-1
$\begingroup$

The problem is to convert this integral from $dxdy$ form into $rdrd\theta$ form , please upload the graph also. I have the problem especially on the domain of the $\theta$ when convert from Cartesian coordinate into polar coordinate, thanks in advance for your help. $\int ^2 _{-2} \int ^3 _{-3} (x^2+y^2)\,dx\,dy$

I just want to learn how to convert this into polar coordinate and learn how to compute this in polar coordinate as a example

The answer is $\int_{-\arctan \frac{3}{2}}^{\arctan \frac{3}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{2}{\cos \theta}} r^2 r\,dr\,d\theta,$ please explain

  • 0
    @ Victor: I don't and did not claim I do.2011-12-11

2 Answers 2

3

The reason people are suggesting not doing this in polar coordinates is that although the integrand is nice in those coordinates, the region of integration is not. Converting the integral $\int ^2 _{-2} \int ^3 _{-3} (x^2+y^2)dxdy=\int \int r^2 r\;dr\;d\theta$ gives you something easy, but expressing the region of integration is tougher. I would break it into four pieces, with one being $\int_{-\arctan \frac{3}{2}}^{\arctan \frac{3}{2}} \int_0^{\frac{2}{\cos \theta}} r^2 r\;dr\;d\theta$. This represents the triangle $(0,0), (2,-3), (2,3)$

  • 0
    @Victor: I don't understand what needs expressing in polar coordinates. The triangle is represented by its sides: the two rays at angles $\pm \arctan \frac{3}{2}$ and the line $r \cos \theta=2$, which is $x=2$. The $r$ integral is easy. I didn't try the $\theta$ one.2011-12-11
0

Check Wikipedia for the inverse transformation of polar coordinates. Note, that $x^2+y^2=r^2$, and that $rdrd\theta = dxdy$. By using the inverse transformation, you can easily find the upper and lower bound for the integral for both $r,\theta$. I would like to refer you to Wikipedia for that as it is rewarding to carry this calculation out on one's own.

The inverse transformations are given by:

$r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}, \theta = \arctan\left(y/x\right)$ (Watch the signs!!!).

Now simply find the maximal and minimal values of both$r,\theta$. However, I'd advise you not to use polar coordinates. The region is well-adapted, actually, it is a square. But since you want to perform this tedious calculation...

Try to make use of the inverse transformation (Frankly, I don't know the result in polar coordinates) and try to calculate this integral in polar coordinates. Then however, calculate it in Cartesian coordinates. If you reach the same result you're done.

  • 0
    As I said before, check Wikipedia for the inverse transformation. If you learn it for your own interest, then you should have a high level of frustration tolerance. OK, I'll edit my answer.2011-12-11