2
$\begingroup$

I stumbled upon this question in an old exam (I'm preparing for an exam of a course about ODEs). I didn't have much difficulty solving the Legendre and Hermite equations using power series, but this one is different.

First of all, can you say this is a Bessel equation? Generally that would be $x^2u''+xu'+(x^2-w^2)u = 0$ which is quite similiar to my equation $x^2u''+xu'-(x^2+\frac{1}{4})u=0$ except for the minus-sign for the $x^2$. My usual approach is just expanding $u(x)$ as a power series, i.e. $u(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n$ and then substituting $u$, $u'$ and $u''$ into the original equation, in this case resulting in

$\sum_{n=0}^\infty n(n-1)a_n x^n + \sum_{n=0}^\infty n \, a_n x^n - \frac{1}{4} \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n x^n - \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n x^{n+2}$

It's also possible to start the first summation at $2$ and the second one at $1$.

The actual question is: Determine two independent solutions in the form of a power series about $x=0$. Provide the general expression for both power series and determine the functions they represent.

Any hints on how to continue?

[Edit]: My approach would be to combine the four summations into one, and try to rewrite all powers of $x$ to $x^n$. Therefore, the summation with $x^{n+2}$ should be rewritten to start at $2$, resulting in $x^n$ with coefficients $a_{n-2}$. But when this summation starts at $2$, the others should too. As I already mentioned, the first one can be chosen to start at $2$, but the second one starts at either $0$ or $1$ and the third summation starts at $0$.

  • 0
    It's been a while since I've played with power series solutions...isn't this the type of problem where the method of Frobenius should be used?2012-06-16

0 Answers 0