6
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be a field. Assume that you already know that the category $\mathrm{Alg}(k)$ of $k$-algebras (everything here is commutative and unital) has a coproduct $\sqcup$. But you don't know that this actually comes from the tensor product of vector spaces over $k$. You just know the universal property of $A \sqcup B$ (aka $A \otimes_k B$). From this you can deduce:

  • $\sqcup$ is commutative and associative up to natural isomorphisms
  • $(A/I) \sqcup B \cong (A \sqcup B) / \langle i_A(I) \rangle$
  • $A \sqcup k[x_1,\dotsc,x_n] \cong A[x_1,\dotsc,x_n]$
  • $A \sqcup -$ commutes with colimits

In particular, we can compute the tensor product of arbitrary algebras using presentations: $k[\{x_i\}]/I \sqcup k[\{y_j\}]/J \cong k[\{x_i\},\{y_j\}]/\langle I,J \rangle$

Question. How can we prove that for every injective homomorphism $\phi : A \to B$ of $k$-algebras the induced homomorphism $\phi \sqcup \mathrm{id} : A \sqcup C \to B \sqcup C$ is also injective for every $k$-algebra $C$?

For example, this is clear when $C$ is a polynomial algebra over $k$. In general, $C$ is free as a module over $k$, but we cannot use the isomorphism $C \cong k^{(I)}$ since this leaves the category of $k$-algebras.

Background: I assist a lecture where the students have just learned what the tensor product of algebras is, without knowing the tensor product of modules. Now they have to believe somehow some of the well-known properties, because they are usually proven with the help of the tensor product of modules. But perhaps we can do it with algebras alone. Since the lecture is about elementary algebraic geometry, you may assume that $k$ is algebraically closed and some basic results about affine varieties (but not about their fiber products ;)).

Appendix: Further properties which follow from the universal property:

1) Let us denote the coproduct inclusions by $i_A : A \to A \sqcup B$ and $i_B : B \to A \sqcup B$. It is easy to see that $\otimes : A \times B \to A \sqcup B, (a,b) \mapsto i_A(a) \cdot i_B(b)$ is $k$-bilinear and that the span of the image generates $A \sqcup B$ (since the image satisfies the same universal property).

2) When $A,B \neq 0$, then we also have $A \otimes_k B \neq 0$. Geometrically: The fiber product of two non-empty schemes is non-empty.

Proof: Since the zero algebra only maps to the zero algebra, we may replace $A,B$ by quotients. In particular, we may assume that $A,B$ are field extensions of $k$. Let $P$ be a transzendence basis of $A/k$ and $Q$ one of $B/k$. Let $M$ be a set containing disjoint copies of $P$ and $Q$ and let $C$ be the algebraic closure of $k(M)$. Then there are maps $A \to C$ and $B \to C$, which induce by the universal property a map $A \sqcup B \to C$. Since $C \neq 0$, we also have $A \sqcup B \neq 0$.

  • 1
    At Qiaochu: Yes, first line in my question. At Mariano: This is not my question. And there is not "the reason". I know what you can read in textbooks. At Hurkyl: When you are not interested, you don't have to care for this question.2012-05-22

2 Answers 2

2

Here is a geometric argument that will prove something slightly weaker. I assume that $k$ is algebraically closed. I will use letters $A,B, C$ to denote $k$-algebras, and $X,Y,Z$ to denote corresponding algebraic sets.

  • Show that the set of (closed) points of the product is the product of the sets of closed points. (Easy from the universal property of $\otimes_k$.)

  • Show that if $X \to Y$ is surjective, then so is $X \times Z \to Y \times Z$. (Follows from the first point.)

  • Show that if $U \hookrightarrow X$ is an open immersion, say of a distinguished open $D(f)$, then the same is true of $U\times Z \hookrightarrow X \times Z$. (Should be easy enough.)

  • Show that if $A \to B$ is injective, then the map of varieties $X \to Y$ is dominant (i.e. contains a dense open subset of the image), and conversely, provided that $A$ and $B$ are reduced.

  • Now suppose that $X \to Y$ is dominant. We may find $V \hookrightarrow Y$ distinguished open, with preimage $U \hookrightarrow U$ distinguished open, so that $U \to V$ is surjective. Then $U \times Z \to V \times Z$ is surjective. Now it should be easy to deduce that $X \times Z \to Y \times Z$ is dominant.

  • Going back to $k$-algebras, we've shown that $A \to B$ injective implies $A \otimes_k C \to B \otimes_k C$ is injective, up to nilpotents.

Dealing with nilpotents will be trickier.


Added in response to the OP's request for more details on the 2nd last point:

Let $\varphi:X \to Y$ denote the given dominant map. This means that the image of $\varphi$ is dense, and so (e.g. by Chevalley's theorem) contains a dense open subset, and hence a distinguished dense open subset, of $Y$.

Choose a distinguished open $V:= D(f)$ in $Y$ contained in the image of $X$. Let $f' : = f \circ \varphi$ be the pull-back of $f$ to $X$ and let $U = D(f')$ (a distinguished open in $X$).

Now $x \in U$ iff $f'(x) \neq 0$ iff $(f \circ \varphi)(x) \neq 0$ iff $f(\varphi(x)) \neq 0$ iff $\varphi(x) \in V$, and so $U = \varphi^{-1}(V)$. As $V \subset \varphi(X)$, we certainly have that $\varphi(\varphi^{-1}(V)) = V$, and so $\varphi: U \to V$ is surjective, as required.

  • 0
    The argument uses localization, but I don't think it uses flatness of tensor product over a field. I'm sure you can find a more geometric proof, anyway, in the spirit of the argument above. If it turns out that you need it and can't sort out the details yourself, I can try to think about it. Apologies again, I'm so used to it as a basic fact of life about dominant maps that I forgot it needed proof! Regards,2012-05-24
-1

I come also here to bore you...

ANyway, you know that the achievement is true iff $k$ is a field, but your points are true also for a general commutative rings $k$. THen you need some "Extra" points:

1)You have a functor $U: Alg_k\to Vect_k$ that map any monomorphism is a section,

2) Exist a bifuctor $B: Vect_k\times Vect_k\to Vect_k$ such that $U\circ (A\coprod C)\cong B(U(A), B(C)$ (naturally in $A, C$)

from this you prove your claim.