4
$\begingroup$

I am new in category theory. I am trying to prove the well known fact that if you have a commutative diagram of the form □□, where each square is a pullback, then the whole diagram is a pullback too, and hence deduce that the pullback of a pullback square is a pullback. Every book I have looked at has this as an exercise, but I (embarrasingly, I know) cannot see the solution. I have tried using the universality property of the two pullbacks but i am lost in calculations. If someone could help, I would really appreciate it.

  • 0
    You migh$t$ also $t$ry posting your work up to the point where you get lost in calculations; then someone might help you find your way out again.2012-05-30

2 Answers 2

16

Just for you, and it turns out my answer has to contain at least 30 characters, so let's make it 100.

  • 1
    Thanks for a citeable reference for this proof! Trivial nitpick: $m = m' = n' \circ f$ on page 2 should be $m = m' = f \circ n'$.2015-06-30
4

My advice: try once more. The pullback property for the big square (or rectangle) really follows from the pullback properties of the two small squares.

Hint: Start with the right hand square. Can you see two arrows as in the condition of the pullback property?