2
$\begingroup$

I have plotted function $(1+\frac{1}{x})^{x}$ using Maple and got following graph:

enter image description here

So it seems that function isn't defined on $(-1,0)$ interval , but if I take that $x=\frac{-1}{3}$ I can write:

$$y=(1+\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{3}})^{\frac{-1}{3}}=(1-3)^{\frac{-1}{3}}=(-2)^{\frac{-1}{3}}=\frac{1}{(-2)^{\frac{1}{3}}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{-2}}=\frac{-1}{\sqrt[3]{2}}$$

which is real number.So my question is :Is function $(1+\frac{1}{x})^{x}$ defined on $(-1,0)$ interval or not ?

3 Answers 3

0

The expression $x^y$ is defined for $x>0$ if $y\not \in Z $ in the case of real numbers. Otherwise we could write, for example, $-\sqrt[3]{2}=\sqrt[3]{-2}=(-2)^{1/3}=(-2)^{2/6}=\sqrt[6]{(-2)^2}=\sqrt[6]{2^2}=\sqrt[3]{2}$. Contradiction.

Sincerely,

Tigran

2

I guess here there is kind o a philosophical problem: for instance, if you take $x=-\frac{1}{2}$, you face the problem $\sqrt{-1}$. So one can say that there are some points in $(-1,0)$ where the function is defined and some other where is not. In general, it's quite difficult to say a priori which are the right points and so, in order to avoid contradiction, one prefers to exclude $(-1,0)$ from the domain.

This i by the way also what happens for the function $x^x$. One says that its domain is $(0,\infty)$, even if it is clear that it is well defined also for particular negative real numbers.

  • 0
    Let's suppose that I have some number of infected persons among healthy ones..does it mean that I should quarantined all of them because I don't know which of them are infected ?2011-10-30
  • 0
    @pedja: Yes. At least When the non-infected people form a set of measure zero. Also when allowing them to escape the quarantine poses a hazard to public safety!2011-10-30
  • 0
    @pedja: Yes, Jyrki's reason above shows that it would be impossible for a computer to write down a picture. Also because I don't think there is a closed formula to find the non-infected persons.2011-10-30
  • 0
    I will stop thinking about math as an exact science2011-10-30
  • 0
    @Pedja you are wrong in this comment: tell me how a computer could write down a picture of an infinite and bounded set of measure $0$ for which, moreover, there is no closed formula to describe it.2011-10-30
  • 1
    [He, he...](http://peda.com/grafeq/gallery/rogue/xx_exponential.html)2011-10-30
2

Another way to solve this is to allow complex values, and choose the principal value in the usual way. Then your function IS defined and continuous on $(-1,0)$, but has non-real values everywhere there!

Here it is, real part in green, imaginary part in red:

graph

  • 0
    so,I can conclude that function is continuous only if codomain is $\mathbb{C}$ ?2011-10-30
  • 0
    That function in my picture is continuous. Don't know about your "only if" though.2011-10-30