I don’t know of a nice intuitive argument; the usual proof is by generating functions. The generating function for the number of partitions with no part divisible by $d$ is $g(x)=\prod_{k\ge 1,\,d\nmid k}\frac1{1-x^k}\;,\tag{1}$ and the generating function for the number of partitions with no part repeated $d$ or more times is $h(x)=\prod_{k\ge 1}(1+x^k+x^{2k}+\cdots+x^{(d-1)k})=\prod_{k\ge 1}\frac{1-x^{dk}}{1-x^k}\;.\tag{2}$
Then $g(x)\prod_{k\ge 1}(1-x^k)=\prod_{k\ge 1,\,d\mid k}(1-x^k)=\prod_{k\ge 1}(1-x^{dk})=h(x)\prod_{k\ge 1}(1-x^k)\;,$ so $h(x)=g(x)$.
To see why $(1)$ and $(2)$ are the desired generating functions, note that $\frac1{1-x^k}=1+x^k+x^{2k}+x^{3k}+\cdots\;.$ Thus, in the product in $(1)$ there is one $x^n$ term for every way of writing $n$ as a sum of numbers not divisible by $d$, and the coefficient of $x^n$ must therefore be the number of ways of writing $n$ as a sum of numbers not divisible by $d$. In the product in $(2)$ there is one $x^n$ term for every way of writing $n$ as a sum $n_1k_1+n_2k_2+\cdots+n_mk_m$ in which the $k_i$ are distinct and the coefficients $n_i$ are all less than $d$. Such a decomposition of $n$ corresponds to a partition with $n_i$ parts of size $k_i$ for $i=1,\dots,m$, so the coefficient of $x^n$ in $h(x)$ must be the number of partitions of $n$ in which every part appears at most $d-1$ times.