2
$\begingroup$

I have the following system of equations: $\alpha f_1(x) = \int_\mathbb{R} g(k) h_1(k) e^{\mathrm{i}kx} dk$ $\beta f_2(x) = \int_\mathbb{R} g(k) h_2(k) e^{\mathrm{i}kx} dk$

with known functions $f_i(x)$ and $h_i(x)$ and unknown $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $g(k)$.
Before outlining my ansatz, here directly the question:

Under which conditions on $f_1(x)$ and $f_2(x)$ can we calculate the ratio $\frac\beta\alpha$ uniquely?

My approach

The first step was to integrate one of the equations, $\alpha \int_\mathbb{R} f_1(x) e^{-\mathrm{i}\lambda x}dx = \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} g(k) h_1(k) e^{\mathrm{i}(k-\lambda)x} dxdk$ resulting in $\alpha F_1(k) = 2\pi g(k) h_1(k)$ because of $\delta\left(k-\lambda\right) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{\mathrm{i}\left(k-\lambda\right)x}dx$

hence $g(k)$ can be seen as calculated. Plugging this into the second equation, one gets

$2\pi\frac\beta\alpha f_2(x) = \int_\mathbb{R} F_1(k) \frac{h_2(k)}{h_1(k)} e^{\mathrm{i}kx} dk\, .$

Now I think the answer to the question relates to a further integration of this equation via some kernel $K(x)$. I would think that this is somehow the dual of the function $f_2(x)$ like in a Hilbert space. But I don't know if this really gives me a well defined unique result, and, how to calculate the dual of $f_2(x)$.

I would be thankful for any hint
Sincerely

Robert

A little excuse
As some might have noticed, I am at the moment occupied with some questions arising in, say, applied functional analysis. As a physicist I am often not very sure about the justification of what I am doing so I hope it is ok to ask these questions here even though the answers might be obvious to most of the people in this community.

  • 0
    @JonasT: Thank you for your thoughts! By the dual I mean it in the sense as in the Dirac notation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra-ket_notation . What you meantion in your second comment is exactly the problem. If $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are just constants (as I might not have pointed out very direct), taking the Fourier transform and dividing, they will be functions... This is one thing I am puzzled with :) Greets2011-01-21

1 Answers 1

1

Fold each integral with $\int_{\mathbb{R}} d x\, e^{-i\lambda x}$, $\begin{eqnarray*} \alpha F_1(k) &=& 2\pi g(k) h_1(k) \\ \beta F_2(k) &=& 2\pi g(k) h_2(k). \end{eqnarray*}$ Therefore, $\alpha h_2(k) F_1(k) = \beta h_1(k) F_2(k),$ or $\alpha \mathcal{F}\{ \eta_2 * f_1\} = \beta \mathcal{F}\{ \eta_1 * f_2\},$ where $*$ is the convolution and $\eta_i = \mathcal{F}^{-1}\{h_i\}$. Thus, if $\eta_2 * f_1 \propto \eta_1 * f_2$ and $\eta_1 * f_2 \ne 0$ the ratio $\beta/\alpha$ can be found uniquely, it is $(\eta_2 * f_1)/(\eta_1 * f_2)$.

As @JonasTeuwen mentioned in the comments, a sufficient condition for this all to work is $f_i$, $h_i$, and $g$ are tempered distributions.

  • 0
    I wanted to know if a certain approach I was using in some paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.4934) was unique :)2012-04-28