Is there a $p$-adic version of the Riemann hypothesis or this does not make any sense?
Is there a $p$-adic version of the Riemann hypothesis?
5
$\begingroup$
number-theory
p-adic-number-theory
riemann-hypothesis
-
8Like [this](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2003.08.008)? – 2011-10-22
-
0Yes. Can we hope for a motivic analogue too? By the way I can't buy the article, I don't know if you have a copy. – 2011-10-22
-
8What, a copy like [this](http://www.math.uci.edu/~dwan/doug.pdf)? – 2011-10-22
-
0Yes. Thank you very much. – 2011-10-22
-
1@J.M. perhaps combine your comments into an answer? – 2011-10-22
-
0@lhf: Not having $p$-adic expertise, I think I'll let somebody else write a meatier answer. All I did was throw a few terms into Google Scholar... – 2011-10-22
-
3@J.M., evidently that's more than OP did, so go for it. – 2011-10-23
1 Answers
7
(due to insistent public demand)
Is there a $p$-adic version of the Riemann hypothesis?