3
$\begingroup$

[Not HW]

Let $\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}$ a sequence of real numbers such that, for all $ n\in\mathbb{N}$ , $0 .

Why the following statements don't imply the convergence of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n}$ :

$\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{n\cdot a_{n}}=1$

and the second one:

$\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}}<1-\frac{1}{n+1}$

For the second one, since the ratio test calls for the $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}}$ to be strictly less than 1, it's obvious that the above statement does not imply convergence, but I didn't find a counterexample neither.

At the exam, I did mark statement 1 as a sufficient condition for convergence, but it's not true. So we need to find $a_{n}$ such that:

  • $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{n\cdot a_{n}}=1$ $\iff$ $\lim_{n\to\infty}n\cdot a_{n}\ln n=0$
  • $0
  • $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n}$ diverges.

I thought of the following sequence:

$a_{n}=\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{16}\dots$

$\sum a_{n}$ clearly diverges but I'm not sure about $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{n\cdot a_{n}}$ .

Thanks guys for your help.

  • 0
    @RijulSaini I guess that's a standard counterexample then (didn't see your comment when answering).2012-08-01

4 Answers 4

1

$\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{na_n}=1\implies \lim_{n\to\infty}na_n\log n=0\implies a_n\to 0$ more rapidly than $n\log n\to\infty\implies $ order of $a_n$ is somewhat "lesser"(don't know if this is the right term) than $n\log n$ ,for example let $a_n=\frac{1}{n^2}$,then $\sum_0^{\infty}a_n$ converges to $\frac{\pi^2}{6}$ while if you take $a_n=\frac{1}{n(\log n)(\log(\log n))}$ then the series diverges. So, both of the above examples of $a_n$ above satisfy $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{na_n}=1$ but in one case the series $\sum_0^{\infty}a_n$ converges and diverges in the other one.

Now for the second part, if $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=1$ (this is your case), then the ratio test fails to tell anything about convergence or divergence of the series. For example, take $a_n=\frac{1}{n}$, and $a_n=\frac{1}{n^2}$; ratio test fails( i.e. $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=1$) for both of these but in first case series diverges while converges in the second one.

  • 0
    $\sum \frac{1}{n(\ln n)^2}$ converges.2012-08-01
3

Taking logarithms, the first condition is equivalent to the fact that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}a_nn\log n=0$. This is not enough to guarantee that $\sum\limits_na_n$ converges, consider for example $a_n=1/(n\log n\log\log n)$ for every $n\geqslant3$.

The second condition is equivalent to the fact that the sequence with general term $na_n$ is strictly decreasing. This is not enough to guarantee that $\sum\limits_na_n$ converges, even with the further condition that $na_n\to0$, consider for example $a_n=1/(n\log n)$ for every $n\geqslant2$.

2

Your example does not work, in fact $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} n^{n\cdot a_n}=\infty$ in its case, as we have $\frac{1}{2n}\leq a_n$ so $n^{n\cdot a_n}\geq \sqrt{n}\to \infty$. An example which does work is $a_n=\frac{1}{n\ln(n)\ln(\ln(n))}$ as $\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{n\cdot a_n}=\lim_{n\to\infty} n^{\frac{1}{\ln(n)\ln(\ln(n))}}=\lim_{n\to\infty}(e^{\ln n})^{\frac{1}{\ln(n)\ln(\ln(n))}}=\lim_{n\to\infty}e^{1/\ln(\ln(n))}=1$ while the sum diverges, according to WolframAlpha.

  • 1
    And by the integral test-the derivative of log composed with itself $n$ times is one over the product of $n,$ $\log(n)$, all the way up to log composed with itself $n-1$ times. In particular this series is the derivative of $log(log(log(n)))$.2012-08-01
2

Your reasoning for the second statement is invalid. While the given condition that $\tag{1}{a_{n+1}\over a_n}<1-{1\over n+1}$ is allowing the possibility that the limit of $a_{n+1}\over a_n$ is 1, the Ratio Test does not imply anything concerning divergence of the corresponding series in this case.

Note that condition $(1)$ is not allowing $a_{n+1}\over a_n$ to approach 1 "too fast". In fact, if we demand the stronger condition that $\tag{2}{a_{n+1}\over a_n}<1-{p\over n+1}$ for some $p>1$ and sufficiently large $n$, then the corresponding series converges. This is known as Raabe's Test (one version of this is excersise 28 here).

With $p=1$, as in your condition, the series may diverge: for example, take take $a_n={1\over n\ln n}$, $n>1$. Then for $n$ sufficiently large, ${a_{n+1}\over a_n}= {n\ln n\over (n+1)\ln (n+1)}<{n\over n+1}=1-{1\over n+1}$. The integral test will show that $\sum{1\over n\ln n}$ is divergent.