4
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to prove Goodstein's theorem without transfinite induction? Is there such a proof?

  • 1
    You might in general be interested in *reverse mathematics*, which studies the amount of induction (and other axioms) needed in many theorems.2015-07-01

2 Answers 2

6

I'm pretty sure the short answer is "no" (if you mean, can you prove Goodstein's theorem without invoking apparatus as strong as a transfinite induction which can't be reduced to an ordinary induction). For if I recall correctly, Goodstein's theorem is actually equivalent (over a weak base theory) to transfinite induction up to $\varepsilon_0$. My first port of call to check this would be Kirby and Paris's paper on 'Accessible independence results for Peano Arithmetic'.

  • 1
    I can't tell if you are just being modest, but the phrasing of your reply suggests some uncertainty. If so, please let me assure you that I believe that your answer is exactly correct.2012-12-17
1

I found the following paper which seems fairly relevant:

Miller J.T. On the independence of Goodstein’s theorem. 2001, Citeseer.

  • 0
    @rank: Look at the section about the independence itself. This means that you cannot prove the theorem from first-order PA without some extra assumptions, which are ultimately equivalent to the transfinite induction.2012-12-17