0
$\begingroup$

Let $f:[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is such that for every sequence $x_n\in [0,1]$, whenever both $x_n$ and $f(x_n)$ converges , we have $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} f(x_n)=f(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}x_n),$ we need to prove $f$ is continuous

well, I take $x_n$ and $y_n$ in $[0,1]$ such that $|(x_n-y_n)|\rightarrow 0$, and the given condition holds,Now enough to show $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|\rightarrow 0$

I construct a new sequence $z_1=x_1$ $z_2=y_1$ $\dots$ $z_{2n-1}=x_n$ and $ z_{2n}=y_n$

We see, that subsequence of $f(z_n)$ converges so it must be convergent to the same limit. Am I going in right path? please help.

  • 0
    Consider the function $f$ on $[0,1]$ defined by $f(0)=0$ and $f(x)=1/x$ for all $x \in (0,1]$. Then it satisfies the hypothesis but is not continuous on $[0,1]$. So the claim is false. The claim is false because the antecedent requires both $(x_n)$ and $(f(x_n))$ to be convergent. And for all $(x_n)$ that converges to $0, (f(x_n))$ is not convergent and hence the antecedent is false. Therefore the implication stands true, yet the function is not continuous on $[0,1]$!2012-07-09

1 Answers 1

0

I will prove a different claim because I have pointed out that what is mentioned here is wrong by a counter-example.

Let $f:[0,1]→\mathbb{R}$ is such that for every sequence $x_n∈[0,1]$ whenever $(x_n)$ converges , we have $ \lim\limits_{n→∞}f(x_n)=f \left(\lim\limits_{n→∞}x_n \right)$ then $f$ is continous on $[0,1]$.

I think the best way is to use proof by contradiction. Assume $f$ is not continuous at $c \in [0,1]$ then there exist $ \epsilon_{0} > 0 $ such that for all $ n \in \mathbb{N} $ there exist $ x_{n} \in (c-1/n,c+1/n) \cap [0,1] $ such that $|f(x_n)-f(c)| \geq \epsilon_{0}>0 $

Obviously $ ( x_n )$ converges to $c$ but $(f(x_n)) $ does not converge to $f(c)$ ( Note that all the terms of $(f(x_n))$ are a positive distance away from $f(c)$ ) which is a contradiction with the given property of the function.

Since our choice of $c$ was arbitrary, we have that $f$ is continuous on $[0,1]$

  • 0
    Consider the function $f$ on $[0,1]$ defined by $f(0)=0$ and $f(x)=1/x$ for all non-zero $x$. Then it satisfies the hypothesis but is not continuous on $[0,1]$. So the claim is false. What I have proven is the sequential criterion for continuity!2012-07-09