1
$\begingroup$

I have the following question:

Using my calculator, $\displaystyle\int_0^{0} \frac{1}{x}dx$ is "undefined".

But when I type $\displaystyle\int_0^{0} - \frac{\ln(1-t)}{t} dt$, the result is 0.

What is the difference?

  • 0
    The one-point set $\{0\}$ over which you are integrating is zero measurable: so any measurable function should yield $0$ when integrating over it. However, neither of these functions are defined at $0$, so I think the answer should be "undefined" for both integrals.2012-05-24

1 Answers 1

4

It may be there's no "right answer". The hyperbola $\,1/x\,$ isn't defined at zero (it is in fact a discontinuity point of the second kind of the function), so it seems "obvious" that its definite integral from zero to zero makes no sense. OTOH, the same happens with $\,\displaystyle{-\frac{\log(1-t)}{t}}\,$ , but in this case the disc. point is removable, as $\lim_{t\to 0}-\frac{\log(1-t)}{t}=1$Perhaps this is what matters to your computer...

  • 0
    That's what I thought. Maybe the calculator tries to compute something like $\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int_{0}^{\epsilon} f(x)$ which does not work for $f(x) = 1/x$ but does work for $f(x) = -\log(1-x)/x$.2012-05-24