5
$\begingroup$

Let $f''$ be continuous on $\mathbb{R}$. Show that

$\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(x+h)-2f(x)+f(x-h)}{h^2}=f''(x)$

My workings

$\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(x+h)-2f(x)+f(x-h)}{h^2}=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)-[f(x)-f(x-h)]}{h^2}=\frac{\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}-\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(x)-f(x-h)}{h}}{\lim_{h\to0}h}$

By the definition of derivative, I move on to the next step. Also, I observe that everything in this question as continuous and differentiable up to $f''(x)$.

$=\frac{f'(x)-f'(x-h)}{\lim_{h\to0}h}$

I do not know how to justify the next move but,

$=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f'(x)-f'(x-h)}{h}$

Then by the definition of derivative again,

$=f''(x-h)$

Which is so close to the answer. So I shall assume that since $h\to0$ for $x-h$, therefore $x-h=x$? And so,

$=f''(x)$

I think i made a crapload of generalization and fallactic errors... I also have another way, which was to work from $f''(x)$ to the LHS. But I realised I assume that the h were the same for $f'(x)$ and $f''(x)$.

Is it normal to be unable to solve this question at the first try? Or am I just too weak in mathematics?

  • 0
    If you have a full solution, do post it — it will be good for you (in case there are any errors to catch), and of course useful to others as well.2012-10-27

5 Answers 5

0

Apply Cauchy mean value theorem for $p(h)=f(x+h)+f(x-h)-2f(x)$, and $g(h)=h^2$, in $[0,h]$, twice.

Since $p(0)=p'(0)=g(0)=g'(0)=0$, you can get

$\frac{p(h)}{h^2}=\frac{p''(z)}{2}=\frac{f''(x+z)+f''(x-z)}{2}\ \text{for z is strictly beteween h and 0}$

Therefore, if you take h goes to zero, then z also goes to zero. Finally, use the contiunuity condition of $f''$.

6

Try applying L'Hospital's Rule to $h$, that is, differentiate with respect to $h$.

6

When you use that $f'(x) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac {f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{2h}$, you get that $f''(x) = \lim_{k \to 0} \lim_{h \to 0} \frac {f(x+h+k)-f(x+h-k)-f(x-h+k)+f(x-h-k)}{4hk}$.

Let $g_x(h,k)$ be that expression : $f''(x) = \lim_{k \to 0} \lim_{h \to 0} g_x(h,k)$, while what you are given is $\lim_{h \to 0} g_x(h/2,h/2)$.
Both limits are going to $(0,0)$ but not along the same path. So it makes sense that they should be equal under certain conditions, namely if the function $g_x$ can be continuously extended at the point $(h=0,k=0)$ and on the two axis $h=0$, $k=0$: then no matter what path you take in your limit to $(0,0)$, you will get the same result.

In order to show that it is the case, you need to use the fact that $f''$ is continuous. Apply the mean value theorem to the functions $g_{x,h} : k \mapsto f(x+h+k) - f(x-h+k)$ : forall $h,k$, there is a $k'$ such that $|k'|\le |k|$ and $g_{x,h}(k) - g_{x,h}(-k) = 2kg'_{x,h}(k')$, which means that $g_x(h,k)$ simplifies to $\frac{g'_{x,h}(k')}{2h} = \frac{f'(x+h+k') - f'(x-h+k')}{2h}$.
Note that with the continuity of $f'$, this implies that for $h \neq 0$, $g_x$ can be continuously extended at $g_x(h,0)$ by $g_x(h,0) = \frac {f'(x+h)-f'(x-h)}{2h}$ (and similarly on the other axis)

Next we can apply the mean value theorem again, to all the functions $h \mapsto f'(x+h+k')$:
forall $h,k$ there are some $h',k'$ such that $|h'| \le |h|, |k'| \le |k|$, and $g_x(h,k) = f''(x+h'+k')$.

Then, we use the continuity of $f''$ to conclude that $\lim_{(h,k) \to (0,0)} g_x(h,k) = \lim_{(h,k) \to (0,0)} f''(x+h'+k') = f''(x)$

2

Apply Taylor's formula in the form $f(x+h) = f(x) + h f'(x) + h^2 f''(x)/2 + o(h^2 f''(x))$.

  • 0
    hey can you explain to me why you wrote $f(x+h) = f(x) + h f'(x) + h^2 f''(x)/2 + o(h^2 f''(x))$ instead of $f(x+h) = f(x) + x f'(x) + x^2 f''(x)/2 + o(x^2 f''(x))$ what is the reason you replaced x with h?2018-01-23
2

Your problem hinges on L'Hospital's Rule for $h$ and the following formula for derivative which known as the symmetric formula

$ f'(x) = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{2h} \,,$

which implies

$ f''(x) = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f'(x+h)-f'(x-h)}{2h}\,. $

See here for details of deriving the above formula.

  • 0
    @SingaporeanDude:you are welcome.2012-10-27