This is a question about the proof of Proposition 1.4 in Farb and Margalit's "Primer on Mapping Class Groups" (in v. 5.0, it is on page 37 in the PDF, which you can download here). The proposition states
Let $\alpha$ be a non-nullhomotopic simple closed curve on the (hyperbolic) surface $S$; then $[\alpha]\in\pi_1(S)$ is primitive.
Most of the proof I'm OK with, except right in the beginning, when they write
...let $\phi\in\text{Isom}^+(\mathbb{H}^2)$ be the hyperbolic isometry corresponding to some element of the conjugacy class of $\alpha$.
Two questions:
1) What do they mean by the hyperbolic isometry $\phi$? Don't different elements of $\pi_1(S)$ correspond to different elements of $\text{Isom}^+(\mathbb{H}^2)$? (Here $\pi_1(S)$ is acting as deck transformations on $\mathbb{H}^2$.)
2) Why is there a hyperbolic isometry corresponding to $\alpha$? For example, if $\alpha$ is a simple loop around a puncture point, then shouldn't any such $\phi$ be parabolic?