3
$\begingroup$

$A, B, C$ are independently sampled from an uniform distribution in $[0, 1]$.

We know $P(A > B) = 0.7, P(B > C) = 0.6$, what is $P(A > C)$?

Is this a well defined problem? Does it have a sensible answer?

EDIT: Suppose we have two careless observers. An observer observes $A > B$ and there are 70% probability that she is right. Another observer observes $B > C$ and there are 60% probability that she is right. So what is the probability of $A > C$ in the underlying event?

  • 0
    There is a potentially interesting Bayesian problem here, struggling to get out.2012-05-05

2 Answers 2

2

I wrote following MATLAB code. Simulation results show the probability is around 0.602. I hope someone could confirm this with an analytic answer.

N = 1000000;  A = rand(N, 1); B = rand(N, 1); C = rand(N, 1);  p1 = 0.7; p2 = 0.6;  c1 = rand(N, 1); c2 = rand(N, 1);  ob1 = ((A > B) & (c1 < p1)) | ((A < B) & (c1 > p1)); ob2 = ((B > C) & (c2 < p2)) | ((B < C) & (c2 > p2));  ob = ob1 & ob2;  pos = ob & (A > C);   sum(pos) / sum(ob) 

=======================update==============================

I enumerate all the 6 possibilities of relative order of $A, B, C$. They all appear with probability 1/6.

The following lists shows with how much probability each case passes the two observers

  • $A>B>C$, $0.7\times 0.6$

  • $A>C>B$, $0.7\times 0.4$

  • $B>A>C$, $0.3\times 0.6$

  • $B>C>A$, $0.3\times 0.6$

  • $C>A>B$, $0.7\times 0.4$

  • $C>B>A$, $0.3\times 0.4$

Among them, $A>B>C$, $A>C>B$, $B>A>C$ are the valid cases. So

$\frac {0.7\times 0.6+0.7\times 0.4+0.3\times 0.6} {0.7\times 0.6+0.7\times 0.4+0.3\times 0.6+0.3\times 0.6+0.7\times 0.4+0.3\times 0.4} = 0.6027$

  • 0
    +1: Despite the downvoting, the simulated answer and the maths is absolutely correct, under the assumption that the values of A,B and C are independent of the observed probabilities. Nice job.2012-05-05
0

Ah. It depends strongly on the method for making those probabilistic observations.

For example: If we observe that A=0.7, then we should note P(A>B)=0.7.

If we observe that C=0.4, then we should note P(B>C)=0.6.

(This is perhaps the most obvious, natural way of accessing those probabilities. An observation of B would affect both probabilities)

And, if those were our observations, then it's absolutely guaranteed that A>C. P(A>C) = 1.

  • 0
    As I said, it depends on the method of making the probabilistic observations. What I said is consistent with the observations, and I would argue is the most natural way for those observations to occur, but there are other possible cases.2012-05-05