1
$\begingroup$

Abstract definition of a cone: locus of points of line segments join a single point $v$, called vertex with set of coplanar points called base.

Height of cone is distance from vertex to plane.

If I take strange set of co-planer point such as complicated design for example, as base then volume of the set join with some vertex is still given : $\tfrac13$ (base)(height).

How can I prove this in calculus?

I have tried a few it is too late to wake my sister, thank you.

4 Answers 4

2

Deno te $A$ the base area and $H$ the height of the cone. now we establish the coordinate system by setting the origin as the vertex of the cone, and the X-axis the line starting from the origin and pependicular to the base, i.e., the X-axis is along the direction of the height. Then take variable x as the distance from any point on X-axis on the interval [0,H]. Denote $A_t$ the area of the transverse section which is defined as the intersection of the plane $x=t$ and the cone. Then the volume of the cone shall be $ V = \int_0^H A_t dt$ Note that we have $ \frac{A_t}{A} = \frac{t^2}{H^2} $ Thus we have $A_t = \frac{A}{H^2} t^2$. Combining these two formula together we get $ V = \frac{A}{H^2} \int_0^H t^2 dt = \frac{1}{3} AH. $

  • 0
    @Amy Pry: If two plane figures $A$ and $B$ are *similar*, and $A$ is obtained from $B$ by multiplying all (linear) dimensions of $B$ by the scaling factor $s$, then the area of $A$ is $s^2$ times the area of $B$. (In your situation, any slice parallel to the base is the base scaled by $t/h$, where $h$ is the height of the cone and $t$ is the perpendicular distance of the slice from the apex.)2011-05-10
1

You can assume the cone to be constructed of disks of infinitesimal thickness stacked one on top of the other, with the largest disk having radius $R$ at height $h=H$ and the smallest having radius $0$ at height $h=0$.

The radius of any disk in between, $r$ can be written as

$r=R\frac{h}{H}$

The volume of a single disk, $dV$ is

$dV=\pi r^2 dh = \pi r^2 \frac{H}{R}dr$

and the volume of the cone is then obtained by integrating (summing) the volume of each of the disks

$V=\int dV=\pi\frac{H}{R}\int_0^R r^2 dr=\frac{1}{3}\pi R^2 H$

  • 0
    Thank you. I have done a lot of examples with the base as different shapes, square, rectangle, circle, etc. What I do not see is how to generalize this since in each A(x) is different.2011-05-10
1

The derivation below is true for any cone (need not be right circular). Let the base area of the cone be $A$ and the height of the cone be $h$. Note that the area at any height $y$ is given by $A(y) = A \times \left( \frac{y}{h} \right)^2$ (Why?). Now the volume of the cone is nothing but $V = \int_0^h A(y) dy \text{ (Why?)}$ $V = \int_0^h A \times \left( \frac{y}{h} \right)^2 dy = \frac1{3} A h$

  • 0
    @Amy: http://en.w$i$kipedia.org/wiki/Polar_coordinate_system#Integral_calculus_.28Area.29 I hope the wiki link helps you to understand computing areas using polar coordinates else feel free to ping back.2011-05-10
1

$ V = \int_{V}{\rm d}V = \int_{V}{\nabla\cdot\vec{r} \over 3}\,{\rm d}V = {1 \over 3}\int_{S}\vec{r}\cdot{\rm d}\vec{S}\,\qquad\mbox{( according Gauss )} $

Whith the cone vertex as the origin, $\vec{r}\cdot{\rm d}\vec{S} \not= 0$ in the base. Then, we get

$ V = {1 \over 3}\int_{\mbox{base}}h\left\vert{\rm d}\vec{S}\right\vert = {1 \over 3}hA $