3
$\begingroup$

In $\mathbb{Z}_4$, $1$, $2$, $3$ are all units and nilpotents in additive operation; but only 1, 3 are units and 2 is nilpotent in multiplicative operation. I did some experiments like polynomial combination that I might work out a way to prove this, but its complicated. Is there a better way to show this?

  • 0
    Note: "nilpotent in additive operations" makes no sense in a group. You are in a group, every element is invertible.2012-04-06
  • 0
    $(1+2x^k)(1+2x^k)=1$. That's enough units. Nilpotents is simpler.2012-04-06
  • 0
    To complete AndreNicola's: $2x^k$ works for nilpotent :-P2012-04-06
  • 0
    @Andre Why spoil Arturo's hints by doing *all* the work?2012-04-06
  • 0
    @Daniel That's implicit in the equality in Andre's hint, but please see my above comment.2012-04-06

1 Answers 1

5

Establish the following hints.

Hint 1. If $a$ is nilpotent, then $1+a$ is a unit.

Hint 2. If $a$ is nilpotent, then $ab$ is nilpotent for any $b$ that commutes with $a$ and such that $ab\neq 0$.