0
$\begingroup$

A continuous real-valued function $f: A \to B$, such that $A, B \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ where $f(0)=1$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} f(x)=-1$ must have a zero within $(0,\infty)$

However, if an asymptote existed at some $x = \alpha$, where $\alpha \notin A$ such that $f(x) \to \infty$ as $x \to \alpha^{+}$ and $f(x) \to -\infty$ as $x \to \alpha^{-}$, and in the interval $(\alpha, \infty)$, the function approaches the limit $f(x) = -1$ as $x \to \infty$, isn't there a possibility that a zero does not exist within $(0,\infty)$, thus disproving the statement?

EDIT: Also, what if $\alpha \notin A$ such that $f(x) \to \infty$ as $x \to \alpha^{-}$ and $f(x) \to -\infty$ as $x \to \alpha^{+}$? Sorry for the edit again.

  • 0
    @Beni: Sorry, I intended for the edit to be a second part to the question.2012-03-17

3 Answers 3

1

I will assume that $A=[0,+\infty)$. From definition of limit $ \lim\limits_{x\to+\infty} f(x)=-1\Longleftrightarrow \forall\varepsilon>0\quad\exists\delta>0\quad\forall x\quad(x>\delta\Longrightarrow|f(x)+1|<\varepsilon) $ Take $\varepsilon=1/2$ and for respective $\delta>0$ consider point $x_0=2\delta>\delta$, Then you get $f(x_0)<-1+\varepsilon<-1/2$.

Since $f$ is continuous on $[0,+\infty)$ it is continuous on $[0,x_0]$ and moreover $f(0)=1>0$, $f(x_0)<-1/2<0$. Then by Intermediate value theorem there exist $c\in[0,x_0]\subset[0,+\infty)$ such that $ f(c)=0. $

On the other hand if $A\subset[0,+\infty)$ then we can construct a counterexample. Indeed consider function $ f(x)=-\frac{x+1}{x-1} $ defined on $A=[0,1)\cup(1,+\infty)$ It is easy to check that $ \lim\limits_{x\to+\infty}f(x)=-1, \qquad f(0)=1 $ But there is no $c\in[0,1)\cup(1,+\infty)$ such that $f(c)=0$. This is my counterexample.

0

From your question it seems that $[0,+\infty)\subset A$. A continuous function $f\colon[0,+\infty)\to\mathbb{R}$ cannot have a vertical asymptote at a point $\alpha\in(0,+\infty)$; such an $\alpha$ would be a point of discontinuity.

  • 0
    Yes, it still applies.$A$continuous function $f\colon A\subset\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ cannot have a vertical asymptote at an interior point of $A$.2012-03-17
0

It seems the situation you have in mind is when $f$ is defined and continuous on $(0,a)\cup(a,+\infty)$, $f(x)\to+\infty$ when $x\to a^+$ and $f(x)\to-1$ when $x\to+\infty$ (the other hypotheses being irrelevant). Then yes, there exists $x^*$ in $(a,+\infty)$ such that $f(x^*)=0$.

The proof uses the intermediate value theorem and is as follows. First, since $f(x)\to+\infty$ when $x\to a^+$, there exists $x_1$ in $(a,+\infty)$ such that $f(x_1)\geqslant1$. Second, since $f(x)\to-1$ when $x\to+\infty$, there exists $x_2$ in $(x_1,+\infty)$ such that $f(x_2)\leqslant-\frac12$. Now, $f$ is continuous on $[x_1,x_2]$ and $f(x_1)\gt0\gt f(x_2)$, hence by the usual intermediate value theorem there exists $x^*$ in $(x_1,x_2)$ such that $f(x^*)=0$.

Edit: If the hypotheses are modified (drastically) and one now assumes that $f$ is defined and continuous on $[0,a)\cup(a,+\infty)$ with $f(0)=1$, $f(x)\to+\infty$ when $x\to a^-$, $f(x)\to-\infty$ when $x\to a^+$ and $f(x)\to-1$ when $x\to+\infty$, then there is no reason to believe there exists $x^*$ in $[0,a)\cup(a,+\infty)$ such that $f(x^*)=0$. In fact, the behaviour of $f$ on $[0,a)$ and its behaviour on $(a,+\infty)$ are unrelated and, on both intervals, the sign of $f$ may be constant.

For a specific example, consider $f(x)=\frac{a}{a-x}$ for every $0\leqslant x\lt a$ and $f(x)=\frac{x}{a-x}$ for every $x\gt a$.

  • 0
    "First, since $f(x) \to +\infty$ when $x\to a^{+}$ there exists $x_1$ in $(a, +\infty)$ such that f(x_1) > 1", but in the revised version, is this necessarily true?2012-03-17