If i have the polynomial expression $(a_1x+b_1y+c_1)^p. (a_2x+a_2y+c_2)^d$, and with assumptions $a_1+b_1<
Multi binomial theorem application
0
$\begingroup$
combinatorics
notation
binomial-coefficients
-
0Thats what i m not sure. Under the assumptions that i have given, we can approximate each of the terms above as (a1/c1)x+(b1/c1)y+1. So should i expand it using multi multinomial theorem? – 2012-07-23
1 Answers
3
I presume that you mean the term $\nu \leq \alpha$? It means the the inequality holds componentwise. So, if $\alpha = (\alpha_1,\cdots,\alpha_d)$, $\nu = (\nu_1,\cdots, \nu_n)$, then $\nu \leq \alpha$ is equivalent to $\nu_1 \leq \alpha_1, \cdots, \nu_n \leq \alpha_n$.
Of course, implicitly the indices $\nu_k$ are also taken to be integers, and each $\nu_k \geq 0$, as well.
A slightly clearer, but less concise, notation would be $0 \leq \nu \leq \alpha$, $\nu \in \mathbb{Z}^d$.
-
0yes. I did mean that v<=alpha. term. thanks. I got it. But still not sure of how to proceed with the expansion. – 2012-07-23