I have $n$ tasks that I wish to delegate to $m$ independent individuals, where $m$ is a factor or divisor of $n$. Each of the tasks $T_{1} ... T_{n}$ is independent. From the following two extremes, which or what in between, is the optimal solution?
1) Highest quality, least efficient: assign $T_{1}$ to all $I_{j}$ (where $j = 1, 2, 3,..., m$) and choose the best result; move onto $T_{2}$ and do similarly; repeat for all $T_{i}$ (where $i = 1, 2, 3,..., n$).
2) Most efficient, lowest quality: assign $T_{1}$ to $I_{1}$, $T_{2}$ to $I_{2}$, and so on for $T_{m}$ to $I_{m}$. Decide which results are of sufficient quality, then assign $T_{m+1}$ to $I_{1}$, $T_{m+2}$ to $I_{2}$ and so on until $T_{n}$ is assigned to $I_{n}$
The primary objective is to get as many $T$ finished and of satisfactory quality in a given time $t$.