1
$\begingroup$

I tried to solve this problem in the following way, I just need you to tell me if it's right.

Find a matrix $A$ such that $u$ is in $\operatorname{Null}(A)$. $$u = \begin{bmatrix} 2 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}$$

I found $A$ in the following way:
$$A=\begin{bmatrix} a&\frac{1}{2}u&u \end{bmatrix}$$ where $a = \begin{bmatrix} -2 \\ -3 \\ 3 \end{bmatrix}$
$$A = \begin{bmatrix} -2&1&2 \\ -3&1/2&1 \\ 3&1&2 \end{bmatrix}$$
If I reduce it to reduced row echelon form, $\dim(\operatorname{Null}(A))=1$. Is this the correct solution?

  • 3
    Did you check that $Au=0$? It doesn't seem to be. [The snarky answer to this problem, as written, is $A = 0$, but maybe you want $u$ to span the null space.]2012-01-19
  • 1
    You can check whether your solution is correct, since $u \in Null(A)$ if and only if $Au = 0$. Does $Au = 0$ for your choice of $A$? Also, since the problem doesn't specify you need to use a $3$-by-$3$ matrix, did you consider trying the smallest possible size for $A$? It's always a good practice to seek the simplest examples possible. Does $A$ have to have $3$ rows? Does $A$ have to have $3$ columns?2012-01-19
  • 3
    Is $A=0$ allowed? :-)2012-01-19
  • 0
    @MichaelJoyce I thought that for $u$ to be in $Null(A)$, $u$ has to be in $A$ and not to be an independent vector. So, my solution wasn't correct.2012-01-19
  • 0
    @DylanMoreland I don't know what I want (joking), that's what the problem says. "Find $A$ such that $Null(A)$ contains the vector $u$(listed above)." If you guys, who are more proficient mathematicians don't get it, I don't either.2012-01-19
  • 1
    @Andrew: It seems like you might be confusing $Null(A)$ (the null space of $A$) with $Col(A)$ (the column space of $A$).2012-01-19
  • 1
    $u$ doesn't have to appear anywhere in the matrix $A$. All you need is some matrix $A$ for which $Au = 0$. The matrix $A$ you chose above doesn't do this.2012-01-19

1 Answers 1

3

If you check your solution, you'll see that $A{\bf u}$ is not the zero vector; so, your solution does not work (and would have been happenstance if it did).

What you could use is that if $A{\bf u}=\bf0$, then the linear combination of the columns of $A$ given by the coordinates of $\bf u$ is zero. That is you know, with ${\bf u}=\Bigl[{ \raise1pt\scriptscriptstyle 2\atop{\raise1pt 1 \atop 2}}\Bigr]$, that

$$\tag{1} 2A_1+A_2+2A_3=\bf0, $$ where $A_i$ is the $i^{\rm th}$ column of $A$.

Any matrix $A$ with the appropriate dimensions which satisfies $(1)$ will work. So, just write down a, say, $3\times3$ matrix whose second column is the $-{ 2}$ times the sum of the first and third columns.

  • 0
    $\frac{-1}{2}$? Isn't it $-2$ times the sum?2012-01-19
  • 0
    @Andrew eek... Yes, thank you.2012-01-19