5
$\begingroup$

nooby question.

  1. I heard many times that 0 is a pair number.
  2. I'm fairly sure that the definition of pair is multiple of 2.
  3. Yet I heard too that multiples of a prime number p are only 1 and p, therefore excluding 0.

So in the above contradiction, where is/are the false argument/s? I feel like despite what I heard, 0 is not a pair number or maybe only in informatics (that I started studying) which is still weird (the divergence I mean)

Thanks for your time.

  • 0
    Yeah even, sorry I'm not English my vocabulary is messed up. And in that regard I think I also mixed up multiple with "divisor" (if that's$a$word).2012-11-29

2 Answers 2

1

Multiples of a prime number (or of any other number) are $\ldots,-2p,-p,0,p,2p,\ldots$ while the divisors of a prime number are only $\pm1,\pm p$ and the positive divisors are just $1,p$. So there is no contradiction.

  • 0
    So yes there was a contradiction among my statements and the argument that was incorrect was the 3rd one. I mixed up multiple and divisor as you pointed out. Thanks, I really am a noob... ^___^2012-11-30
0

There is no contradiction.

  • We say that $k$ is even if there is some $n$ such that $k=2n$. Zero is even because $0=2\cdot 0$.

  • We say that $p$ is a prime number if whenever $p=m\cdot n$ and $m\neq p$ then $m=1$. Zero is not a prime number because $0=3\cdot 0$ and $3\neq 0$ but $3\neq 1$.

While zero itself is not a divisor of any number, in fact we have that any number divides zero. Therefore to the question in the title, yes: zero is a multiple of any number.