0
$\begingroup$

Given two sets of points $\pmb{R_U}$, $\pmb{R_S}$ and a time interval $[a,b]$. Let $\pmb{R_U}(t)$, $\pmb{R_S}(t)$ denote the two sets of points occupied by $\pmb{R_U}$ and $\pmb{R_S}$, respectively, at some time $t \in [a,b]$. Then, $\pmb{R_U}$ overlaps $\pmb{R_S}$ in $[a,b]$ if and only if there exists a common point that lies within both $\pmb{R_U}(t)$ and $\pmb{R_S}(t)$ at a certain time $t \in [a,b]$, such that

$\displaystyle \bigcup_{t \in [a,b]} ( \pmb{R_U}(t) \cap \pmb{R_S}(t) ) \neq \emptyset \Leftrightarrow \exists(\vec{p},t) (\vec{p} \in \pmb{R_U}(t) \wedge \vec{p} \in \pmb{R_S}(t), t \in [a,b]).$


How do you prove the above theorem?

Thanks

  • 0
    @Willie: I wasn't even sure what the question was at the time of reading... (the blame lies in immense lack of sleep).2011-08-17

1 Answers 1

0

So, after some careful deciphering of the question, it seems that in fact $R_U$ and $R_S$ are functions defined on $[a,b]$ and such that for every $t$ in $[a,b]$, $R_U(t)$ and $R_S(t)$ are sets.

The LHS of the equivalence you try to prove is equivalent to: $\exists t\,(t\in[a,b]\land R_U(t)\cap R_S(t)\ne\varnothing)$.

The assertion $R_U(t)\cap R_S(t)\ne\varnothing$ is equivalent to: $\exists p\,(p\in R_U(t)\land p\in R_S(t))$.

Now, for any propositions $P$ and $Q$, the assertion: $\exists t\,(P(t)\land(\exists p\,Q(p,t))$ is equivalent to: $\exists (t,p)\,(P(t)\land Q(p,t))$.

Using $t\in[a,b]$ as $P(t)$ and $p\in R_U(t)\land p\in R_S(t)$ as $Q(p,t)$, one gets that the LHS is equivalent to the RHS, qed.

  • 0
    Thank you very much for your answer. Could you please help me with the following problem too? http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/58049/approximation-for-space-time-intersection-of-two-point-sets2011-08-17