6
$\begingroup$

Consider the following exercise:

Of the following, which is the best approximation of $\sqrt{1.5}(266)^{1.5}$?

A 1,000 B 2,700 C 3,200 D 4,100 E 5,300

The direct idea is using the "differential approximation": f(x)\approx f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)

where $f(x)=\sqrt{x}266^x$ and $x_0=1$, $x=1.5$.

Finally, one may have to approximate $\log 266$. So here are my questions:

  • How to approximate $\log 266$?

  • Is there any other methods to answer this question?

  • 1
    Good answers have been given below. I want to add that you should only use the differential approximation, when the variable changes by a small amount. The catch is that what "small" means depends on the function. The standard result is that $f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(c)(x-x_0)$ for some $c$ between $x$ and $x_0$. The question then is: how much can $f'(c)$ change within this interval? Here you see that $D(266^x)$ alone changes by a factor of 16 within this range. That speaks volumes *against* using this approach. Work out several examples to get a feeling of when it is ok to do this, and when not to!2011-06-11

3 Answers 3

14

I would use $\sqrt{1.5}\cdot 266^{1.5}=\sqrt{1.5}\cdot\sqrt{266}\cdot 266=\sqrt{399}\cdot 266\approx\sqrt{400}\cdot 266=20\cdot 266 = 5320$.

You could make this more accurate using the differential approximation of $f(x)=266\sqrt{x}$ at $x_0=400$: $f(399)\approx 5320+266\cdot\frac{1}{2\sqrt{400}}\cdot(-1)=5320-6.65 = 5313.35.$

  • 2
    However, even with a more accurate version of $\log(266)$, the differential approximation indicated in the question comes out closest to A. It could be expected that the first order approximation would be bad that far away from $x_0=1$, because the second derivative of $\sqrt{x}266^x$ is large in the relevant interval.2011-06-04
8

$\sqrt{1.5}(266)^{1.5}>\sqrt{1.44}(256)^{1.5}=1.2\cdot256\cdot16=1.2\cdot4096=4920-4.8\;.$

Since this is closer to E than to D, the answer must be E.

1

assuming that log is a log in base e, then $log_e 266 = {{log_{10} 266} \over {log_{10} e}}$. Now, approximating $log_{10}$ is easy, just count the number of digits in 266 and subtract 1, so $log_{10} 266 = log (2.66 \cdot 10^2) \approx 2$. Now, you have to know that $log_{10} e = 0.43429448190325176 \approx 0.5$. So ${{log_{10} 266} \over {log_{10} e}} \approx {2 \over 0.5} \approx 4$.

If you want a more rigorous approximation, then we start with the same argument $log_e 266 = {log_{10} 266 \over log_{10} e}$; then let $x = log_{10} 266$ therefore $2 < x < 3$; so since $y = log_{10} e$ is between $0.4 < y < 0.5$, therefore since $log(266) = x/y$ then ${2 \over 0.5} < log_e(266) < {3 \over 0.4}$.

  • 0
    @Jonas: ah right, thanks; I noticed the error yesterday but gets distracted by something else and forgot to fix it.2011-06-05