Your notation is a bit confusing since you're using lower-case letters for random variables and a capital letter for a constant, whereas it's is conventional to do it the other way around.
Since $t$ is a continuous random variable and $a$ is a constant, $\Pr(t=a)=0$, and $\Pr(t-s>a-T)>0$.
Now here we have something paradoxical: $t-s$ is not exponentially distributed, but rather has the distribution of the sum of two independent exponential random variables, and its expected value is twice as big as the expected interarrival time. If you have some random scheme for choosing some particular interarrival time $X$, that is biased in favor of longer ones (or has any of various other possible sorts of biases), then $\Pr(X\in\text{any particular set})$ may be quite different from what it would be if you didn't have that biased way of picking which interarrival time it is. It may fail to be the probability you'd get from an exponential distribution. And that is what happens in this instance. This is the "inspection paradox". When you pick a time $T$, you're more likely to pick a long interval between arrivals than a short one, so on average you get a longer time than the average interarrival time.
This is called the "inspection paradox". Google that term.