I am trying to understand the basic result in this paper:
http://www.aimath.org/news/partition/folsom-kent-ono.pdf
My problem is with the example at the end of page 2. I understand it's supposed to be a particular instance of theorem 1.1 with $l=13, b_1=1,b_2=3,m=1$, but I can't see how they pass from $p(\frac{l^{b_2}n+1}{24})$ (which might be a fraction for all I know, since it seems like it's equal to $\frac{13^3n+1}{24}$) to $p(13^3n+1007)$.
Where did the 1007 come from? Where did the division by 24 disappear?