7
$\begingroup$

Given the events $A, B$ the conditional probability of $A$ supposing that $B$ happened is:

$P(A | B)=\frac{P(A\cap B )}{P(B)}$

Can we write that for the Events $A,B,C$, the following is true?

$P(A | B\cap C)=\frac{P(A\cap B\cap C )}{P(B\cap C)}$

I have couple of problems with the equation above; it doesn't always fit my logical solutions.

If it's not true, I'll be happy to hear why.

Thank you.

  • 2
    The formula for conditional probability is correct only when $P(B)\neq 0$, not when $B$ can occur. There are plenty of events that can occur that have zero probability. Like picking $1/2$ out of a uniform distribution on $[0,1]$ or flipping a coin and having every even flip come up heads.2011-05-24

4 Answers 4

7

Yes you can. I see no fault. Because if you put $K = B \cap C$ you obtain the original result

7

Yes and this is also known as multiple conditioning. In general, $P(A_1 \cap \cdots \cap A_n) = P(A_1) \prod_{i=2}^{n} P(A_{i}|A_{1} \cap \cdots \cap A_{i-1})$

  • 3
    The way you've written that is (very) prone to misinterpretation.2011-05-24
4

Yes, $ P(A|B \cap C) = \frac{{P(A \cap (B \cap C))}}{{P(B \cap C)}} = \frac{{P(A \cap B \cap C)}}{{P(B \cap C)}}. $

  • 1
    In addition, see Section 1.5 in http://www.math.nyu.edu/faculty/goodman/teaching/StochCalc/notes/l1.pdf2011-05-24
3

Yes, your conclusion is correct. Note that the way you have defined conditional probability, you must insist that the denominator be non-zero.