It is well known that characteristic subgroups of a group $G$ are normal. Is the converse true?
Normal subgroups vs characteristic subgroups
4 Answers
The converse is wrong. Two counterexamples :
1) Let $G$ be the finite group of quaternions (of order $8$). Each subgroup of $G$ of index $2$ is normal but not characteristic.
2) Let $G$ be a vector space. Since $G$ is commutative, each of his subspaces are normal subgroups, but any non-trivial one is clearly not characteristic.
I think the simplest example is the Klein four-group, which you can think of as a direct sum of two cyclic groups of order two, say $A\oplus B$. Because it is abelian, all of its subgroups are normal. However, there is an automorphism which interchanges the two direct summands $A$ and $B$, which shows that $A$ (and $B$) are normal, but not characteristic. (In fact, the other non-trivial proper subgroup, generated by the product of the generators of $A$ and $B$ also works.)
No. Wiki gives $S_3 \times C_2$ ($C_2$ being the cycling group of order 2) as an example--the center isn't a characteristic subgroup.
-
6The centre of any group is characteristic! The first factor $S_3$ in the direct product is normal but not characteristic. – 2011-08-17
On V Consider the map e>e, a>b,b>a, c>c Is an automorphism and sends the normal subgroup {e, a} to {e, b}.