1
$\begingroup$

I have a $T\colon\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^2$ linear operator given by $T(x,y) = (2x - y, -8x + 4y)$

How can I tell if the vector $(1, -4)$ is in $R(T)$?

Ok so I set everything into a matrix:

$\left( \begin{matrix} 2 & -1 & 1\\ -8 & 4 & -4\\ \end{matrix}\right) $

I row reduced it and found that it was linearly dependent. So I'm going to assume that that means it's is in R(T).

Edit: I'm not sure if I did that right because it isn't set to 0.

  • 0
    I am adding this comment here (for now) because you deleted the other question. If what you have is a problem taken from a book/assignemnt, it is perfectly fine to *quote it* (say, in a quote box by preceding the first character in the paragraph with `> `, and then write down your own comments and describe your doubts. If you are confused about what a problem is asking you to do, then that's the way to go. But your recently deleted question was an absolute mess: it started halfway through, and you never even said what "the problem" you were trying to solve *was*.2011-04-26

3 Answers 3

3

Preface added given the confusion exhibited by the OP in the comments.

We are trying to figure out whether or not there exist real numbers $x$ and $y$ such that $T(x,y) = (1,-4).$ (That's what it means for $(1,-4)$ to be in $R(T)$; it is in the range if there do exist such $x$ and $y$; it is not in the range if no such $x$ and $y$ exist). This is the same as asking whether or not there exist real numbers $x$ and $y$ such that $(2x - y , -8x + 4y) = (1,-4),$ which is the same as trying to solve the system of linear equations $\begin{array}{rcccl} 2x & - & y & = & 1\\ -8x & + & 4y & = & -4. \end{array}$

That is: the linear transformation can be represented by the $2\times 2$ matrix $\left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & -1\\ -8 & 4 \end{array}\right),$ in the sense that $T(x,y) = (a,b)$ if and only if $\left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & -1\\ -8&4\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x\\y\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}a\\b\end{array}\right).$

So, $(1,-4)$ is in the range of $T$ if and only if there exists $x$ and $y$ such that $\left(\begin{array}{rr} 2 & -1\\ -8 & 4\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x\\y\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{r}1\\-4\end{array}\right),$ which as you write is equivalent to solving the system with augmented matrix $\left(\begin{array}{rr|r} 2 & -1 & 1\\ -8 & 4 & -4 \end{array}\right).$ You will not be able to solve this by "inverting the matrix", because the matrix that corresponds to the linear transformation is not invertible. But you should be able to use Gauss-Jordan elimination (row reduction) to figure out whether or not this system has a solution.

Why are we trying to solve the system? Because finding a solution $(x,y)$ to this system is equivalent to finding a vector $(x,y)$ such that $T(x,y)=(1,-4)$. Any solution gives such a vector. And such a vector is a "witness" to the fact that $(1,-4)$ is in $R(T)$ (because $R(T)$ is the collection of all elements $(a,b)$ of $\mathbb{R}^2$ for which there exist a vector $(x,y)$ such that $T(x,y)=(a,b)$).

So: if the system has a solution, then $(1,-4)$ is in the range and the solution of the system is a witness to the fact that it is in the range. If you plug any solution to the system into $T$, you should get $(1,-4)$.

If the system is inconsistent, then that means there are no solutions, so $(1,-4)$ is not in the range.

Added. So you figured out by row reduction that the system is equivalent to the system with augmented matrix $\left(\begin{array}{cr|c} 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right).$ This is the matrix of a system of linear equations; you should be able to find the solutions to this system. Find a solution to this system: that means finding a specific value of $x$ and a specific value of $y$ that is a solution to this (and therefore to the original) system of linear equations. Those specific values of $x$ and $y$ that solve this system, which also solve the original system, should (if you've done everything right), when plugged into $T$, give you $(1,-4)$ as the output. And that will prove explicitly that $(1,-4)$ lies in $R(T)$.

  • 0
    @Cascadia: Let's pretend that you are *not* taking Linear Algebra. Note that the second equation is obtained by multiplying every term in the first equation by $-4$. So the second equation gives no further information, imposes no further constraints. If you find a solution of the first equation, it will *automatically* be a solution of the second. Now look at the first equation, and (for example) set $x=0$. Then $y=-1$. So $(0,-1)$ works. Recall that it is automatically a solution of the second equation, but if you are worried, check by plugging in.2011-04-21
1

Check whether there is a solution to the system of $2$ equations $2x-y=1$, $-8x+4y=-4$.

In response to a comment, there are many ways to try to solve a system of equations. In this case one can easily spot a solution. You may also have learned about row reduction, though that is serious overkill here.

0

Notice that this is equivalent to asking if the vector $<1,-4>$ is in the span of the columns of $T$.

If row reduce this system to the reduced row echelon form of the augmented matrix, you will get all zeros in the last row, so the system is consistent.

Because there are no pivots in the last row you then conclude that there are an infinite number of solutions (as any numbers $x$ and $y$ multiplied by zero will result in zero).

Also if you notice the second equation is really the first equation multiplied by -4 so really it is just the same linear equation.

Ben

  • 0
    David: I was thinking of the comment in your answer saying that a column of all zeros then the system is inconsistent. You may have been referring to the particular conditions of this matrix, tho, and not making a general statement about matrix systems. If this last is so, or you meant something else, please ignore, and sorry.2011-04-21