For example in three dimensional projective space. I thought lines in projective space corresponded to planes in euclidian space. So the space is just the dimension of the Grassmanian $G(2,3)$. Which is $3$. But in a book I'm reading it is said that the dimension must be $4$. What did I do wrong?
The dimension of the space of lines in projective space.
2
$\begingroup$
projective-geometry
-
0You are only counting lines through some fixed point (because that Grassmannian is only counting planes through the origin). – 2012-11-13
1 Answers
2
You are right that lines in $\mathbb{P}^3$ correspond to planes through the origin in an euclidian space. This is because $\mathbb{P}^3$ is a quotient space of such an euclidian space.
However, remember that $\mathbb{P}^3$ is a quotient of an euclidian space of one dimension higher, i.e. a 4-dimensional euclidian space in this case.
Hence the grassmanian you are looking for is $G(2,4)$ instead of $G(2,3)$.
In general lines in $\mathbb{P}^n$ correspond to $G(2,n+1)$.
Even more general linear spaces of dimension $l$ in $\mathbb{P}^n$ correspond to $G(l+1,n+1)$.
-
0$G(2,4)$ has dimension $6$. I quote Miles Reid in Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry, page 102.: "lines of $P^3$ are parametrised by a 4-dimensional variety,". – 2012-11-13
-
1I believe that $G(2,4)$ is actually a subset of $\mathbb{P}^5$ given as the zeroes of $x_0x_1 - x_2x_3 + x_4x_5$. Hence the dimension is 4. – 2012-11-13
-
0You are right, I thought the whole time that the dimension of $G(2,4)$ is just 4 choose 2, which is wrong, it is 4 by the Plucker embedding, right? – 2012-11-13
-
0The polynomial i gave you is the result of the plucker embedding: realizing the grassmanian as an algebraic subspace of a projective space. So yes. – 2012-11-13
-
3For the record: $\dim G(k,n)=k(n-k)$. – 2013-10-07