2
$\begingroup$

What is the cardinality of the set $A=\{ P| P\ \text{is a countable partition of the reals} \}$ ? I am searching on this for a while. I think the cardinality is $2^w$ where $w$ is the cardinality of $\mathbb{N}$. Clearly $|A|\geq |\mathbb{R}|=2^w$, but I cannot prove the other direction. I tried (but did not succeed)to construct an injection $A \rightarrow C$ for some set $C$ with cardinality equal to $2^w$.

  • 0
    Related is the 17-18 March 2011 sci.math thread *The cardinality of the collection of all partitions of the natural numbers equals that of the real numbers.* See [my response](http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7409356) and [Fred Galvin's](http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7409624) follow-up comments.2012-06-25

3 Answers 3

4

I think it's not very hard. A countable partition of reals can be seen as just a function from the reals into natural numbers, up to a permutation of the naturals. So we have $\lvert \mathbf N^{\mathbf R}\rvert=\aleph_0^{2^{\aleph_0}}=2^{2^{\aleph_0}}$ (because $\aleph_0\leq 2^{\aleph_0}$ we can do the last substitution)

On the other hand, there are only $\aleph_0^{\aleph_0}=\mathfrak c<2^{\mathfrak c}$ permutations of natural numbers, so there are $2^{2^{\aleph_0}}$ equivalence classes of functions from reals to naturals under the relation of equivalence up to a permutation of naturals (because each has at most $\mathfrak c$ elements), which are precisely correspondent to the countable partitions of reals.

  • 1
    @aerdna91: you are. You only used that the classes are smaller than or equal to lambda in the very first step: that $\lvert X\rvert\leq\lvert X/\sim\rvert\cdot \lambda$. In the final step you use that \lambda<\lvert X\rvert.2014-02-18
3

What is a countable partition? It means that we have some function from $\mathbb R$ into $\mathbb N$ and every part in the partition is the fiber of such function. However counting like this we count many partitions several times, for example take a partition into two parts, then we can see it as a function whose range is $\{0,1\}$ or $\{2,3\}$ or any other pair of numbers.

However note that there are exactly $2^{\aleph_0}$ many ways to re-order the natural numbers therefore at most continuum many functions generate the same partition.

So we have $\aleph_0^{2^{\aleph_0}}=2^{2^{\aleph_0}}$ many functions and each is equivalent to at most $2^{\aleph_0}$ many of them. Therefore there are $2^{2^{\aleph_0}}$ many partitions.

Why can't there be another number? Well, we denote by $\frak p$ the cardinality of all countable partitions, then we have that $2^{2^{\aleph_0}}=2^{\aleph_0}\cdot\frak p$, by the general argument appearing in Does $k+\aleph_0=\mathfrak{c}$ imply $k=\mathfrak{c}$ without the Axiom of Choice? we have that $2^{2^{\aleph_0}}=\frak p$.

1

Hint: how many subsets does $\mathbb R$ have? Can't (almost) all of them be part of a partition?

  • 0
    @nullUser: are you saying the elements of the partition need to be open sets or something like that? I was just taking $\mathbb R$ to be a collection of size $\mathfrak c$ and partitioning it arbitrarily.2012-06-24