0
$\begingroup$

My working so far:

$71-1=70$ and Prime factors of $70$ are $2 \times 5 \times 7$

Check $a=7$:

$7^{(\frac{70}{2})} \equiv 7^{35} \equiv x (mod 71)$

How do I find $x$? Usually I would use Fermat's little theorem and firstly find $\phi(71)$ except 71 is prime (giving the value as $71-1=70$ but this is a fact that we're trying to prove in the first place!!

I could of course use my calculator to calculate it, but this assumes the numbers aren't too extremely horrible.

How else do you calculate this nicely?

2 Answers 2

1

You can use repeated squaring to get to large powers quickly, then use binary to write the exponent as a sum of exponents you've already reached: $7^1 = 7 \equiv 7\pmod{71}$ $7^2 = 49 \equiv 49\pmod{71}$ $7^4 = 49^2 \equiv 58\pmod{71}$ $7^8 = 58^2 \equiv 27\pmod{71}$ $7^{16} = 27^2 \equiv 19\pmod{71}$ $7^{32} = 19^2 \equiv 6\pmod{71}$ $7^{35}=7^{32}7^27^1\equiv 6\cdot 49\cdot 7\equiv 70\pmod{71}$ It's still a lot of work, but it's much less than multiplying $7$ by itself $35$ times, even if you reduce mod $71$ each time.

  • 0
    You can also use simplifications like $7^4 \equiv 58 \equiv -13\pmod{71}$ and then $7^5 = 7 \times 7^4 \equiv -91 \equiv -20\pmod{71}$ and then $7^{35}=(7^5)^7 \equiv -400 \times -400 \times -20\pmod{71}$2012-09-20
0

Why don't we start with the minimum positive integer that is $>1$ and reach $7^{35}$ as the multiplication by $2$ is much easier.

$2^5=32,2^7=128\equiv -14{\pmod {71}}$

Now $2^8\equiv -28{\pmod {71}},2^{16}\equiv 784\equiv 3,2^{32}\equiv 9$

So, $2^{35}=2^{32}2^3\equiv 9\cdot 8 {\pmod {71}} \equiv 1$

If $m\equiv 2^n{\pmod {71}},$ where $n$ is any positive integer,

$m^{35}=(2^n)^{35}=(2^{35})^n\equiv (1)^n{\pmod {71}}=1$

$\implies (-m)^{35}=m^{35}(-1)^{35}\equiv-1{\pmod {71}}$

$\implies (-m)^5≢1{\pmod {71}}$ and $(-m)^7≢1$

We just need to show that, $(-m)^2 ≢1{\pmod {71}}$

If $n=6,m=64\implies -m=-64\equiv 7{\pmod {71}}$, which is $a$, according to the given problem.

Now $a^2=7^2=49 ≢1{\pmod {71}}$,

so by Lucas test, $71$ is prime.

This method can be employed to any prime of the form $2(2r+1)+1\equiv 3 \pmod 4$

  • 0
    @Arvin, I have also chosen $a=7,$ but the calculation is done with $2$ what is evidently much easier.2012-09-22