Im unsure of how to go about solving these when given a set of
Given
$f= \{(-2,4),(0,-2),(1,2),(2,3)\}$ and $g(x)= 3x-5$
Find
A) $f(-2)$
B) $(f+g)(2)$
C) $f(g(x))$
D) $f(1)-g(1-k)$
In each case Iām not sure how to calculate the $f$ values.
Im unsure of how to go about solving these when given a set of
Given
$f= \{(-2,4),(0,-2),(1,2),(2,3)\}$ and $g(x)= 3x-5$
Find
A) $f(-2)$
B) $(f+g)(2)$
C) $f(g(x))$
D) $f(1)-g(1-k)$
In each case Iām not sure how to calculate the $f$ values.
The part I think you are missing is that $f$ is a function which is defined only at the values -2, 0, 1, and 2, and nowhere else. $f(-2) = 4$, which is the answer to part (A); $f(2) = 3$, from which you can easily solve part (B); $f(1) = 2$, from which you can solve part (D).
This leaves only part (C), to determine $f(g(x))$. $f$ is defined only at -2, 0, 1, and 2, so the composite function $f(g(x))$ is defined only at values of $x$ where $g(x)$ is one of -2, 0, 1, or 2. If $x$ is such that $g(x)$ comes out to something else, say 37, then that is an invalid argument for $f$, and the entire expression $f(g(x))$ is undefined. So what you need to do is make a list of the few values of $x$ that make $g$ yield a good argument for $f$, and then you can describe the behavior of the resulting $f(g(x))$ function in a way similar to the way that $f$ itself was described.
In principle, all functions can be described as a list (possible a very large infinite list) of ordered pairs in this way. In some contexts in mathematics we take an ordinary function like $g(x) = 3x -5$ and define it as the infinite set $\{\ldots, (-2, -11), (-1, -8), (0, -5), (1, -2), \left(1\frac13, -1\right), \\ (2, 1), (\pi, 3\pi-5), \ldots, (57.89, 168.67), \ldots \}.$ The function $f$ here is no different in principle; it just has a much smaller domain.
A) $f(-2) = 4$
B)$(f+g) (2) = 4$
D) $f(1)-g(1-k) = 2 - (3(1-k) - 5) $