1
$\begingroup$

                                       enter image description here

The above figure illustrates how the points $Q_0$, $Q_1$, ..., $Q_n$ (with position vectors $\vec R_0$, $\vec R_1$, ..., $\vec R_n$, respectively) partition the curve and generate the inscribed polygonal path, whose length we calculate by summing the lengths of the sides $\left|\Delta\vec R_k\right|=\left|\vec R_k-\vec R_{k-1}\right|$. The length of the curve is then taken to be the limit of these sums, as the partitions are refined in such a manner that the largest length $\left|\Delta\vec R_k\right|$ goes to zero.

Moreover, this limit can be evaluated if the curve is parametrized by $\vec R=\vec R(t)$, $a\leqslant t\leqslant b$. Recall that the interval $[a,b]$ is partitioned $a=t_0 to correspond with the points $\vec R_k=\vec R(t_k)$, and the approximation

$\Delta\vec R_k\approx\frac{d\vec R}{dt}\Delta t_k$

is used to argue that

$\int_C\left|d\vec R\right|\equiv\lim\sum_{k=1}^n\left|\Delta \vec R_k\right|=\lim\sum_{k=1}^n\left|\frac{d\vec R}{dt}\Delta t_k\right|=\int_a^b\left|\frac{d\vec R}{dt}\right|dt$

as the $\Delta t_k$ go to zero.

How is the approximation

$\Delta\vec R_k\approx\frac{d\vec R}{dt}\Delta t_k$

obtained? I am having a hard time understanding the geometrical meaning behind its RHS.

  • 1
    If you want a purely intuitive justification, just imagine a particle flowing along the vector $\frac{d\vec{R_{k}}}{dt}$ for a duration $\Delta t_{k}$ at the point $\vec{R_{k}}$. You can convince yourself that you "land" reasonable close to the next $\vec{R_{k+1}}$, or in other words, the approximation above holds. You can then prove analytically that the approximation converges as $\Delta t_{k}\to0$ if the curve itself is sufficiently smooth.2012-11-10

0 Answers 0