0
$\begingroup$

Prove that the external bisector of an angle of a triangle (not isosceles) divides the opposite side (externally) into two segments proportional to the sides of the triangle adjacent to the angle enter image description here

That is, show $\dfrac{BA}{BC} = \dfrac{B'A}{B'C}$

Here are my questions regarding the wording of this question.

  1. So the triangle (not isosceles) drawn is the black one $\triangle ABC$. The external bisector is the one to angle A. Now when it says "divides the opposite side (externally)", what do they mean by "opposite" here? How do I know that they mean side $BC$ is the opposite side they are referring to? Answered by Andres

  2. I am also guessing when they say two segments, they aren't referring to the trivial side $BC$?

  3. Also when they say "two segments proportional to the sides of the triangle adjacent to the angle", what do they mean by "adjacent to the angle"? What does adjacent here mean? And why is it $AC$ and $AB$? My thinking is that they mean the side that is beside the angle that's being bisected? That is, side $AC$ is one of them? But how is $AB$ side the x subtended by the blue line?

  4. When is "(externally)" in parenthesizes? In Geometry are "extended sides" also considered as "sides"?

If I were to be explicit, is this also equivalent?

$B'C = \alpha BA$

$B'A = \alpha BC$

Dividing them out gives me the result. But how can i assume that the proportionality constant is the same from the wording of the problem

EDIT After a talk with my professor, he just said it's a language and convention accepted. He couldn't give me a better explanation other than that one. So problem is "solved"

Please don't solve the problem. I just want to get used to reading these questions

  • 0
    OK. I expect you are familiar with the analogue for internal angle bisector.2012-10-19

2 Answers 2

0

Where did you get that problem? When the angles at B and C are 45 and 110 degrees respectively, I got in a drawing AB=12.7, AC=9.6, BE=24.5 and BC=5.8 and the relation you gave is evidently not satisfied.

  • 0
    No, you not only changed the naming of the points but also the equation. I was referring to your original post which doesn't correspond to the current one in content. But it isn't worthwhile to argue about things that no longer exist to be verified.2012-10-22
0

Make line parallel to B'B from A and meet at A' on BC. Angle BAA'= BA'A = x. So BA=BA'. Since parallel divide B'C and BC as B'C:B'A = BC:BA' = BC:BA