Suppose a symmetric matrix $L\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ is given, and a rectangular matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times m}$, $m
Under which conditions on $A$ (or $A^T$) can the solution to (2) be obtained by solving (1) (by eliminating $A^T$ from the second)? In other words, is it safe to replace solving (1) by solving (2), or vice versa?
I suppose that in case $A^T$ is non-invertible the solution to the first and the second system differ. What is the condition in a general case of rectangular $A$? What about square symmetric $A=A^T$?
.....................................................
The question reduces to: could one replace solving (1) by solving (2), or vice versa? Why couldn't one replace solving (2) by solving (1)? If a solution to (1) exists, then it is also a solution to (2). Could it be that the solution to (1) does not exits (ie, exists only in LS sense), but the exact solution to (2) exists?