4
$\begingroup$

Is there standard notation for sampling a value from a probability distribution? Like, if I had a random variable $X$, setting $x$ to whatever value I happened to sample from $X$ on this occasion? I was thinking just $x \gets X$, but that seems ambiguous.

  • 0
    Use $X(\omega)=x$.2011-08-12
  • 0
    I'm not sure what you mean by that... are you using $X(\omega)$ as shorthand for doing inverse transform sampling on $X$, with $\omega \sim U(0,1)$? Then I'm left with the same notational need, but for $\omega$.2011-08-12
  • 1
    By definition, a random variable is a [measurable real-valued function on a probability space](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_variable#Formal_definition). Conventionally $\omega$ denotes an outcome, whence the usual mathematical notation for functions $X(\omega)$ is applicable. This is a great mathematical answer, but in another sense it's not an answer at all, because it just pushes back the question to "how was $\omega$ chosen?" But that realization at least forces you to stipulate whether your question is about mathematics or the physical process of sampling.2011-08-12
  • 0
    @whuber, the question is explicitely purely notational (hence neither, *Dieu merci*, about the physics of sampling, nor even about mathematics).2011-08-13
  • 1
    @Didier Yes, but the notation depends on the context. $X(\omega)=x$ would rarely appear in any applied statistics journals, for instance, but is commonplace in the theoretical ones and in the financial literature.2011-08-13
  • 0
    @whuber: Absolutely. Do you have any other suggestion?2011-08-13

0 Answers 0