1
$\begingroup$

Let one piece of literature be one string. Let's define our alphabet to be sufficient to represent all literature (e.g. we may need a page-turn character, etc). So, since the collection of current literature is finite, it is a regular language. However, we usually talk about such languages as context sensitive and natural which are harder for a computer to deal with. So, what am I missing here?

Thanks.

  • 0
    Especially since humans are not reliably able to parse this kind of sentences after each other.2012-03-22

0 Answers 0