05