0
$\begingroup$

Find an uncountable number of subsets of $\ell_{n}^{p}(\mathbb{R})$ and $\ell_{n}^{p}(\mathbb{C})$ that are neither open nor closed.

Attempt: For $\ell_{n}^{p}(\mathbb{R})$ , take the collection of sets $A_n=(n,n+1$] with $\mathbb{R}$ as the index set.

For $\ell_{n}^{p}(\mathbb{C})$ , since $\mathbb{R\subset\mathbb{C}}$, wouldn't the same subsets I use for $\ell_{n}^{p}(\mathbb{R})$ work?

  • 0
    Usually, $\ell^p$ is used to denote that the metric is $d(x,y)=\bigl(\sum |x_i-y_i|^p\bigr)^{1/p}$. What you have above is denoted by $\ell^\infty$. All these metrics induce equivalent norms, however.2012-01-31

1 Answers 1

2

Elements in $\ell_n^p$ are sequences with $n$-coordinates. I do not think your $A_n$ will work.

Hint: Think of closed balls with their centers deleted: $\overline B_\epsilon(x)/\{x\}$, where $x\in\ell_n^p$. None of these are open since no open ball containing a boundary point of $\overline B_\epsilon(x)/\{x\}$ is contained in $\overline B_\epsilon(x)/\{x\}$. And none are closed since $x$ is a limit point of $\overline B_\epsilon(x)/\{x\}$ not contained in $\overline B_\epsilon(x)/\{x\}$.

  • 0
    Ah, now I see why my original argument was insufficient. So if these balls are neither open nor closed in $\ell_{n}^{p}(\mathbb{R})$ they are also neither open nor closed in $\ell_{n}^{p}(\mathbb{C})$ since $\mathbb{R}\subset\mathbb{C}$, right?2012-02-01