4
$\begingroup$

Suppose $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is Borel measurable. I want to show that $\displaystyle \int_a^b f(x)\mathrm dx=0$ for all $-\infty with $a$ and $b$ rational implies that $f=0$ a.e. I'm really not sure how to approach this problem; any help would be welcome.

  • 0
    Perhaps the Lebesgue Density Theorem?2011-08-24

1 Answers 1

5

If it's true of all rational $a, then it's true of all real $a. Pick rational $a_n\uparrow a$ and rational $b_n\downarrow b$ and look at $f\cdot 1_{(a_n,b_n)}$, where $1_S$ is the indicator function of the set $S$. This converges pointwise to $f\cdot1_{(a,b)}$, and dominated convergence can be used, where the dominating function is $|f\cdot 1_{(a_1,b_1)}|$.

Later edit: Following a suggestion in the comments, I am adding this appendix to my answer. "Recall" (?) that:

The Lebesgue integral $\int f$ of any non-negative measurable function exists and is either $\infty$ or a finite number.

Any measurable function $f$ can be written as a sum $f^+ - f^-$ of positive and negative parts $f^+$ and $f^-$, where $f^+(x) = f(x)$ if $f(x) \ge 0$ and $f^+(x) = 0$ if $f(x) < 0$, and likewise $f^-(x)= -f(x) > 0$ if $f(x) < 0$ and $f^-(x) = 0$ if $f(x)>0$. The Lebesgue integral $\int f$ is then defined as $\int f^+ - \int f^-$ provided these are not both infinite. $f$ is said to be integrable precisely if both of these integrals are finite. That is the same as saying $\int|f| < \infty$.

  • 0
    And if it's true for reals $a\lt b$ the result can be derived like [this](http://math.stackexchange.com/a/158326/8271).2012-08-07