531/735 Programming Assignment 4 Grade Sheet

Name: _________________________________________________

• Electronic Submittal (- points only)
  • Was it done properly?
  • On Time?

• Hardcopy
  • (5 points) Was the listing included?
    (10 points) Was the listing readable?
    

  • (50 points) Did the program execute properly?
    Did the program provide a list of sorted numbers as output as specified?
    Were command line arguments handled properly?
    Did it handle a bad number of numbers?
    Did it handle N < P?
    Did it handle N = P?
    Did it handle N >> P?
    Did it execute on
    1 Processor?
    2 Processors?
    3 Processors?
    4 Processors?
    

  • (5 points) Was a discussion of the algorithm included?
    Including the problems solved?
    Comments:

     

     

  • (10 points) Was a timing studies done?
    Were the times plotted versus the number of processors on the x-axis?
    Was a separate plot of speedup plotted versus the number of processors on the x-axis included?
    Was a separate plot of efficiency plotted versus the number of processors on the x-axis included?
    Was a discussion timing studies included?
    Was a discussion comparing this timing study with the timing study for the mpi implementation included?
    Comments:

     

     

  • (5 points) Was a comparison of programming using the data parallel model versus parallaxis, C-linda and mpi included. SIMD/MIMD?
    shared or distributed memory model?
    topology?
    ease of programming?
    flexibility of model?
    need to handle deadlock, synchronizaton or termination?
    Comments:

     

     

  • (5 points) Was a comparison of your experience in executing openMP programs on a parallel machine with your experiences with C-linda and MPI included?
    Comments:

     

     

• Bonus Points
  • (5 points) Best speed up in combination with the fastest time
  • (5 points) Largest number of numbers sorted in combination with the fastest time

• Grade _________