2
$\begingroup$

How does one notationally describe the set which is the union of uncountably many other sets. For instance, for each x such that a < x < b, where a and b are real numbers, if there is assigned a set $N_x$, how does one describe the union of all $N_x$ for all real x, a < x < b?

  • 1
    I would write it as $\cup_{x\in(a,b)}N_x$ or as \cup_{a. Or in `displaystyle': $\displaystyle{\cup_{x\in(a,b)}N_x}$.2011-11-15

4 Answers 4

10

Any of the following is just fine:

$\bigcup_{x\in(a,b)}N_x = \bigcup_{a

In general, if you have sets $S_\alpha$ indexed by elements of some set $A$, you can write $\bigcup_{\alpha\in A}S_\alpha = \bigcup\{S_\alpha:\alpha\in A\}.$

If you have an unindexed collection $\mathscr{S}$ of sets, you can either write simply $\bigcup\mathscr{S}$ or use the sets themselves as indices: $\bigcup_{S\in\mathscr{S}}S = \bigcup\{S:S\in\mathscr{S}\}.$

4

If $I$ is any index set, and $N_i$ is a set for $i\in I$ we write: $\bigcup_{i\in I} N_i$

Sometimes we write instead: $\bigcup\{N_i\mid i\in I\}$

3

Usually something like this:

$\bigcup_{a

In general, given any set $\Lambda$ (called "index set" in such a context) along with a collection of sets $A_x$ such that there is $A_x$ for every $x\in\Lambda$, one simply writes

$\bigcup_{x\in\Lambda} A_x$

To denote the union. So yo can also use

$\bigcup_{x\in (a,b)}N_x$

2

I would write it as $\bigcup_{a